Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nokia 4A0-205 Exam - Topic 1 Question 7 Discussion

By using the EPT run design command, are the previously designed elements removed?
B) It depends, the user is prompted to choose whether to delete or leave the previously designed elements.
A) Yes, they are but only the first time the command is launched as - for future design phases - the existing packs need to keep the same slotting.
C) Not the design is always progressive, on top of the previous design.
D) Yes, although this is not happening in case of GMPLS-enabled nodes because existing slots cannot change as they are controlled by another manager (GMRE).

Nokia 4A0-205 Exam - Topic 1 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-205 exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 1
[All 4A0-205 Questions]

By using the EPT run design command, are the previously designed elements removed?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The EPT run design command can remove previously designed elements, but the user is prompted to choose whether to delete them or leave them intact. This allows the user to progress their design while still keeping the existing elements in place. If the user selects to leave the existing elements, then they will remain in the same slots. If GMPLS nodes are used, the existing slots cannot change as they are controlled by another manager (GMRE).


by Gladys at Mar 22, 2023, 09:52 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-205 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Rosamond
8 months ago
Not sure about option C, seems like it should overwrite sometimes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
9 months ago
I agree with Ettie, choice is key here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
9 months ago
Wait, are you saying it only deletes the first time? That sounds weird.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
9 months ago
Definitely option D, GMPLS nodes have their own rules!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
9 months ago
I think it's option B, you get to choose what to do.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thea
9 months ago
Option D seems specific about GMPLS nodes, but I can't recall if that affects the overall design command.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
9 months ago
I feel like the design is always progressive, which makes me lean towards option C, but I could be wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnda
9 months ago
I remember something about being prompted in a similar question, so maybe option B is correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
10 months ago
I think option A sounds familiar, but I'm not entirely sure if it applies to all design phases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabra
10 months ago
Okay, I've got this. A service level indicator is a quantitative measure of the level of service, not a subjective assessment. So option D is the best answer here. I feel confident about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
10 months ago
I'm pretty confident that the answer is B - "To permit adaptation as required." The ADM numbering scheme is meant to be a guideline, not a strict rule, so that organizations can adjust it as needed for their specific requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alona
10 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully consider the information provided about the network setup and the failover behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know WS-Addressing has something to do with web services, but I can't recall the exact functionality. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel