Nokia 4A0-116 Exam - Topic 7 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-116 exam

Question #: 28
Topic #: 7

[All 4A0-116 Questions]

Which of the following statements about the operation of seamless-BFD is FALSE?

ASeamless-BFD responses are sent back using the LSP label stack.

BTo be able to respond to seamless-BFD messages, a router must be configured as a reflector.

CA seamless-BFD template needs to be configured on the head-end of the LSP.

DThe routing protocol (OSPF or IS-IS) is used to carry the reflector discriminator information.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Willis at May 07, 2024, 07:59 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-116 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Barbra

5 months ago

Wait, are we sure about B? Reflector config seems off.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sheron

5 months ago

D is definitely true, OSPF carries that info.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yuette

5 months ago

C sounds right, but I’m not sure about the specifics.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jutta

5 months ago

Totally agree, B is misleading.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shannan

6 months ago

A is true, responses use the LSP label stack.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lucy

6 months ago

The part about the routing protocol carrying the reflector discriminator seems off to me; I thought that was handled differently in seamless-BFD.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sage

6 months ago

I feel like the statement about the LSP label stack is true, but I might be mixing it up with other BFD configurations.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shayne

6 months ago

I think I came across a similar question where the reflector's role was emphasized, but I can't recall if it's the only way to respond to seamless-BFD messages.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shenika

6 months ago

I remember studying seamless-BFD, but I'm not entirely sure if the reflector configuration is mandatory for all routers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorothea

6 months ago

I've got a good feeling about this question. The key is to focus on the specific details of how seamless-BFD operates.

upvoted 0 times

...

Charlette

6 months ago

Ah, this is a tricky one. I'll need to review my notes on seamless-BFD to make sure I have the details right before answering.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nicolette

6 months ago

Okay, let me see here. I remember learning about seamless-BFD in class, so I think I can work through this step-by-step.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shad

6 months ago

This question seems pretty straightforward. I think I can eliminate a few of the options pretty quickly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marguerita

7 months ago

Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I'll need to think it through carefully to make sure I understand the concepts behind seamless-BFD.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mammie

7 months ago

I remember learning about this in class, but I'm drawing a blank on the specifics right now. I'll have to review my notes to refresh my memory.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margurite

7 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but analyzing could be a fit too? I remember a practice question that emphasized using data for improvement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yuriko

11 months ago

I'm going with option A. Sending the responses back using the LSP label stack makes sense for seamless-BFD operation.

upvoted 0 times

Olen

10 months ago

I'm not sure about option B, do you think a router must be configured as a reflector to respond to seamless-BFD messages?

upvoted 0 times

...

Jettie

10 months ago

I think option C is also important, configuring a seamless-BFD template on the head-end is crucial.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tijuana

10 months ago

I agree, option A seems like the correct choice for seamless-BFD operation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Augustine

11 months ago

Ha! As if any of us actually know how seamless-BFD works. Let's just guess and hope for the best!

upvoted 0 times

...

Lovetta

12 months ago

Option D is false - the routing protocol is not used to carry the reflector discriminator information. That's handled through other mechanisms.

upvoted 0 times

...

Detra

12 months ago

I'm pretty sure option C is the correct answer. A seamless-BFD template must be configured on the head-end to enable this functionality.

upvoted 0 times

Jeanice

10 months ago

That's correct, without the template on the head-end, seamless-BFD won't work properly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lonna

10 months ago

Yes, a seamless-BFD template does need to be configured on the head-end.

upvoted 0 times

...

Meaghan

11 months ago

I think you are right, option C is the correct answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lettie

1 year ago

I believe the correct answer is A) as well. The seamless-BFD template is configured on the head-end of the LSP, not using the LSP label stack.

upvoted 0 times

...

Enola

1 year ago

I agree with Portia, because seamless-BFD responses are actually sent back using the IP header, not the LSP label stack.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ernie

1 year ago

Option B seems incorrect - a reflector is not required to respond to seamless-BFD messages. The routers can respond without any special configuration.

upvoted 0 times