Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nokia 4A0-116 Exam - Topic 7 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-116 exam
Question #: 28
Topic #: 7
[All 4A0-116 Questions]

Which of the following statements about the operation of seamless-BFD is FALSE?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Barbra
5 months ago
Wait, are we sure about B? Reflector config seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheron
5 months ago
D is definitely true, OSPF carries that info.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
5 months ago
C sounds right, but I’m not sure about the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
5 months ago
Totally agree, B is misleading.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannan
6 months ago
A is true, responses use the LSP label stack.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
6 months ago
The part about the routing protocol carrying the reflector discriminator seems off to me; I thought that was handled differently in seamless-BFD.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
6 months ago
I feel like the statement about the LSP label stack is true, but I might be mixing it up with other BFD configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shayne
6 months ago
I think I came across a similar question where the reflector's role was emphasized, but I can't recall if it's the only way to respond to seamless-BFD messages.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
6 months ago
I remember studying seamless-BFD, but I'm not entirely sure if the reflector configuration is mandatory for all routers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothea
6 months ago
I've got a good feeling about this question. The key is to focus on the specific details of how seamless-BFD operates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlette
6 months ago
Ah, this is a tricky one. I'll need to review my notes on seamless-BFD to make sure I have the details right before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicolette
6 months ago
Okay, let me see here. I remember learning about seamless-BFD in class, so I think I can work through this step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shad
6 months ago
This question seems pretty straightforward. I think I can eliminate a few of the options pretty quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marguerita
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I'll need to think it through carefully to make sure I understand the concepts behind seamless-BFD.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
7 months ago
I remember learning about this in class, but I'm drawing a blank on the specifics right now. I'll have to review my notes to refresh my memory.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
7 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but analyzing could be a fit too? I remember a practice question that emphasized using data for improvement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuriko
11 months ago
I'm going with option A. Sending the responses back using the LSP label stack makes sense for seamless-BFD operation.
upvoted 0 times
Olen
10 months ago
I'm not sure about option B, do you think a router must be configured as a reflector to respond to seamless-BFD messages?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
10 months ago
I think option C is also important, configuring a seamless-BFD template on the head-end is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
10 months ago
I agree, option A seems like the correct choice for seamless-BFD operation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Augustine
11 months ago
Ha! As if any of us actually know how seamless-BFD works. Let's just guess and hope for the best!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lovetta
12 months ago
Option D is false - the routing protocol is not used to carry the reflector discriminator information. That's handled through other mechanisms.
upvoted 0 times
...
Detra
12 months ago
I'm pretty sure option C is the correct answer. A seamless-BFD template must be configured on the head-end to enable this functionality.
upvoted 0 times
Jeanice
10 months ago
That's correct, without the template on the head-end, seamless-BFD won't work properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
10 months ago
Yes, a seamless-BFD template does need to be configured on the head-end.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meaghan
11 months ago
I think you are right, option C is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lettie
1 year ago
I believe the correct answer is A) as well. The seamless-BFD template is configured on the head-end of the LSP, not using the LSP label stack.
upvoted 0 times
...
Enola
1 year ago
I agree with Portia, because seamless-BFD responses are actually sent back using the IP header, not the LSP label stack.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
1 year ago
Option B seems incorrect - a reflector is not required to respond to seamless-BFD messages. The routers can respond without any special configuration.
upvoted 0 times
Mattie
11 months ago
User2: That's right, routers can respond without any special configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julianna
12 months ago
User1: I think option B is incorrect, a reflector is not needed for seamless-BFD messages.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Portia
1 year ago
I think the false statement is A) Seamless-BFD responses are sent back using the LSP label stack.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
1 year ago
Hmm, that makes sense. I'll have to review that part again before the exam.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlette
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) The routing protocol is used to carry the reflector discriminator information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) Seamless-BFD responses are sent back using the LSP label stack.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel