MENU
OSPF is being used for segment routing with traffic-engineering (SR-TE). The traffic-engineering option has been set to "sr-te false". Which of the following statements is TRUE?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium 4A0-116 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
Bandwidth availability can be configured as a link attribute in SR-TE, it is used to control the amount of traffic that can be sent over a particular link.
37 comments · newest first
FR
Francoise
11 months ago
I disagree, B seems more accurate to me.
VE
Venita
11 months ago
Definitely not A, that’s for sure.
FL
Florinda
11 months ago
Wait, so "sr-te false" means no TE info? Sounds odd.
LA
Lawanda
11 months ago
I think option D is the right one.
KA
Kati
12 months ago
OSPF with SR-TE is pretty cool!
LY
Lynsey
12 months ago
I feel like the extended-link opaque LSAs are important here, but I'm not entirely confident if that's the right answer for this scenario.
RA
Raelene
1 year ago
If I recall correctly, the TE information should only be advertised for links with both MPLS and RSVP, but I might be mixing it up with another protocol.
NA
Narcisa
1 year ago
I think I practiced a question similar to this, and I recall that TE info is tied to MPLS, but I can't remember the specifics about the sub-TLVs.
LO
Lorita
1 year ago
I remember something about OSPF and MPLS, but I'm not sure how "sr-te false" affects the TE information.
MA
Marcos
1 year ago
This is a good test of my understanding of OSPF segment routing and traffic engineering. I'll draw out a diagram in my head to visualize the different scenarios and narrow down the right answer.
VE
Verona
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is that with "sr-te false", the TE information will only be advertised using specific mechanisms, not across all MPLS-enabled links. I'll carefully consider each option to determine which one is correct.
DE
Devora
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording here. I'll need to review my notes on OSPF traffic engineering to make sure I understand the different options and how they impact the advertisement of TE information.
JE
Jennie
1 year ago
This question seems a bit tricky, but I think I can work through it. Let me carefully read the options and think about the implications of the "sr-te false" setting.
HA
Harris
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The key is understanding that pro forma statements are forecasts, not actual results. I'll go with option A.
EL
Elfrieda
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. The wording is a bit tricky. I'll need to think it through carefully.
ZA
Zack
1 year ago
I'm a little lost on this one. There are a lot of different procurement documents mentioned, and I'm not totally clear on the differences between them. I'll have to review my notes before making a guess.
MI
Michael
1 year ago
Data augmentation for the minority class? I don't think that's relevant here. This question is specifically about dealing with high magnitude features, not class imbalance. I'm pretty confident data normalization is the correct answer.
BE
Berry
1 year ago
Okay, I think the key here is to identify the demographic characteristics that would be most predictive of Instagram usage. Things like age, interests, and geographic location seem like they'd be crucial. I'll make sure to explain my reasoning well.
MA
Mary
1 year ago
Ah, the age-old OSPF traffic-engineering conundrum. I'm going to have to go with B on this one. Can't go wrong with application-specific sub-TLVs, right?
SH
Shenika
1 year ago
Definitely, B is the right choice for this scenario.
HE
Herman
1 year ago
I agree, application-specific sub-TLVs are the way to go.
VI
Vincent
1 year ago
I think B is the correct option.
NI
Nieves
1 year ago
Haha, I bet the person who wrote this question is a real traffic-engineering aficionado! But I'm going with B, it just makes the most sense to me.
LE
Lelia
1 year ago
Definitely, B seems like the most accurate option here.
ME
Merlyn
1 year ago
Yeah, I agree. It makes sense that the TE information would only be advertised using application-specific sub-TLVs.
BE
Beckie
1 year ago
I think B is correct too, it seems like the most logical choice.
IR
Ira
1 year ago
I'm not so sure about that. I was thinking it might be D, since the TE information would only be advertised using extended-link opaque LSAs.
LI
Lino
1 year ago
D) The TE information will only be advertised using extended-link opaque LSAs.
BR
Brittney
1 year ago
C) The TE information will only be advertised for the OSPF links that have both MPLS and RSVP enabled.
IR
Ira
1 year ago
B) The TE information will only be advertised using application-specific sub-TLVs.
LO
Lonny
1 year ago
A) The TE information will be advertised for all the OSPF links that have MPLS enabled.
BU
Buck
2 years ago
I think the correct answer is B. If the traffic-engineering option is set to 'sr-te false', the TE information will only be advertised using application-specific sub-TLVs.
VI
Viki
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, if 'sr-te false' is set, TE info will only be advertised using application-specific sub-TLVs.
KE
Keshia
1 year ago
User 1: I think the correct answer is B.
NO
Norah
2 years ago
But why do you think that?
ZA
Zack
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D.
NO
Norah
2 years ago
I think the answer is C.