Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nokia 4A0-116 Exam - Topic 3 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-116 exam
Question #: 24
Topic #: 3
[All 4A0-116 Questions]

Which of the following statements about a Segment Routing SID is FALSE?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Herman at Mar 15, 2024, 01:04 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-116 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Tamekia
5 months ago
Prefix-SIDs can be set as labels or indexes, that's interesting!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
5 months ago
Wait, is it true that an Adjacency-SID doesn't have to be configured?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rex
5 months ago
I thought Adjacency-SIDs always needed to be configured?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonja
5 months ago
Totally agree, that's a basic fact!
upvoted 0 times
...
Aretha
6 months ago
A Node-SID is linked to the router's system interface, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruby
6 months ago
I’m not completely sure, but I think Adjacency-SIDs can be optional, which might make D the false statement here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
6 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think Prefix-SIDs can be configured as labels or indices, so C seems correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
6 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about the Adjacency-SID values. I feel like they might come from the SRGB, but I need to double-check that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
6 months ago
I think I remember that a Node-SID is tied to the router's system interface, so maybe option A is true?
upvoted 0 times
...
Margart
6 months ago
I've got a good handle on Segment Routing concepts, so I think I can eliminate the incorrect statement here. I'll carefully read through each option and select the one that doesn't align with my understanding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
6 months ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. A Node-SID is associated with a router's system interface, an Adjacency-SID comes from the SRGB, and a Prefix-SID can be configured directly or indirectly. I just need to identify which of these statements is false.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
6 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward Segment Routing question. I'm feeling confident I can tackle this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jackie
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the differences between Node-SIDs, Adjacency-SIDs, and Prefix-SIDs. I'll need to review my notes carefully to make sure I understand the distinctions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about the prerequisites for the Self-Provisioning feature. I'll need to review my notes carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
7 months ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is A. Moving Average Chart is the best way to look for trends after smoothing the data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
7 months ago
I think Incident Management should definitely come first since it's about addressing the immediate user experience.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
11 months ago
Wait, what? All routers need the same SRGB range? That's like saying all cars need the same engine size. Option C is clearly the correct answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terina
11 months ago
Option D is the false statement. You can't configure a local Node-SID as an index, it has to be an actual label value. Rookie mistake!
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
11 months ago
Option A is true, a local Node-SID can be configured directly as an MPLS label. I'm a little surprised this is even a question, that's like Segment Routing 101.
upvoted 0 times
Laurena
10 months ago
Hershel: Right, it's important to understand the differences between Node-SID and index in Segment Routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wava
11 months ago
User 3: Option D is false, a local Node-SID cannot be configured as an index.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hershel
11 months ago
User 2: I agree, that's a basic concept in Segment Routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenore
11 months ago
User 1: Option A is definitely true, a local Node-SID can be configured directly as an MPLS label.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rebbecca
11 months ago
I'm pretty sure option C is the correct answer. All routers don't need to have the same SRGB range configured. That's one of the key features of Segment Routing.
upvoted 0 times
Alethea
10 months ago
C) All routers do NOT need to have the same SRGB range configured.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
11 months ago
B) A router advertises its local Node-SID as a local SRGB and an index only if it is configured as an index.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaleesa
11 months ago
A) A local Node-SID can be configured directly as an MPLS label.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tamar
11 months ago
Option B is definitely false. The router should advertise its local Node-SID as an SRGB and an index, regardless of how it's configured.
upvoted 0 times
Edda
10 months ago
C) All routers do NOT need to have the same SRGB range configured.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
10 months ago
B) A router advertises its local Node-SID as a local SRGB and an index only if it is configured as an index.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elouise
11 months ago
A) A local Node-SID can be configured directly as an MPLS label.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rodney
1 year ago
Why do you think that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawny
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodney
1 year ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel