New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nokia 4A0-116 Exam - Topic 2 Question 50 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-116 exam
Question #: 50
Topic #: 2
[All 4A0-116 Questions]

Which of the following statements about path definitions is FALSE?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

The data is transparently carried from end to end: This statement is not true, MPLS does not provide data transparency, which means that the data is not carried unmodified from end to end. MPLS uses labels to forward data, so the original IP packets are encapsulated in new MPLS packets, and the original IP headers are not visible at the egress LSR.


by Audra at Mar 19, 2025, 06:15 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-116 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Shawnda
2 months ago
Wait, are we sure about A? Seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
2 months ago
I agree, A is misleading.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
3 months ago
C is correct, both options are valid for defining hops.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
3 months ago
B is true, loose hops are cool like that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandee
3 months ago
A is definitely false, paths can be shared.
upvoted 0 times
...
Suzan
3 months ago
The part about head-end and tail-end routers being added automatically sounds familiar, but I’m not sure if that’s a standard rule or just specific to certain protocols.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malika
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where the path hops were defined by IP addresses, and I think that statement is true, but I’m not 100% confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
4 months ago
I think a loose hop means it doesn’t have to be directly connected, which seems right, but I’m a bit confused about how that interacts with the other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
4 months ago
I remember studying that once a path is associated with an LSP, it can’t be reused, but I’m not entirely sure if that’s always the case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
4 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The head-end and tail-end routers are implicitly added to the path list, so that's the false statement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Javier
4 months ago
The path hops can be defined by either the system or physical interface IP address - that sounds like the correct statement to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on the difference between loose and strict hops. I'll have to review that concept again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larue
5 months ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is A. Once a path is associated with an LSP, it can't be used by other LSPs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marjory
9 months ago
Looks like we need to follow the breadcrumbs to find the right path. Let's hope there's no trail mix involved!
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
9 months ago
This question is a real path-finder, isn't it? I hope I don't get lost on the way to the correct answer!
upvoted 0 times
Viola
8 months ago
D) In addition to the hops defined in the path list, the head-end and tail-end routers are implicitly added.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miss
8 months ago
C) The path hops can be defined by either the system or physical interface IP address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thurman
8 months ago
B) A loose hop is one that does not have to be directly adjacent to the previous hop in the path list
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherill
8 months ago
A) Once a path is associated with an LSP, it cannot be used by other LSPs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Huey
9 months ago
I agree with option D. The head-end and tail-end routers are implicitly added to the path list.
upvoted 0 times
Rebbecca
8 months ago
I agree with you, option D is definitely the false statement. The head-end and tail-end routers are implicitly added to the path list.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaycee
8 months ago
I believe option C is the false statement. The path hops can only be defined by the system IP address, not the physical interface IP address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgiana
8 months ago
I think option A is the false statement. Once a path is associated with an LSP, it cannot be used by other LSPs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jettie
10 months ago
Option C is true. The path hops can be defined by either the system or physical interface IP address.
upvoted 0 times
Serina
9 months ago
C) The path hops can be defined by either the system or physical interface IP address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonard
9 months ago
B) A loose hop is one that does not have to be directly adjacent to the previous hop in the path list
upvoted 0 times
...
Brianne
9 months ago
A) Once a path is associated with an LSP, it cannot be used by other LSPs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gladis
10 months ago
Option B is correct. A loose hop is one that does not have to be directly adjacent to the previous hop in the path list.
upvoted 0 times
Delisa
9 months ago
That's right, a loose hop can be anywhere in the path list.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
9 months ago
I think option B is correct. A loose hop is not directly adjacent to the previous hop.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dahlia
10 months ago
I believe the correct answer is A) as well, because LSPs can indeed share paths.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecily
11 months ago
I agree with Lavonne, because multiple LSPs can share the same path.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rossana
11 months ago
I think option A is incorrect. Once a path is associated with an LSP, it can be used by other LSPs as well.
upvoted 0 times
Nell
9 months ago
D) In addition to the hops defined in the path list, the head-end and tail-end routers are implicitly added.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joesph
9 months ago
C) The path hops can be defined by either the system or physical interface IP address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terry
9 months ago
B) A loose hop is one that does not have to be directly adjacent to the previous hop in the path list
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
9 months ago
A) Once a path is associated with an LSP, it cannot be used by other LSPs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
9 months ago
Head-end and tail-end routers are always implicitly added in the path list.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lazaro
9 months ago
Loose hops don't have to be directly adjacent, that's true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
10 months ago
I agree, paths can be reused by multiple LSPs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
10 months ago
Option A is definitely false. Paths can be shared among LSPs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lavonne
11 months ago
I think the false statement is A) Once a path is associated with an LSP, it cannot be used by other LSPs.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel