Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nokia 4A0-114 Exam - Topic 6 Question 14 Discussion

Posted by Latrice on Apr 23, 2023 at 10:12 PM

Which of the following statements about IPv6 Link-Local addresses is FALSE?

Suggested Answer: D

Get Premium 4A0-114 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
47 comments · newest first
AN
Annice 11 months ago
I thought link-local addresses were just for local comms, so B makes sense.
GO
Golda 12 months ago
Wait, D? That sounds weird, is that really how it works?
LO
Loreen 12 months ago
C seems off, they don’t all share the same prefix.
LA
Lamonica 1 year ago
Totally agree, B is spot on!
RO
Rossana 1 year ago
A is true, every interface gets one.
AY
Ayesha 1 year ago
I’m pretty confident that Link-Local addresses are only for local communication, so option B should be correct.
TO
Tora 1 year ago
I practiced a similar question about Link-Local addresses, and I feel like they do have a common subnet prefix, which makes option C true.
DA
Dallas 1 year ago
I think option D is tricky; I’m not sure if the interface ID is always derived from the IPv4 address.
AL
Alberta 1 year ago
I remember that Link-Local addresses are automatically assigned, so option A seems true.
TR
Tran 1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure what the "correct" answer is here. I'll have to think it through carefully and try to eliminate the options that are clearly required in a surveillance policy.
RO
Rosalyn 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the overtime measure. While it could indicate the team is working hard, it might not be the best indicator of test effectiveness. I'll need to weigh that one carefully.
CA
Cassi 1 year ago
I remember discussing CPFR in class as a way for retailers and suppliers to work together on inventory management and demand forecasting. That seems like the best fit for the scenario described in the question. I'll mark that as my answer.
JO
Johnna 1 year ago
D? More like 'Deez Nuts'! Am I right, folks?
LA
Lanie 1 year ago
This one's tricky, but I think B is the false statement. Link-local addresses aren't just for the same broadcast domain, are they?
SA
Samuel 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lanie
D) They have an interface ID derived by default from the interface's IPv4 address.
DE
Deane 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lanie
C) They all have the same 64-bit subnet prefix.
BE
Benton 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lanie
B) They are only valid for communication within the same broadcast domain.
KI
Kiera 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lanie
A) They are assigned to every physical interface running IPv6.
CO
Cordell 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lanie
C) They all have the same 64-bit subnet prefix.
BR
Brett 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lanie
B) They are only valid for communication within the same broadcast domain.
WI
Willodean 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lanie
A) They are assigned to every physical interface running IPv6.
MA
Marva 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards A. Isn't it true that every IPv6 interface gets a link-local address automatically?
AL
Aliza 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marva
B) They are only valid for communication within the same broadcast domain.
CO
Corinne 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marva
Yes, that's correct. Link-local addresses are automatically assigned to every IPv6 interface.
RO
Rosina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marva
A) They are assigned to every physical interface running IPv6.
SO
Solange 1 year ago
I'm pretty sure C is the correct answer. All link-local addresses have the same 64-bit prefix, right?
TH
Theron 1 year ago
↳ replying to Solange
Whitley: Exactly. It's important to remember the specifics of how link-local addresses are formed.
HU
Hubert 1 year ago
↳ replying to Solange
User 3: That makes sense. Link-local addresses do have the same 64-bit prefix, but the interface ID is derived from the MAC address.
MA
Mariann 1 year ago
↳ replying to Solange
C) They all have the same 64-bit subnet prefix.
WH
Whitley 1 year ago
↳ replying to Solange
User 2: Oh, I see. So C is actually a true statement about IPv6 Link-Local addresses.
KA
Kaitlyn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Solange
User 1: Actually, the correct answer is D. The interface ID for link-local addresses is derived from the interface's MAC address, not IPv4 address.
WH
Whitney 1 year ago
↳ replying to Solange
D) They have an interface ID derived by default from the interface's IPv4 address.
RE
Reuben 1 year ago
↳ replying to Solange
B) They are only valid for communication within the same broadcast domain.
ST
Stefania 1 year ago
↳ replying to Solange
A) They are assigned to every physical interface running IPv6.
MA
Martha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Solange
C) They all have the same 64-bit subnet prefix.
AL
Aliza 1 year ago
↳ replying to Solange
B) They are only valid for communication within the same broadcast domain.
DO
Doretha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Solange
A) They are assigned to every physical interface running IPv6.
HI
Hillary 2 years ago
Option D seems a bit off. I thought IPv6 link-local addresses used the MAC address, not the IPv4 address.
RI
Ria 1 year ago
↳ replying to Hillary
That's interesting, I didn't know that. Thanks for sharing!
KA
Kayleigh 1 year ago
↳ replying to Hillary
Yeah, you're right. IPv6 link-local addresses actually use the MAC address for the interface ID.
CA
Carry 1 year ago
↳ replying to Hillary
D) They have an interface ID derived by default from the interface's IPv4 address.
MA
Maryln 1 year ago
↳ replying to Hillary
C) They all have the same 64-bit subnet prefix.
AL
Alecia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Hillary
B) They are only valid for communication within the same broadcast domain.
WA
Wade 1 year ago
↳ replying to Hillary
A) They are assigned to every physical interface running IPv6.
SH
Shelton 2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think B is false because Link-Local addresses can be used for communication within the same subnet, not just broadcast domain.
KY
Kyoko 2 years ago
I agree with Cristen, D is false because interface ID is not derived from IPv4 address.
CR
Cristen 2 years ago
I think the false statement is D.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel