Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nokia 4A0-114 Exam - Topic 4 Question 33 Discussion

Posted by Valentine on May 17, 2024 at 09:33 PM

Routers PE1 and PE2 in the diagram exchange MP-BGP route updates that carry the route-target value associated with the EVPN service VPLS 300. What type of addressing information is included in those route updates?

Suggested Answer: B

Get Premium 4A0-114 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
33 comments · newest first
LU
Luann 11 months ago
Pretty sure it's VPN-IPv4, but could be wrong.
MA
Marcos 11 months ago
Wait, EVPN IP-Prefix? I didn't see that coming!
TH
Theodora 11 months ago
No way, it's Label-IPv4!
TA
Tasia 11 months ago
I think it's EVPN MAC, right?
SH
Sheridan 12 months ago
Definitely VPN-IPv4 for those updates.
DE
Delmy 12 months ago
I’m leaning towards EVPN IP-Prefix since it seems to fit the context of VPLS, but I need to double-check my notes.
MA
Malcolm 1 year ago
I feel like it could be Label-IPv4, but I can't recall if that's specifically used for EVPN services.
EA
Earleen 1 year ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we discussed EVPN MAC addresses, so that could be relevant here too.
IN
In 1 year ago
I think the route updates might include VPN-IPv4 addressing, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the right choice for EVPN.
FR
Francesco 1 year ago
I think the answer is EVPN IP-Prefix. The route updates are for an EVPN service, and IP-Prefix is one of the common EVPN address types.
AN
Anika 1 year ago
Okay, the key here is that the route updates are carrying the route-target value associated with the VPLS 300 service. That suggests the addressing information is likely EVPN-related.
VE
Velda 1 year ago
This looks like a straightforward EVPN question. I'll focus on understanding the addressing information carried in the MP-BGP route updates.
AV
Avery 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the different EVPN address types. I'll need to review my notes on EVPN to determine which one is included in the route updates.
LI
Linsey 1 year ago
This is a tricky one, but I'm pretty confident the answer is B. The Customer for Life plan appears to violate the GDPR's requirement in Article 7 that consent must be as easy to withdraw as it is to give. The plan's suggestion of working around withdrawal of consent is a red flag.
JO
Jovita 1 year ago
This looks like a question about customer expectations and satisfaction. I think the key is to understand the difference between what the customer really wants and what they're willing to accept. I'll need to carefully consider each option to determine which one best represents that concept.
MI
Mitsue 1 year ago
Focus groups feel a bit too public for this situation, right? I thought we were looking for something more private.
SH
Shawnta 1 year ago
I practiced a similar question last week, and I believe "structure based" is definitely one of the techniques mentioned in the syllabus.
AR
Arthur 1 year ago
A, VPN-IPv4 all the way! I mean, who doesn't love a good old-fashioned VPN these days? Gotta keep those routes nice and virtual, you know?
TR
Trina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Arthur
B) Label-IPv4
LA
Lacresha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Arthur
Hmm, interesting choice. But I still prefer VPN-IPv4 for that addressing information.
SA
Samira 1 year ago
↳ replying to Arthur
Definitely! VPN-IPv4 is essential for secure routing.
BE
Bernardine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Arthur
B) Label-IPv4
BA
Barrett 1 year ago
↳ replying to Arthur
A) VPN-IPv4
GW
Gwenn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Arthur
Definitely! VPN-IPv4 is the way to go for those route updates.
MA
Mammie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Arthur
A) VPN-IPv4
RO
Rosann 2 years ago
I'm torn between B and C. Label-IPv4 or EVPN MAC? What do you think, the router's going to start juggling IPv4 addresses or just tossing MAC addresses around like confetti?
BE
Beatriz 2 years ago
Hmm, I'm going with D. EVPN IP-Prefix. Isn't that what we use for the next-generation VPN services? Seems like the obvious choice here.
BR
Brent 2 years ago
EVPN MAC, of course! That's the whole point of EVPN, right? Gotta keep those MAC addresses flowing between those PEs.
ME
Merilyn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Brent
That's right! It's essential for maintaining connectivity in the EVPN service.
CL
Claribel 1 year ago
↳ replying to Brent
Yes, EVPN MAC is used to exchange MAC addresses between PEs for VPLS 300.
MI
Mirta 2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be EVPN IP-Prefix. It depends on the specific configuration.
NU
Nu 2 years ago
I agree with Tamekia, VPN-IPv4 makes sense for EVPN service VPLS 300.
TA
Tamekia 2 years ago
I think the addressing information included in those route updates is VPN-IPv4.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel