Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nokia 4A0-113 Exam - Topic 9 Question 81 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-113 exam
Question #: 81
Topic #: 9
[All 4A0-113 Questions]

Click the exhibit button.

Router R2 advertises the network 192.168.3.0/24 to router R1 via OSPF. A route policy has been constructed to discard the route on router R1; however, it is not working. What is the problem?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Lucina at Aug 22, 2024, 03:33 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-113 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Vivan
5 months ago
The reject should be set for import, not export.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lelia
5 months ago
Wait, OSPF can't use import policies? That's surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Golda
5 months ago
I disagree, OSPF can use import policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casandra
5 months ago
Definitely, it has to be committed!
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleni
6 months ago
I think the policy wasn't committed after creation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
6 months ago
I recall that sometimes policies just need to be committed after creation, but I can't remember if that's the case here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyndia
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused about whether OSPF can even use import policies. I feel like I read something about that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariann
6 months ago
I think I practiced a question similar to this where the policy needed to be set for import instead of export.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
6 months ago
I remember something about prefix lists, but I'm not sure if it should be exact or if a broader range would work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reyes
6 months ago
I've got a good feeling about this one. The key is understanding how OSPF route advertisements work and where the policy should be applied. I'm leaning towards option D - the policy was likely not committed after creation, which would explain why it's not working as expected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luz
6 months ago
Okay, let me see here. Based on the information provided, it seems like the issue is with the route policy on R1 not properly discarding the 192.168.3.0/24 route. I'm thinking option C might be the right answer, as the policy should be set for import rather than export.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelica
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by this one. The wording seems a bit ambiguous, and I'm not sure if the issue is with the prefix list, the OSPF configuration, or something else. I'll need to re-read the question and options a few times.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marcos
7 months ago
This looks like a tricky OSPF routing policy question. I'll need to carefully review the options and think through the OSPF route advertisement process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
7 months ago
I’m leaning towards option C, but I’m confused about whether it applies to just ticket1 or if it also impacts other instances like ticket2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marjory
7 months ago
Option C mentions observable change in tissue coloration, which might mean it's more extreme than just typical head banging, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dacia
11 months ago
This question is like a game of 'Guess the OSPF policy'. I'm just going to roll the dice and pick an answer!
upvoted 0 times
Samira
10 months ago
Actually, I think it might be B) Router R1 should be configured as an OSPF 'asbr'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardine
10 months ago
I'm going with D) The policy was likely not 'committed' after creation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
11 months ago
No, I believe it's C) The policy 'reject' should be set for import rather than export.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ammie
11 months ago
I think the answer is A) The prefix list reject should be '192.168.3.0/16 exact'.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mari
11 months ago
Option A? Really? Trying to match the /16 prefix when the network is /24? Talk about overkill!
upvoted 0 times
Rosalind
10 months ago
D) The policy was likely not 'committed' after creation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danica
11 months ago
C) The policy 'reject' should be set for import rather than export.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lelia
11 months ago
A) The prefix list reject should be '192.168.3.0/16 exact'.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Raina
12 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option B. Router R1 should be configured as an OSPF ASBR to handle this route policy.
upvoted 0 times
Marci
10 months ago
I'm not sure about that. I still believe Option B is the best solution for this issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alva
11 months ago
But what about Option A? Maybe the prefix list reject should be adjusted to '192.168.3.0/16 exact'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herschel
11 months ago
I think Option B is the correct choice. Router R1 needs to be configured as an OSPF ASBR.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jin
12 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I'm going with Option E. OSPF doesn't allow import policies, so this scenario is not possible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
1 year ago
I think Option C is the way to go. The policy should be set for import, not export, to discard the route on R1.
upvoted 0 times
Maurine
11 months ago
I think Option D could also be a possibility. Maybe the policy was not committed after creation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mohammad
12 months ago
I agree, Option C seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Emilio
1 year ago
Maybe the policy was not committed after creation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
1 year ago
Option D is the correct answer. The policy needs to be committed after creation for it to take effect.
upvoted 0 times
Paola
11 months ago
You're right, option D is the correct answer. The policy needs to be committed after creation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
11 months ago
Actually, I think option D is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
11 months ago
No, I believe option C is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pok
11 months ago
I think the correct answer is option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Clemencia
1 year ago
I believe the policy should be set for import rather than export.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
1 year ago
I think the problem is with the prefix list reject.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel