MENU
Click the exhibit button.
Router R2 advertises the network 192.168.3.0/24 to router R1 via OSPF. A route policy has been constructed to discard the route on router R1; however, it is not working. What is the problem?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium 4A0-113 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
40 comments · newest first
VI
Vivan
11 months ago
The reject should be set for import, not export.
LE
Lelia
11 months ago
Wait, OSPF can't use import policies? That's surprising!
GO
Golda
11 months ago
I disagree, OSPF can use import policies.
CA
Casandra
11 months ago
Definitely, it has to be committed!
EL
Eleni
12 months ago
I think the policy wasn't committed after creation.
LO
Lonna
12 months ago
I recall that sometimes policies just need to be committed after creation, but I can't remember if that's the case here.
LY
Lyndia
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused about whether OSPF can even use import policies. I feel like I read something about that.
MA
Mariann
1 year ago
I think I practiced a question similar to this where the policy needed to be set for import instead of export.
RE
Reita
1 year ago
I remember something about prefix lists, but I'm not sure if it should be exact or if a broader range would work.
RE
Reyes
1 year ago
I've got a good feeling about this one. The key is understanding how OSPF route advertisements work and where the policy should be applied. I'm leaning towards option D - the policy was likely not committed after creation, which would explain why it's not working as expected.
LU
Luz
1 year ago
Okay, let me see here. Based on the information provided, it seems like the issue is with the route policy on R1 not properly discarding the 192.168.3.0/24 route. I'm thinking option C might be the right answer, as the policy should be set for import rather than export.
AN
Angelica
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by this one. The wording seems a bit ambiguous, and I'm not sure if the issue is with the prefix list, the OSPF configuration, or something else. I'll need to re-read the question and options a few times.
MA
Marcos
1 year ago
This looks like a tricky OSPF routing policy question. I'll need to carefully review the options and think through the OSPF route advertisement process.
KA
Kasandra
1 year ago
I’m leaning towards option C, but I’m confused about whether it applies to just ticket1 or if it also impacts other instances like ticket2.
MA
Marjory
1 year ago
Option C mentions observable change in tissue coloration, which might mean it's more extreme than just typical head banging, right?
DA
Dacia
1 year ago
This question is like a game of 'Guess the OSPF policy'. I'm just going to roll the dice and pick an answer!
SA
Samira
1 year ago
Actually, I think it might be B) Router R1 should be configured as an OSPF 'asbr'.
BE
Bernardine
1 year ago
I'm going with D) The policy was likely not 'committed' after creation.
TH
Theodora
1 year ago
No, I believe it's C) The policy 'reject' should be set for import rather than export.
AM
Ammie
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) The prefix list reject should be '192.168.3.0/16 exact'.
MA
Mari
1 year ago
Option A? Really? Trying to match the /16 prefix when the network is /24? Talk about overkill!
RO
Rosalind
1 year ago
D) The policy was likely not 'committed' after creation.
DA
Danica
1 year ago
C) The policy 'reject' should be set for import rather than export.
LE
Lelia
1 year ago
A) The prefix list reject should be '192.168.3.0/16 exact'.
RA
Raina
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards Option B. Router R1 should be configured as an OSPF ASBR to handle this route policy.
MA
Marci
1 year ago
I'm not sure about that. I still believe Option B is the best solution for this issue.
AL
Alva
1 year ago
But what about Option A? Maybe the prefix list reject should be adjusted to '192.168.3.0/16 exact'.
HE
Herschel
1 year ago
I think Option B is the correct choice. Router R1 needs to be configured as an OSPF ASBR.
JI
Jin
1 year ago
This is a tricky one, but I'm going with Option E. OSPF doesn't allow import policies, so this scenario is not possible.
HE
Heike
2 years ago
I think Option C is the way to go. The policy should be set for import, not export, to discard the route on R1.
MA
Maurine
1 year ago
I think Option D could also be a possibility. Maybe the policy was not committed after creation.
MO
Mohammad
1 year ago
I agree, Option C seems like the most logical choice.
EM
Emilio
2 years ago
Maybe the policy was not committed after creation.
RO
Rory
2 years ago
Option D is the correct answer. The policy needs to be committed after creation for it to take effect.
PA
Paola
1 year ago
You're right, option D is the correct answer. The policy needs to be committed after creation.
MI
Minna
1 year ago
Actually, I think option D is the correct answer.
HA
Hannah
1 year ago
No, I believe option C is the correct answer.
PO
Pok
1 year ago
I think the correct answer is option A.
CL
Clemencia
2 years ago
I believe the policy should be set for import rather than export.
EM
Emilio
2 years ago
I think the problem is with the prefix list reject.