Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nokia Exam 4A0-113 Topic 9 Question 81 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-113 exam
Question #: 81
Topic #: 9
[All 4A0-113 Questions]

Click the exhibit button.

Router R2 advertises the network 192.168.3.0/24 to router R1 via OSPF. A route policy has been constructed to discard the route on router R1; however, it is not working. What is the problem?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Dacia
1 months ago
This question is like a game of 'Guess the OSPF policy'. I'm just going to roll the dice and pick an answer!
upvoted 0 times
Bernardine
3 days ago
I'm going with D) The policy was likely not 'committed' after creation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
16 days ago
No, I believe it's C) The policy 'reject' should be set for import rather than export.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ammie
17 days ago
I think the answer is A) The prefix list reject should be '192.168.3.0/16 exact'.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mari
1 months ago
Option A? Really? Trying to match the /16 prefix when the network is /24? Talk about overkill!
upvoted 0 times
Rosalind
13 days ago
D) The policy was likely not 'committed' after creation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danica
19 days ago
C) The policy 'reject' should be set for import rather than export.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lelia
21 days ago
A) The prefix list reject should be '192.168.3.0/16 exact'.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Raina
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option B. Router R1 should be configured as an OSPF ASBR to handle this route policy.
upvoted 0 times
Marci
8 days ago
I'm not sure about that. I still believe Option B is the best solution for this issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alva
19 days ago
But what about Option A? Maybe the prefix list reject should be adjusted to '192.168.3.0/16 exact'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herschel
1 months ago
I think Option B is the correct choice. Router R1 needs to be configured as an OSPF ASBR.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jin
2 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I'm going with Option E. OSPF doesn't allow import policies, so this scenario is not possible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
2 months ago
I think Option C is the way to go. The policy should be set for import, not export, to discard the route on R1.
upvoted 0 times
Maurine
1 months ago
I think Option D could also be a possibility. Maybe the policy was not committed after creation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mohammad
2 months ago
I agree, Option C seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Emilio
2 months ago
Maybe the policy was not committed after creation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
2 months ago
Option D is the correct answer. The policy needs to be committed after creation for it to take effect.
upvoted 0 times
Paola
21 days ago
You're right, option D is the correct answer. The policy needs to be committed after creation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
23 days ago
Actually, I think option D is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
1 months ago
No, I believe option C is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pok
1 months ago
I think the correct answer is option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Clemencia
2 months ago
I believe the policy should be set for import rather than export.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
3 months ago
I think the problem is with the prefix list reject.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel