Nokia Exam 4A0-113 Topic 5 Question 62 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-113 exam

Question #: 62
Topic #: 5

Click on the exhibit.

The route table on router R2 shows the system address of router R5 but it does not show any of the interfaces from the non-OSPF area.

What may be causing this?

A'asbr' is missing from router R1's configuration.

BRouter R1 needs to have an export policy added to it.

CRouter R5 does not have an export policy for these prefixes.

DRouter R1 needs to have an import policy added to it.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Truman at Oct 19, 2023, 08:57 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-113 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Lonny

1 months ago

Hmm, this is a tough one. I'm going to guess C, since R5 might not be configured to advertise those prefixes properly. Networking can be such a headache sometimes!

upvoted 0 times

Beckie

2 days ago

Yeah, that could definitely be the issue. Networking can be so tricky to troubleshoot.

upvoted 0 times

...

Johnna

5 days ago

User 3: I'm with Johnna on this one. D seems like the most likely cause.

upvoted 0 times

...

Huey

12 days ago

I think you might be right, R5 probably needs to have an export policy for those prefixes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Erasmo

15 days ago

User 2: Erasmo, I disagree. I believe it could be D, Router R1 needs to have an import policy added to it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lindsey

17 days ago

User 1: I think it might be A, 'asbr' is missing from router R1's configuration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Theresia

2 months ago

Haha, I bet someone put 'asbr' in the wrong place again. Classic networking exam question. I'd go with B - R1 needs an export policy to push those routes out.

upvoted 0 times

Mitsue

13 days ago

It's crucial to have the right policies in place for proper routing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annabelle

19 days ago

I think the export policy on R1 is definitely the missing piece here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tamra

1 months ago

Yeah, it's a common mistake to overlook the export policy on R1.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lasandra

2 months ago

I agree, 'asbr' always seems to cause issues in these scenarios.

upvoted 0 times

...

Evette

2 months ago

But could it also be that Router R5 does not have an export policy for these prefixes?

upvoted 0 times

...

Clay

2 months ago

I agree with Rodolfo, maybe 'asbr' is missing from router R1.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luther

2 months ago

Ooh, tricky one. I'm leaning towards D - R1 needs an import policy to bring in those non-OSPF prefixes. Gotta make sure your routing policies are all set up properly!

upvoted 0 times

Lelia

1 months ago

Yeah, I agree. It's crucial to have the right policies in place for proper routing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joaquin

1 months ago

I think you're right, D does make sense. Import policies are important for routing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Regenia

2 months ago

Yeah, setting up import policies correctly is key for routing between different areas.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kris

2 months ago

I agree, D seems like the most likely solution. Import policies are crucial for proper routing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Amira

2 months ago

Hmm, I think the answer is C. Router R5 likely doesn't have an export policy set up to advertise those prefixes. That's probably why they're not showing up on R2's route table.

upvoted 0 times