Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nokia 4A0-113 Exam - Topic 5 Question 62 Discussion

Click on the exhibit.The route table on router R2 shows the system address of router R5 but it does not show any of the interfaces from the non-OSPF area.What may be causing this?
C) Router R5 does not have an export policy for these prefixes.
A) 'asbr' is missing from router R1's configuration.
B) Router R1 needs to have an export policy added to it.
D) Router R1 needs to have an import policy added to it.

Nokia 4A0-113 Exam - Topic 5 Question 62 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-113 exam
Question #: 62
Topic #: 5
[All 4A0-113 Questions]

Click on the exhibit.

The route table on router R2 shows the system address of router R5 but it does not show any of the interfaces from the non-OSPF area.

What may be causing this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Truman at Oct 19, 2023, 08:57 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-113 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Charlesetta
8 months ago
I didn't know export policies could cause this!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorriane
8 months ago
Totally agree, R1's config seems crucial here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Taryn
8 months ago
Wait, why would R1 need an import policy? That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
9 months ago
I think it's more about the export policy on R5.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
9 months ago
Sounds like 'asbr' is definitely the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
9 months ago
I vaguely remember that if an ASBR is missing, it could cause issues with routes not showing up. Is that what they mean by router R1's configuration?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lachelle
9 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the differences between import and export policies. I feel like router R1 might need an import policy, but I can't recall the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
9 months ago
I think I saw a similar question about routing policies in our practice tests. Maybe it's related to router R5 not exporting the prefixes correctly?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
9 months ago
I remember something about OSPF areas and how they interact, but I'm not sure if it's the export policy or the ASBR that's the issue here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mertie
9 months ago
I'm a bit confused here. The question is asking about the route table on R2, but the options are talking about R1 and R5. I'll need to make sure I understand the full context before I can confidently select an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Britt
10 months ago
Okay, I've got a strategy. I'll start by looking at the options and eliminating the ones that don't seem quite right. Then I'll focus on the remaining options and try to determine which one is the most likely cause of the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
10 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not sure if the issue is with R1's configuration or R5's. I'll need to carefully review the options and think through the possible scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
10 months ago
I think the key here is to look at the configuration of the routers, especially R1 and R5. The question is asking about what might be causing the missing interfaces from the non-OSPF area, so I'll need to focus on the export and import policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
10 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. Is it asking about the best overall solution, or just the specific technology that would work best with cloud services? I want to make sure I'm interpreting this correctly before I select an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Penney
10 months ago
Okay, let's see. I think the key here is understanding the lifespan of the authorization. I'm leaning towards option B, but I'll double-check the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
10 months ago
I think the key here is understanding the relative costs and benefits of each approach. Time to do some analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lacresha
10 months ago
Ah, I think I've got it! Option A looks like the right choice here. It's checking the "valid not after" date of the client certificate, which should confirm that it's valid until 2023. I'm feeling confident about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
10 months ago
I remember discussing how statistics from a sample are often used to estimate population parameters. So maybe option C is the right one?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tough one. I'm going to guess C, since R5 might not be configured to advertise those prefixes properly. Networking can be such a headache sometimes!
upvoted 0 times
Tarra
1 year ago
I agree, it's always a challenge to figure out what's causing routing issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
1 year ago
Yeah, that could definitely be the issue. Networking can be so tricky to troubleshoot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
1 year ago
User 3: I'm with Johnna on this one. D seems like the most likely cause.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
1 year ago
I think you might be right, R5 probably needs to have an export policy for those prefixes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
1 year ago
User 2: Erasmo, I disagree. I believe it could be D, Router R1 needs to have an import policy added to it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
1 year ago
User 1: I think it might be A, 'asbr' is missing from router R1's configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Theresia
1 year ago
Haha, I bet someone put 'asbr' in the wrong place again. Classic networking exam question. I'd go with B - R1 needs an export policy to push those routes out.
upvoted 0 times
Mitsue
1 year ago
It's crucial to have the right policies in place for proper routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annabelle
1 year ago
I think the export policy on R1 is definitely the missing piece here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
1 year ago
Yeah, it's a common mistake to overlook the export policy on R1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lasandra
1 year ago
I agree, 'asbr' always seems to cause issues in these scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Evette
1 year ago
But could it also be that Router R5 does not have an export policy for these prefixes?
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
1 year ago
I agree with Rodolfo, maybe 'asbr' is missing from router R1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luther
1 year ago
Ooh, tricky one. I'm leaning towards D - R1 needs an import policy to bring in those non-OSPF prefixes. Gotta make sure your routing policies are all set up properly!
upvoted 0 times
Lelia
1 year ago
Yeah, I agree. It's crucial to have the right policies in place for proper routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joaquin
1 year ago
I think you're right, D does make sense. Import policies are important for routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Regenia
1 year ago
Yeah, setting up import policies correctly is key for routing between different areas.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
1 year ago
I agree, D seems like the most likely solution. Import policies are crucial for proper routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Amira
1 year ago
Hmm, I think the answer is C. Router R5 likely doesn't have an export policy set up to advertise those prefixes. That's probably why they're not showing up on R2's route table.
upvoted 0 times
Maryann
1 year ago
We should check the configurations on both routers to see where the problem lies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
1 year ago
That's a good point, it could be a combination of both issues causing the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sena
1 year ago
But what if Router R1 also needs to have an import policy added?
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
1 year ago
I agree, it seems like Router R5 needs to have an export policy in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rodolfo
1 year ago
I think the issue might be with router R1's configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel