I remember that TCP is generally not used for multicast because it’s connection-oriented, but I’m not sure if that means it can’t provide reliability for multicast.
Okay, let me think this through. Multicast is one-to-many, so TCP's reliable, connection-oriented nature doesn't really fit. And option D seems too extreme - multicast does need some reliability, even if it's not as robust as unicast. I'll go with C, the RTP solution.
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I know UDP is unreliable, so option B can't be right. But I'm not totally sure about the other options. I might have to guess on this one.
I'm pretty sure TCP doesn't provide reliable transport for multicast, so I can rule out option A. I think the answer is likely C, since RTP is a higher-level protocol that can add reliability to multicast.
I'm a bit confused on this one. I know multicast is different from unicast, but I'm not sure about the specifics of how reliability works. I'll have to eliminate the options that I'm more certain are wrong, then take an educated guess on the rest.
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The USB flash drive might be cheaper, but 600 GB is a lot of data for a flash drive. The SCSI tape backup system could work, but it might be overkill for a coffee shop's needs.
Rosalia
3 months agoFlorinda
3 months agoKatlyn
3 months agoKathrine
4 months agoAntione
4 months agoAlyce
4 months agoEmiko
4 months agoGilma
4 months agoCarmela
5 months agoChristiane
5 months agoJesusa
5 months agoLindsey
5 months agoHyun
5 months agoDouglass
5 months agoMartina
5 months agoCatarina
5 months agoOzell
5 months agoShaunna
10 months agoStefany
10 months agoJaime
8 months agoMaxima
9 months agoKris
9 months agoShelba
10 months agoMaurine
8 months agoShelba
9 months agoSherita
9 months agoJeffrey
9 months agoDominque
10 months agoZoila
11 months agoLai
9 months agoSonia
10 months agoJerry
10 months agoKatina
10 months agoGabriele
11 months agoHerminia
11 months agoEvangelina
11 months ago