Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nokia 4A0-108 Exam - Topic 5 Question 73 Discussion

When forwarding a multicast frame, normal behavior for a LAN switch (without IGMP snooping enabled) is to forward the frame as if it were:
C) A unicast frame with a known source in the forwarding table
A) A unicast frame with a known destination in the forwarding table
B) A unicast frame with an unknown destination in the forwarding table
D) A unicast frame with an unknown source in the forwarding table

Nokia 4A0-108 Exam - Topic 5 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-108 exam
Question #: 73
Topic #: 5
[All 4A0-108 Questions]

When forwarding a multicast frame, normal behavior for a LAN switch (without IGMP snooping enabled) is to forward the frame as if it were:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Glenna at Aug 08, 2023, 10:47 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-108 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Audry
8 months ago
I agree with B, that's how switches usually handle it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
8 months ago
Nah, it's A for sure, can't be B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannetta
8 months ago
Wait, so it doesn't know the destination? That's surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Martin
9 months ago
I thought it was A, but B makes more sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
9 months ago
It's definitely B, unicast with unknown destination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bong
9 months ago
I’m leaning towards option B, but I’m confused about how switches differentiate between multicast and unicast without IGMP snooping.
upvoted 0 times
...
Curt
9 months ago
I feel like it might be option A, but I can't recall if IGMP snooping changes that behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tom
9 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I think the answer was about how switches handle unknown destinations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louann
10 months ago
I think multicast frames are treated like unicast frames with an unknown destination, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
10 months ago
This seems like a straightforward requirement, so I'd recommend including it in the current sprint since the CPQ B2B Commerce Connector is already set up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
10 months ago
I'm pretty confident on this one. The two tasks Citrix recommends are enabling access to the primary datacenter and blocking access to the Disaster Recovery datacenter. Terminating sessions or blocking the primary datacenter wouldn't be the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordie
10 months ago
This seems like a pretty straightforward integration question. I'd start by considering the scale of the data transfer - 90,000 students is a lot, so I'd lean towards an automated solution like an ETL tool or Salesforce Data Loader.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erinn
10 months ago
This seems straightforward to me. The key is that the company gets paid within 30 days, so the accounts receivable would be the total sales in that 30-day period. Since the sales are $4,000 per day, the total in 30 days is $120,000. And since 55% is paid by check, the accounts receivable would be $120,000 * 0.55 = $66,000. So the answer is A) $120,000.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madelyn
1 year ago
Gotta love these tricky multicast questions. My money's on Option B - it's the closest to how a switch would actually handle a multicast frame without any special configuration.
upvoted 0 times
Elza
1 year ago
C) A unicast frame with a known source in the forwarding table
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
1 year ago
B) A unicast frame with an unknown destination in the forwarding table
upvoted 0 times
...
Burma
1 year ago
A) A unicast frame with a known destination in the forwarding table
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chaya
1 year ago
Haha, this reminds me of that time I accidentally configured IGMP snooping on my home router. Goodbye, Netflix for the whole family!
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
1 year ago
I was leaning towards Option A, but now I'm not so sure. Multicast frames are a bit of a special case, so Option B is probably the better choice here.
upvoted 0 times
Reynalda
1 year ago
Hmm, you may be right. Option B does make more sense for forwarding multicast frames on a LAN switch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
1 year ago
Actually, I believe Option B is the correct choice because multicast frames are treated like unicast frames with unknown destinations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
1 year ago
I agree, multicast frames are forwarded as if they were unicast frames with known destinations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
1 year ago
I think Option A is correct because multicast frames are treated like unicast frames with known destinations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrie
1 year ago
User 4: Yeah, I think Option B is the right answer for forwarding multicast frames.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graciela
1 year ago
User 3: I agree, multicast frames are a special case, so Option B makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abel
1 year ago
User 2: I was also considering Option A, but now I'm leaning towards Option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusa
1 year ago
User 1: I think Option A is the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paulene
1 year ago
I'm not sure about this. I think the answer might be C) A unicast frame with a known source in the forwarding table. Can someone explain why it's not the correct answer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Osvaldo
1 year ago
I agree with Iesha. When a switch forwards a multicast frame without IGMP snooping, it treats it like a unicast frame with a known destination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
1 year ago
Option B makes the most sense to me. Forwarding a multicast frame is like handling an unknown unicast destination, since the switch doesn't have a specific entry for the multicast address in its forwarding table.
upvoted 0 times
Alpha
1 year ago
D) A unicast frame with an unknown source in the forwarding table
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, that makes sense. The switch doesn't have a specific entry for the multicast address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
1 year ago
C) A unicast frame with a known source in the forwarding table
upvoted 0 times
...
Dolores
1 year ago
User 1: I think option B is correct too. It's like dealing with an unknown unicast destination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
1 year ago
B) A unicast frame with an unknown destination in the forwarding table
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
1 year ago
A) A unicast frame with a known destination in the forwarding table
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Iesha
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) A unicast frame with a known destination in the forwarding table.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel