Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nokia Exam 4A0-108 Topic 5 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-108 exam
Question #: 73
Topic #: 5
[All 4A0-108 Questions]

When forwarding a multicast frame, normal behavior for a LAN switch (without IGMP snooping enabled) is to forward the frame as if it were:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Madelyn
2 months ago
Gotta love these tricky multicast questions. My money's on Option B - it's the closest to how a switch would actually handle a multicast frame without any special configuration.
upvoted 0 times
Elza
22 days ago
C) A unicast frame with a known source in the forwarding table
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
27 days ago
B) A unicast frame with an unknown destination in the forwarding table
upvoted 0 times
...
Burma
1 months ago
A) A unicast frame with a known destination in the forwarding table
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chaya
2 months ago
Haha, this reminds me of that time I accidentally configured IGMP snooping on my home router. Goodbye, Netflix for the whole family!
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
2 months ago
I was leaning towards Option A, but now I'm not so sure. Multicast frames are a bit of a special case, so Option B is probably the better choice here.
upvoted 0 times
Reynalda
6 days ago
Hmm, you may be right. Option B does make more sense for forwarding multicast frames on a LAN switch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
8 days ago
Actually, I believe Option B is the correct choice because multicast frames are treated like unicast frames with unknown destinations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
13 days ago
I agree, multicast frames are forwarded as if they were unicast frames with known destinations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
15 days ago
I think Option A is correct because multicast frames are treated like unicast frames with known destinations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrie
20 days ago
User 4: Yeah, I think Option B is the right answer for forwarding multicast frames.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graciela
1 months ago
User 3: I agree, multicast frames are a special case, so Option B makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abel
2 months ago
User 2: I was also considering Option A, but now I'm leaning towards Option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusa
2 months ago
User 1: I think Option A is the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paulene
2 months ago
I'm not sure about this. I think the answer might be C) A unicast frame with a known source in the forwarding table. Can someone explain why it's not the correct answer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Osvaldo
2 months ago
I agree with Iesha. When a switch forwards a multicast frame without IGMP snooping, it treats it like a unicast frame with a known destination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
2 months ago
Option B makes the most sense to me. Forwarding a multicast frame is like handling an unknown unicast destination, since the switch doesn't have a specific entry for the multicast address in its forwarding table.
upvoted 0 times
Alpha
1 months ago
D) A unicast frame with an unknown source in the forwarding table
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
1 months ago
User 2: Yeah, that makes sense. The switch doesn't have a specific entry for the multicast address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
2 months ago
C) A unicast frame with a known source in the forwarding table
upvoted 0 times
...
Dolores
2 months ago
User 1: I think option B is correct too. It's like dealing with an unknown unicast destination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
2 months ago
B) A unicast frame with an unknown destination in the forwarding table
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
2 months ago
A) A unicast frame with a known destination in the forwarding table
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Iesha
2 months ago
I think the answer is A) A unicast frame with a known destination in the forwarding table.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel