Nokia 4A0-107 Exam - Topic 7 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-107 exam

Question #: 39
Topic #: 7

Refer to the exhibit.

According to the SAP-ingress QoS policy shown, which of the following statements about packets processed by policer 6 is TRUE?

AAll forwarded packets will be in-profile

BPackets forwarded above CIR will be marked out-of-profile and the rest will be in-profile

CExcess packets that arrive within a burst larger than CBS will be forwarded as out-of-profile

DAll forwarded packets will be out-of-profile

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Gregoria at Feb 08, 2023, 11:00 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-107 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Raul

5 months ago

A can't be true, there's always some packets out-of-profile.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gracia

6 months ago

Wait, all forwarded packets out-of-profile? That sounds wrong!

upvoted 0 times

...

Polly

6 months ago

C seems off to me, not sure about that one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rebeca

6 months ago

Totally agree with B! Makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fletcher

6 months ago

I think B is the right answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marsha

6 months ago

I'm leaning towards option C because it seems to match what I studied about how burst sizes affect packet forwarding, but I'm still a bit confused.

upvoted 0 times

...

Darrin

6 months ago

I feel like I read that excess packets can be forwarded as out-of-profile, but I can't recall the specifics about the burst size.

upvoted 0 times

...

Latrice

6 months ago

I think I practiced a similar question where packets above the CIR were marked out-of-profile, so maybe option B is correct?

upvoted 0 times

...

Rolf

7 months ago

I remember something about how the CIR and CBS work together, but I'm not entirely sure if all packets can be in-profile.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lauran

7 months ago

I'm pretty sure it's option C, the "lanz enable" command. That sounds like the most straightforward way to enable LANZ on a switch.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marica

7 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know we covered data sources in class, but I'm having trouble remembering the specifics. I'll have to think it through step-by-step.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nancey

7 months ago

This is a good question to test our understanding of the Solaris 11 AI system. I'll carefully read through each option and select the two that are correct based on my knowledge.

upvoted 0 times

...

Charlette

7 months ago

This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the impact on users during normal business hours.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jose

11 months ago

Wait, are we sure this isn't a trick question? I mean, who even uses 'policer 6' anymore? The SAP team must be running out of ideas.

upvoted 0 times

Meaghan

10 months ago

Arlette: Yeah, it does seem like a straightforward answer based on the exhibit

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlette

10 months ago

User 2: I agree, that seems to be the most logical choice based on the information provided

upvoted 0 times

...

Daniel

11 months ago

User 1: I think the answer is B) Packets forwarded above CIR will be marked out-of-profile and the rest will be in-profile

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharen

12 months ago

Ha, I bet the person who wrote option A has never actually worked with a real-world QoS policy. All packets forwarded in-profile? Yeah, right, good one!

upvoted 0 times

Beckie

10 months ago

Leigha: Yeah, marking packets above CIR as out-of-profile sounds more practical in a real-world scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leigha

11 months ago

User 2: I agree, that seems too good to be true. Option B makes more sense to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maryann

11 months ago

User 1: Option A is definitely not realistic. Who would believe that all forwarded packets will be in-profile?

upvoted 0 times

...

Noah

12 months ago

Ooh, option C is a tricky one! I can see how the burst size could play a role, but I'm not sure if that's the complete story here. Better double-check the policy details.

upvoted 0 times

Virgilio

11 months ago

User 3: It's always good to double-check the policy details to make sure we understand how it works.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eden

11 months ago

User 2: I agree, the burst size could definitely impact whether packets are considered in or out of profile.

upvoted 0 times

...

Harrison

11 months ago

User 1: I think option C makes sense, the burst size is important for determining if packets are in or out of profile.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brittni

1 year ago

Hmm, option D sounds tempting, but I think that's a bit too simplistic. The policy clearly states that the excess packets will be marked out-of-profile, not all of them.

upvoted 0 times

Annelle

10 months ago

Paris: Yes, that makes sense. Option B it is.

upvoted 0 times

...

Denae

10 months ago

User 3: So, option B is the correct one then.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paris

10 months ago

User 2: I disagree, the policy mentions marking excess packets out-of-profile.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lucia

10 months ago

User 1: I think option D is correct.

upvoted 0 times

...

Teri

10 months ago

User 4: Yes, that seems to be the case based on the policy shown.

upvoted 0 times

...

Abraham

10 months ago

User 3: So, option B is the correct one then.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shalon

10 months ago

User 2: I disagree, the policy mentions marking excess packets out-of-profile.

upvoted 0 times

...

Novella

11 months ago

User 1: I think option D is correct.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nan

1 year ago

Aha, the correct answer is B! Packets above the CIR will be marked out-of-profile, while the rest will be in-profile. This makes perfect sense given the policy details.

upvoted 0 times