MENU
Refer to the exhibit.
According to the SAP-ingress QoS policy shown, which of the following statements about packets processed by policer 6 is TRUE?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium 4A0-107 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
44 comments · newest first
RA
Raul
11 months ago
A can't be true, there's always some packets out-of-profile.
GR
Gracia
12 months ago
Wait, all forwarded packets out-of-profile? That sounds wrong!
PO
Polly
12 months ago
C seems off to me, not sure about that one.
RE
Rebeca
1 year ago
Totally agree with B! Makes sense.
FL
Fletcher
1 year ago
I think B is the right answer.
MA
Marsha
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards option C because it seems to match what I studied about how burst sizes affect packet forwarding, but I'm still a bit confused.
DA
Darrin
1 year ago
I feel like I read that excess packets can be forwarded as out-of-profile, but I can't recall the specifics about the burst size.
LA
Latrice
1 year ago
I think I practiced a similar question where packets above the CIR were marked out-of-profile, so maybe option B is correct?
RO
Rolf
1 year ago
I remember something about how the CIR and CBS work together, but I'm not entirely sure if all packets can be in-profile.
LA
Lauran
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure it's option C, the "lanz enable" command. That sounds like the most straightforward way to enable LANZ on a switch.
MA
Marica
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know we covered data sources in class, but I'm having trouble remembering the specifics. I'll have to think it through step-by-step.
NA
Nancey
1 year ago
This is a good question to test our understanding of the Solaris 11 AI system. I'll carefully read through each option and select the two that are correct based on my knowledge.
CH
Charlette
1 year ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the impact on users during normal business hours.
JO
Jose
1 year ago
Wait, are we sure this isn't a trick question? I mean, who even uses 'policer 6' anymore? The SAP team must be running out of ideas.
ME
Meaghan
1 year ago
Arlette: Yeah, it does seem like a straightforward answer based on the exhibit
AR
Arlette
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, that seems to be the most logical choice based on the information provided
DA
Daniel
1 year ago
User 1: I think the answer is B) Packets forwarded above CIR will be marked out-of-profile and the rest will be in-profile
SH
Sharen
1 year ago
Ha, I bet the person who wrote option A has never actually worked with a real-world QoS policy. All packets forwarded in-profile? Yeah, right, good one!
BE
Beckie
1 year ago
Leigha: Yeah, marking packets above CIR as out-of-profile sounds more practical in a real-world scenario.
LE
Leigha
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, that seems too good to be true. Option B makes more sense to me.
MA
Maryann
1 year ago
User 1: Option A is definitely not realistic. Who would believe that all forwarded packets will be in-profile?
NO
Noah
1 year ago
Ooh, option C is a tricky one! I can see how the burst size could play a role, but I'm not sure if that's the complete story here. Better double-check the policy details.
VI
Virgilio
1 year ago
User 3: It's always good to double-check the policy details to make sure we understand how it works.
ED
Eden
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, the burst size could definitely impact whether packets are considered in or out of profile.
HA
Harrison
1 year ago
User 1: I think option C makes sense, the burst size is important for determining if packets are in or out of profile.
BR
Brittni
2 years ago
Hmm, option D sounds tempting, but I think that's a bit too simplistic. The policy clearly states that the excess packets will be marked out-of-profile, not all of them.
AN
Annelle
1 year ago
Paris: Yes, that makes sense. Option B it is.
DE
Denae
1 year ago
User 3: So, option B is the correct one then.
PA
Paris
1 year ago
User 2: I disagree, the policy mentions marking excess packets out-of-profile.
LU
Lucia
1 year ago
User 1: I think option D is correct.
TE
Teri
1 year ago
User 4: Yes, that seems to be the case based on the policy shown.
AB
Abraham
1 year ago
User 3: So, option B is the correct one then.
SH
Shalon
1 year ago
User 2: I disagree, the policy mentions marking excess packets out-of-profile.
NO
Novella
1 year ago
User 1: I think option D is correct.
NA
Nan
2 years ago
Aha, the correct answer is B! Packets above the CIR will be marked out-of-profile, while the rest will be in-profile. This makes perfect sense given the policy details.
GW
Gwenn
1 year ago
Thanks for clarifying, now it makes sense!
RE
Renea
1 year ago
Yes, that's correct. Packets above the CIR will be marked out-of-profile.
FR
Fredric
1 year ago
That's correct! Packets above the CIR will be marked out-of-profile.
JO
Jose
1 year ago
No, I believe the correct answer is B) Packets forwarded above CIR will be marked out-of-profile and the rest will be in-profile.
NI
Nina
1 year ago
I think the correct answer is A) All forwarded packets will be in-profile.
ST
Stephane
1 year ago
I think you're right, option B does seem to be the correct answer.
LO
Loreen
2 years ago
Hmm, that makes sense too. I guess we need to carefully analyze the exhibit to determine the correct answer.
ME
Melvin
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) Excess packets that arrive within a burst larger than CBS will be forwarded as out-of-profile.
LO
Loreen
2 years ago
I think the answer is B) Packets forwarded above CIR will be marked out-of-profile and the rest will be in-profile.