Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nokia 4A0-107 Exam - Topic 5 Question 34 Discussion

Posted by Serina on Oct 22, 2022 at 12:03 PM

Click the exhibit button below. Given the scheduler-policy (below), which of the following can be done to guarantee that the best-effort traffic receives its configured CIR value?

Suggested Answer: C

Get Premium 4A0-107 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
34 comments · newest first
DE
Derick 11 months ago
I disagree, B is definitely the safest choice here.
JO
Jose 12 months ago
D seems like a solid option too.
BE
Belen 12 months ago
Wait, changing to 1? That sounds risky...
JA
James 1 year ago
No way, B is already set to guarantee it!
KA
Kate 1 year ago
I think changing the CIR-level to 8 makes sense.
PA
Pa 1 year ago
I vaguely remember that lowering the CIR-level could impact performance, so I'm hesitant about option C. It seems risky.
DO
Doretha 1 year ago
I feel like the best-effort traffic should already be getting its CIR if nothing's changed, but I can't recall if that's always true.
BU
Bulah 1 year ago
I think I practiced a similar question where we had to adjust queue weights. Changing the AF queue's weight might be a valid option here.
KI
Kip 1 year ago
I remember something about CIR values and how they affect traffic prioritization, but I'm not sure if changing it to 8 is the right move.
QU
Quentin 1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward coding question. I'll need to carefully review the information provided to determine the appropriate code to use.
KI
Kimberely 1 year ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the different lists that could be causing the duplicate subscriber key.
BE
Beula 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. The question mentions a backlog of account management requests, so I'm wondering if Identity as a Service (IDaaS) might be a better fit to handle that workload. I'll have to think about the pros and cons of each option.
LA
Lashon 1 year ago
I don't know, guys. I'm just gonna go with option B and hope for the best. Why make things more complicated than they need to be?
DI
Dick 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lashon
Sounds good to me, let's go with option B and see what happens.
GE
Gerald 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lashon
I agree, let's keep it simple and stick with option B.
HO
Horace 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lashon
I think option B is the safest choice.
EV
Eveline 1 year ago
Lashon
LA
Lashon 1 year ago
I don't know, guys. I'm just gonna go with option B and hope for the best. Why make things more complicated than they need to be?
SA
Salina 1 year ago
This is tricky. I think the key is in the CIR-weight value for the different queues. Maybe we need to adjust that instead of the CIR-level?
DU
Dulce 1 year ago
↳ replying to Salina
Let's try adjusting both values and see which one works better for guaranteeing the best-effort traffic's CIR.
DO
Donte 1 year ago
↳ replying to Salina
That's a good point. Maybe we should consider both options before making a decision.
MA
Marjory 1 year ago
↳ replying to Salina
But wouldn't changing the CIR-weight value of the AF queue to 0 also guarantee the best-effort traffic receives its CIR?
MA
Maryrose 1 year ago
↳ replying to Salina
I think we should change the CIR-level value for the best-effort queue to 1.
TA
Tarra 2 years ago
Wait, what do you mean by 'guarantee'? Isn't the best-effort traffic already supposed to get its configured CIR value?
NO
Noemi 1 year ago
↳ replying to Tarra
B) Do not change anything; it is already guaranteed to receive its CIR
FA
Fausto 1 year ago
↳ replying to Tarra
A) Change the CIR-level value for the best-effort queue to 8.
KR
Kristeen 2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure if changing the CIR-level value for the best-effort queue is the right approach. Shouldn't we focus on the CIR-weight value instead?
WI
Wilford 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kristeen
User 4: Changing the CIR-weight value for the AF queue might be the key to ensuring proper traffic management.
CA
Casey 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kristeen
User 3: Maybe we should consider both options to guarantee the best-effort traffic receives its CIR value.
NA
Natalya 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kristeen
User 2: But what about changing the CIR-level value for the best-effort queue?
AN
Annelle 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kristeen
User 1: I think we should focus on the CIR-weight value for the AF queue.
KA
Karon 2 years ago
But if we change it to 1, won't that decrease the guaranteed CIR value for best-effort traffic?
LO
Loren 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C) Change the CIR-level value for the best-effort queue to 1.
KA
Karon 2 years ago
I think the answer is A) Change the CIR-level value for the best-effort queue to 8.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel