Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nokia 4A0-107 Exam - Topic 5 Question 34 Discussion

Click the exhibit button below. Given the scheduler-policy (below), which of the following can be done to guarantee that the best-effort traffic receives its configured CIR value?
C) Change the CIR-level value for the best-effort queue to 1.
A) Change the CIR-level value for the best-effort queue to 8.
B) Do not change anything; it is already guaranteed to receive its CIR
D) Change the CIR-weight value of the AF queue to 0.

Nokia 4A0-107 Exam - Topic 5 Question 34 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-107 exam
Question #: 34
Topic #: 5
[All 4A0-107 Questions]

Click the exhibit button below. Given the scheduler-policy (below), which of the following can be done to guarantee that the best-effort traffic receives its configured CIR value?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Serina at Oct 22, 2022, 12:03 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-107 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Derick
7 months ago
I disagree, B is definitely the safest choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
7 months ago
D seems like a solid option too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
7 months ago
Wait, changing to 1? That sounds risky...
upvoted 0 times
...
James
8 months ago
No way, B is already set to guarantee it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
8 months ago
I think changing the CIR-level to 8 makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pa
8 months ago
I vaguely remember that lowering the CIR-level could impact performance, so I'm hesitant about option C. It seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doretha
8 months ago
I feel like the best-effort traffic should already be getting its CIR if nothing's changed, but I can't recall if that's always true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
8 months ago
I think I practiced a similar question where we had to adjust queue weights. Changing the AF queue's weight might be a valid option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kip
8 months ago
I remember something about CIR values and how they affect traffic prioritization, but I'm not sure if changing it to 8 is the right move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
8 months ago
This seems like a straightforward coding question. I'll need to carefully review the information provided to determine the appropriate code to use.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberely
8 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the different lists that could be causing the duplicate subscriber key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beula
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. The question mentions a backlog of account management requests, so I'm wondering if Identity as a Service (IDaaS) might be a better fit to handle that workload. I'll have to think about the pros and cons of each option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashon
1 year ago
I don't know, guys. I'm just gonna go with option B and hope for the best. Why make things more complicated than they need to be?
upvoted 0 times
Dick
12 months ago
Sounds good to me, let's go with option B and see what happens.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
1 year ago
I agree, let's keep it simple and stick with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Horace
1 year ago
I think option B is the safest choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eveline
1 year ago
Lashon
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashon
1 year ago
I don't know, guys. I'm just gonna go with option B and hope for the best. Why make things more complicated than they need to be?
upvoted 0 times
...
Salina
1 year ago
This is tricky. I think the key is in the CIR-weight value for the different queues. Maybe we need to adjust that instead of the CIR-level?
upvoted 0 times
Dulce
11 months ago
Let's try adjusting both values and see which one works better for guaranteeing the best-effort traffic's CIR.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
11 months ago
That's a good point. Maybe we should consider both options before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marjory
11 months ago
But wouldn't changing the CIR-weight value of the AF queue to 0 also guarantee the best-effort traffic receives its CIR?
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryrose
12 months ago
I think we should change the CIR-level value for the best-effort queue to 1.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tarra
1 year ago
Wait, what do you mean by 'guarantee'? Isn't the best-effort traffic already supposed to get its configured CIR value?
upvoted 0 times
Noemi
1 year ago
B) Do not change anything; it is already guaranteed to receive its CIR
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
1 year ago
A) Change the CIR-level value for the best-effort queue to 8.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kristeen
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure if changing the CIR-level value for the best-effort queue is the right approach. Shouldn't we focus on the CIR-weight value instead?
upvoted 0 times
Wilford
1 year ago
User 4: Changing the CIR-weight value for the AF queue might be the key to ensuring proper traffic management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casey
1 year ago
User 3: Maybe we should consider both options to guarantee the best-effort traffic receives its CIR value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalya
1 year ago
User 2: But what about changing the CIR-level value for the best-effort queue?
upvoted 0 times
...
Annelle
1 year ago
User 1: I think we should focus on the CIR-weight value for the AF queue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Karon
1 year ago
But if we change it to 1, won't that decrease the guaranteed CIR value for best-effort traffic?
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C) Change the CIR-level value for the best-effort queue to 1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karon
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) Change the CIR-level value for the best-effort queue to 8.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel