Which of the following statements about the token buckets of a policer is FALSE?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium 4A0-107 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
43 comments · newest first
KA
Karan
11 months ago
C sounds right, MBS means no packets get through.
MY
My
12 months ago
B is true, CIR does influence packet profiles.
LI
Lizbeth
12 months ago
Wait, are we sure about A? Seems odd.
LE
Levi
1 year ago
I agree, A is misleading for sure.
LA
Lavina
1 year ago
A is definitely false, CIR does affect forwarding rates.
LI
Ligia
1 year ago
I’m pretty confident that packets above the PIR are marked as out-of-profile, so D seems true. That leaves A or C as the possible false ones.
PA
Page
1 year ago
I vaguely recall that when the PIR bucket is full, it doesn't just discard all packets. I feel like C could be the false statement here.
DA
Dalene
1 year ago
I think I came across a similar question where the CIR did affect packet classification. So, I might lean towards A being false.
MA
Marion
1 year ago
I remember studying the token bucket algorithm, but I'm not sure if the CIR really has no influence on the forwarding rate. That seems off.
IS
Isabella
1 year ago
I've worked with similar Kubernetes security configurations before, so I feel confident I can handle this. I'll just need to double-check the details to make sure I don't miss anything.
MO
Monte
1 year ago
I've got this! The two required parameters are startAbsolute and intervalLength. The question is asking about the Cisco Stealthwatch Top Alarm Host v1 API, so those parameters make the most sense to me.
FL
Fletcher
1 year ago
Okay, let me re-read the question and the exhibit closely to understand the key details.
KI
Kimbery
1 year ago
This is a good one. I'm going to read through the options and think about how the prefix list needs to be structured to allow the 10.0.0.0/8 prefixes while still filtering the rest.
CA
Carolynn
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The Business Architecture Maturity Model is a new concept for me, and I'm not entirely clear on what it assesses. I'll have to think this through and make an educated guess.
CA
Carey
1 year ago
Ah, the token bucket, the unsung hero of networking. Keeping the data traffic in line, one packet at a time. It's like a strict parent with a never-ending supply of tokens - 'You can only have so many, young packets!'
LE
Lelia
1 year ago
D) PIR bucket forwards packets that arrive with rates above PIR as out-of-profile.
BO
Bobbye
1 year ago
C) The policer discards all incoming packets when PIR bucket reaches the MBS level.
CL
Clare
1 year ago
B) The CIR influences whether a packet is considered high-profile or low-profile.
LE
Leonor
1 year ago
A) The CIR has no influence on the forwarding rate of the policer traffic.
AL
Alecia
1 year ago
D) Ah, this is the correct statement. The PIR bucket forwards packets that arrive with rates above PIR as out-of-profile.
FL
Florinda
1 year ago
C) The policer discards all incoming packets when PIR bucket reaches the MBS level.
CO
Cordelia
1 year ago
B) The CIR influences whether a packet is considered high-profile or low-profile.
CA
Carri
1 year ago
A) The CIR has no influence on the forwarding rate of the policer traffic.
DA
Daron
1 year ago
C) This one is false. The policer doesn't discard all incoming packets when the PIR bucket reaches the MBS level, it just marks them as out-of-profile.
ER
Erasmo
1 year ago
B) Yes, this is the right answer. The CIR does influence whether a packet is considered high-profile or low-profile.
YA
Yasuko
1 year ago
C) The policer discards all incoming packets when PIR bucket reaches the MBS level.
AN
Andra
1 year ago
B) The CIR influences whether a packet is considered high-profile or low-profile.
FL
Flo
1 year ago
A) The CIR has no influence on the forwarding rate of the policer traffic.
ES
Estrella
1 year ago
C) The policer discards all incoming packets when PIR bucket reaches the MBS level.
SH
Sheldon
1 year ago
B) The CIR influences whether a packet is considered high-profile or low-profile.
OT
Otis
1 year ago
A) The CIR has no influence on the forwarding rate of the policer traffic.
EA
Earleen
2 years ago
A) That's not correct. The CIR definitely has an influence on the forwarding rate of the policer traffic.
TO
Tonja
1 year ago
User 4: PIR bucket forwards packets that arrive with rates above PIR as out-of-profile.
EL
Elke
1 year ago
User 3: The policer discards all incoming packets when PIR bucket reaches the MBS level.
LY
Lyla
1 year ago
User 2: That's not correct. The CIR definitely has an influence on the forwarding rate of the policer traffic.
KA
Kasandra
1 year ago
User 1: The CIR has no influence on the forwarding rate of the policer traffic.
GE
Gerald
1 year ago
User 4: The PIR bucket forwards packets that arrive with rates above PIR as out-of-profile.
OL
Ollie
1 year ago
User 3: The policer discards all incoming packets when PIR bucket reaches the MBS level.
LE
Levi
1 year ago
User 2: Actually, that's not correct. The CIR does influence the forwarding rate.
MI
Mitzie
1 year ago
User 1: The CIR has no influence on the forwarding rate of the policer traffic.
RE
Rex
2 years ago
I see your point, but I still think A) is the false statement because the CIR does affect the forwarding rate.
AL
Albina
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the false statement is C) The policer discards all incoming packets when PIR bucket reaches the MBS level.
RE
Rex
2 years ago
I think the false statement is A) The CIR has no influence on the forwarding rate of the policer traffic.