Which of the following is an example of something that CAN be done with hierarchical policing (CFHP) but CANNOT be done with standalone policers?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium 4A0-107 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
15 comments · newest first
SH
Shenika
1 month ago
C is definitely the best option here.
CA
Camellia
2 months ago
C allows for flexibility with multiple policers.
AS
Ashton
2 months ago
D is good, but C feels more comprehensive.
NI
Nickolas
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards D. It controls overall rates better.
TY
Tyisha
2 months ago
I agree, C makes sense. Standalone can't do that.
LE
Lenna
2 months ago
I think C is the right choice. It shows how bandwidth can be shared.
RO
Rosalind
2 months ago
Not sure about C, sounds a bit too good to be true.
DU
Dudley
3 months ago
Wait, can standalone policers really do none of this?
GE
German
3 months ago
A is a solid option too, but not the best.
YO
Yolande
3 months ago
I think D makes more sense, though.
AN
Annita
3 months ago
C is definitely the right choice!
KA
Kaycee
3 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the differences between standalone policers and hierarchical ones. I think option D might be the right choice, but I’m not entirely certain.
ME
Melodie
4 months ago
I feel like I might have seen a question similar to this before, but I can't recall if it was about buffering or rate-limiting.
KA
Kattie
4 months ago
I think option C sounds familiar because it talks about reallocating bandwidth, which is something we discussed in class about hierarchical setups.
CR
Crista
4 months ago
I remember studying how hierarchical policing allows for more flexible bandwidth management, but I'm not sure which option specifically highlights that.