MENU
Click the exhibit.
A Carrier Supporting Carrier (CSC) VPRN is configured on an Nokia 7750 SR for a customer carrier offering VPRN services. Which of the following about this configuration is FALSE?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium 4A0-106 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
35 comments · newest first
JO
Jose
11 months ago
I thought loop detection was always on, why turn it off?
CE
Celestina
11 months ago
C is definitely correct, that's how you set up CSC.
KE
Keneth
11 months ago
Wait, is D really necessary? Sounds off to me.
NA
Nana
11 months ago
Totally agree, B is a must if ASNs are the same!
AG
Agustin
12 months ago
A is true, you need that eBGP session for VPRN.
TA
Tarra
12 months ago
I feel confident about the iBGP session and the 'family vpn-ipv4' command, but I wonder if there's a specific scenario where that might not apply.
QU
Quentin
1 year ago
The 'carrier-carrier-vpn' command sounds familiar, but I might be mixing it up with other configurations.
MI
Mila
1 year ago
I think the loop detection command is something I practiced, but I can't recall if it's actually needed when the same AS number is used.
LA
Lavonda
1 year ago
I remember studying the eBGP session setup, but I'm not entirely sure if the 'advertise-label vpn-ipv4' command is always necessary in this context.
CO
Colene
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused on the differences between these two systems. I'll need to re-read the question and options carefully to make sure I understand what's being asked.
WI
Wilford
1 year ago
I'm uncertain, but I think spinning servers like that could fit with either Denial of Service or Eclipse. I really need to clarify those terms!
ME
Melvin
1 year ago
I remember practicing a similar question where cash deposits over a certain amount triggered a reporting requirement. Option B seems like a clear case for filing, right?
MA
Marge
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by this question. I know Azure Defender is a security service, but I'm not sure exactly which resources it can protect. I'll need to do some quick research on the capabilities of Azure Defender before answering.
MA
Malinda
1 year ago
Disabling loop detection? That's a bold move, Cotton. Let's see if it pays off for them.
SI
Simona
1 year ago
It's definitely a bold choice that could have consequences.
CH
Cherelle
1 year ago
I wonder if there are any alternative solutions to avoid loops.
KA
Kasandra
1 year ago
But it might be necessary in this specific configuration.
MA
Malcolm
1 year ago
I agree, disabling loop detection seems risky.
EL
Elvera
1 year ago
Using the 'family vpn-ipv4' command to exchange end-customer routes directly between PEs is a nice touch. It simplifies the configuration, though I'd want to ensure it doesn't introduce any performance issues.
DA
Dacia
1 year ago
Earleen: Good point, we don't want any unexpected issues to pop up.
EA
Earleen
1 year ago
User 2: It's definitely convenient, but we should keep an eye on performance just in case.
AN
Annalee
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, using the 'family vpn-ipv4' command does simplify things.
VE
Veronique
1 year ago
Ah, the 'carrier-carrier-vpn' command is the key to configuring the VPRN as a CSC. Glad they provided that detail in the options.
KA
Kathryn
1 year ago
C: Disabling loop detection with the 'loop-detect off' command can be helpful when the customer carrier uses the same AS in different sites.
TR
Trevor
1 year ago
B: I always make sure to use the 'advertise-label vpn-ipv4' command to enable the advertisement of VPN-IPv4 routes.
AN
Anglea
1 year ago
A: I agree, that 'carrier-carrier-vpn' command is crucial for configuring the VPRN as a CSC.
SH
Sharmaine
1 year ago
Hmm, the 'advertise-label vpn-ipv4' command makes sense for enabling VPN-IPv4 route advertisement. I wonder if there's any other way to handle the same scenario without that command.
EL
Eloisa
2 years ago
But doesn't option B make sense because it disables loop detection?
RI
Rima
2 years ago
The CSC VPRN configuration seems straightforward, but I'm curious about the loop detection functionality. Disabling it could be risky if the customer's sites have the same AS number.
DA
Dannie
1 year ago
D: Maybe there are other ways to prevent loops without completely disabling the loop detection functionality.
MA
Martin
1 year ago
C: A: Yes, it could potentially cause issues if not carefully managed.
JE
Jerlene
1 year ago
B: But won't that increase the risk of loops in the network?
JO
Josphine
1 year ago
A: I think disabling loop detection with the 'loop-detect off' command is necessary for the customer carrier with the same AS number.
AN
Antione
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D.
EL
Eloisa
2 years ago
I think the answer is B.