Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nokia 4A0-106 Exam - Topic 3 Question 64 Discussion

Posted by Vilma on May 23, 2024 at 01:17 AM

Which of the following about an Nokia 7750 SR MP-BGP update is FALSE? Assume default behavior.

Suggested Answer: D

Get Premium 4A0-106 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
42 comments · newest first
DE
Devorah 11 months ago
I’m surprised by how complex this is, I thought it was simpler!
AR
Ariel 11 months ago
Wait, can there really be multiple Route Targets?
IE
Iesha 11 months ago
Totally agree with you, C seems off.
TO
Toshia 11 months ago
I think C is the false one, you can have multiple RD.
TW
Twana 12 months ago
A is true, MPLS labels are used for VPRN.
VE
Venita 12 months ago
I definitely remember that MP-BGP updates can include both traditional and MP-BGP attributes, but I can't remember if that's true for all cases.
JI
Jimmie 1 year ago
I feel like there was something about Route Distinguishers being unique per route, but I can't recall if that's a strict rule or not.
VA
Van 1 year ago
I think I saw a practice question about Route Targets, and it mentioned that multiple Route Targets can be associated with a single route.
AM
Amie 1 year ago
I remember that MP-BGP updates can carry MPLS labels, but I'm not sure if it's always the service label for a VPRN.
JE
Jeniffer 1 year ago
This is a good opportunity to demonstrate my knowledge of MPLS and BGP. I'll carefully consider each option and eliminate the incorrect ones.
AH
Ahmed 1 year ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of the question. Can someone clarify what "default behavior" means in this context? I want to make sure I'm interpreting it correctly.
GA
Gail 1 year ago
The key here is understanding the default behavior of an Nokia 7750 SR device. Once you have that down, the answer should be pretty clear.
KR
Krystina 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the details of MP-BGP updates. I'll need to review my notes carefully before attempting this.
JU
Juliann 1 year ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward BGP question. I think I can handle this one.
ED
Edda 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I know we need to create some kind of virtual network, but I'm not familiar with all the different options like ether stubs or virtual bridges. I'll have to think this through carefully.
FR
Freeman 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. The wording is a bit confusing, but I'll give it my best shot.
BO
Bobbye 1 year ago
Upgrading the pricing tier might be the quickest fix, but I want to explore the other options first to minimize costs.
DA
Daisy 1 year ago
Hmm, the Nokia 7750 SR... Makes me wonder if it's compatible with my Nokia 3310. Gotta keep up with the tech, you know?
GR
Gregg 1 year ago
↳ replying to Daisy
E) Traditional BGP attributes and MP-BGP attributes are present in an MP-BGP update.
WE
Werner 1 year ago
↳ replying to Daisy
B) There can be multiple Route Targets per route in an MP-BGP update.
AS
Ashton 1 year ago
↳ replying to Daisy
A) An MP-BGP update carries an MPLS label that is used as the service label for a VPRN.
AL
Alba 1 year ago
B is an interesting option. Multiple Route Targets per route? That sounds like a recipe for chaos!
KA
Kathrine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Alba
Lorean: Agreed, keeping track of all those Route Targets would be a challenge.
LO
Lorean 1 year ago
↳ replying to Alba
User 2: Yeah, it could definitely lead to some chaos in the network.
ET
Ettie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Alba
User 1: I think B is correct. Multiple Route Targets per route can be confusing.
MI
Mike 1 year ago
E is a tricky one. I wonder if the traditional BGP attributes are also present in the MP-BGP update?
AL
Alberta 1 year ago
↳ replying to Mike
D) On a specific PE, the MP-BGP updates for prefixes from a single VPRN carry different labels.
FA
Fannie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Mike
C) There can only be one Route Distinguisher per route in an MP-BGP update.
RE
Renay 1 year ago
↳ replying to Mike
B) There can be multiple Route Targets per route in an MP-BGP update.
NI
Niesha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Mike
User 3: D) On a specific PE, the MP-BGP updates for prefixes from a single VPRN carry different labels.
AL
Alyssa 1 year ago
↳ replying to Mike
User 2: B) There can be multiple Route Targets per route in an MP-BGP update.
JA
Jaclyn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Mike
A) An MP-BGP update carries an MPLS label that is used as the service label for a VPRN.
NI
Nickolas 1 year ago
↳ replying to Mike
User 1: A) An MP-BGP update carries an MPLS label that is used as the service label for a VPRN.
DA
Darell 2 years ago
I think C is the correct answer. There can only be one Route Distinguisher per route in an MP-BGP update.
AN
Antonio 2 years ago
Option D seems a bit confusing. Shouldn't the labels for a single VPRN be the same on a specific PE?
KA
Kallie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Antonio
E) Traditional BGP attributes and MP-BGP attributes are present in an MP-BGP update.
ME
Melodie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Antonio
C) There can only be one Route Distinguisher per route in an MP-BGP update.
BE
Beatriz 1 year ago
↳ replying to Antonio
B) There can be multiple Route Targets per route in an MP-BGP update.
BL
Blythe 1 year ago
↳ replying to Antonio
A) An MP-BGP update carries an MPLS label that is used as the service label for a VPRN.
WI
Willodean 2 years ago
Hmm, that's interesting. I see your point. Let's review the options again.
LA
Latricia 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the false statement is D) On a specific PE, the MP-BGP updates for prefixes from a single VPRN carry different labels.
WI
Willodean 2 years ago
I think the false statement is C) There can only be one Route Distinguisher per route in an MP-BGP update.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel