Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nokia 4A0-106 Exam - Topic 2 Question 38 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-106 exam
Question #: 38
Topic #: 2
[All 4A0-106 Questions]

If Route Reflector 1 (RR1) is used for Internet routes, and Route Reflector 2 (RR2) is used for VPN routes, which of the following is TRUE?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Oretha at Dec 11, 2022, 01:56 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-106 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Beata
5 months ago
Nope, RR1 is strictly IPv4, no VPN stuff there.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
6 months ago
I think RR2 can do both IPv4 and VPN-IPv4.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
6 months ago
Wait, RR2 can't support IPv4? That’s surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Albina
6 months ago
Totally agree with that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Esteban
6 months ago
RR1 handles only IPv4 routes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Narcisa
6 months ago
I’m confused about the address families; I thought RR2 would only deal with VPN-IPv4, but now I’m not so sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
6 months ago
This question feels familiar; I think I practiced something similar where RR1 was limited to IPv4.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
6 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I think RR2 should support both IPv4 and VPN-IPv4 since it’s handling VPN routes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
6 months ago
I remember that RR1 is mainly for Internet routes, so I think it might only support IPv4.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
7 months ago
Whew, this is a tough one. I'm going to need to review the data model and access controls to make sure I'm selecting the most appropriate solution. Gotta be careful here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
7 months ago
Okay, let me break this down step-by-step. The key is to focus on the differences, not the similarities. I think I can narrow it down to the two most relevant options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
7 months ago
I think I've got a good strategy for this. I'll read through the options, eliminate any that don't seem to fit, and then choose the one that best completes the sentence based on the information provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edmond
7 months ago
Okay, let's see. If there are no price levels assigned on the Customer record, then it must default to one of the other options. I'm leaning towards Alternate Price 1, but I'll double-check my understanding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
12 months ago
I'm going with C. It just makes sense that RR1 would handle both IPv4 and VPN-IPv4 since it's dealing with the broader Internet routes.
upvoted 0 times
Shelia
10 months ago
User1: Exactly. It's all about organizing the BGP sessions efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
11 months ago
User2: Yeah, that makes sense. RR2 would then handle just the VPN routes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nancey
11 months ago
User1: I think C is correct too. RR1 should handle both IPv4 and VPN-IPv4.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sharen
12 months ago
Haha, I bet the answer is C. Why would you have separate RRs if they were only going to handle one address family each? That would be like having two TVs to watch the same channel.
upvoted 0 times
Anthony
10 months ago
User1: Exactly, that's why C is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evan
10 months ago
User3: So, BGP sessions between RR1 and the PEs support both IPv4 and VPN-IPv4 address families?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
11 months ago
User2: Yeah, it wouldn't make sense to have separate RRs for different address families.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
11 months ago
User1: I think you're right, C seems like the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilberto
11 months ago
B) BGP sessions established between RR1 and the PEs support the IPv4 address family only.
upvoted 0 times
...
Narcisa
11 months ago
Exactly! Having separate RRs for different address families makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
12 months ago
C) BGP sessions established between RR1 and the PEs support IPv4 and VPN-IPv4 address families.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annette
12 months ago
A) BGP sessions established between RR2 and the PEs support IPv4 and VPN-IPv4 address families.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Celia
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. If RR2 is handling VPN routes, shouldn't the BGP sessions with PEs support both IPv4 and VPN-IPv4 address families? *scratches head*
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
12 months ago
I agree with Stevie. RR1 is dedicated to Internet routes, so the address family should be IPv4 only.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
1 year ago
Option B seems logical since RR1 is handling Internet routes, so the BGP sessions should only support the IPv4 address family.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edgar
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think C is also a possibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
1 year ago
I agree with Dorian, BGP sessions between RR2 and PEs support IPv4 and VPN-IPv4.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorian
1 year ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel