Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nokia Exam 4A0-106 Topic 2 Question 38 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-106 exam
Question #: 38
Topic #: 2
[All 4A0-106 Questions]

If Route Reflector 1 (RR1) is used for Internet routes, and Route Reflector 2 (RR2) is used for VPN routes, which of the following is TRUE?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Oretha at Dec 11, 2022, 01:56 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-106 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Mattie
2 months ago
I'm going with C. It just makes sense that RR1 would handle both IPv4 and VPN-IPv4 since it's dealing with the broader Internet routes.
upvoted 0 times
Shelia
16 days ago
User1: Exactly. It's all about organizing the BGP sessions efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
18 days ago
User2: Yeah, that makes sense. RR2 would then handle just the VPN routes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nancey
1 months ago
User1: I think C is correct too. RR1 should handle both IPv4 and VPN-IPv4.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sharen
2 months ago
Haha, I bet the answer is C. Why would you have separate RRs if they were only going to handle one address family each? That would be like having two TVs to watch the same channel.
upvoted 0 times
Anthony
8 days ago
User1: Exactly, that's why C is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evan
16 days ago
User3: So, BGP sessions between RR1 and the PEs support both IPv4 and VPN-IPv4 address families?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
27 days ago
User2: Yeah, it wouldn't make sense to have separate RRs for different address families.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
28 days ago
User1: I think you're right, C seems like the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilberto
29 days ago
B) BGP sessions established between RR1 and the PEs support the IPv4 address family only.
upvoted 0 times
...
Narcisa
1 months ago
Exactly! Having separate RRs for different address families makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
2 months ago
C) BGP sessions established between RR1 and the PEs support IPv4 and VPN-IPv4 address families.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annette
2 months ago
A) BGP sessions established between RR2 and the PEs support IPv4 and VPN-IPv4 address families.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Celia
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. If RR2 is handling VPN routes, shouldn't the BGP sessions with PEs support both IPv4 and VPN-IPv4 address families? *scratches head*
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
2 months ago
I agree with Stevie. RR1 is dedicated to Internet routes, so the address family should be IPv4 only.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
2 months ago
Option B seems logical since RR1 is handling Internet routes, so the BGP sessions should only support the IPv4 address family.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edgar
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C is also a possibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
2 months ago
I agree with Dorian, BGP sessions between RR2 and PEs support IPv4 and VPN-IPv4.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorian
2 months ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel