Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nokia 4A0-106 Exam - Topic 1 Question 75 Discussion

What is wrong with the VPRN configuration applied on this Nokia 7750 SR?
C) The router-id command should not be used in this context.
A) The VPRN ID must match the value 101 used in the vrf-target command.
B) The VPRN ID must match the value 101 used in the route-distinguisher command.
D) The ''no shutdown'' command must be configured for the VPRN to be operationally UP.

Nokia 4A0-106 Exam - Topic 1 Question 75 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-106 exam
Question #: 75
Topic #: 1
[All 4A0-106 Questions]

What is wrong with the VPRN configuration applied on this Nokia 7750 SR?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Aracelis at Sep 13, 2024, 10:43 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-106 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Jerrod
9 months ago
I’m not sure about that, I’ve seen it work without it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilene
9 months ago
Totally agree, the no shutdown command is a must!
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamela
10 months ago
Wait, can you really use a router-id here? Sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lillian
10 months ago
I thought it was the route-distinguisher that needed to match!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
10 months ago
The VPRN ID should match the vrf-target value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
10 months ago
I feel like the "no shutdown" command is crucial for the VPRN to work, but I can't remember if it's always required in every configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latia
11 months ago
The router-id command seems out of place here, but I practiced a similar question where it was actually necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
11 months ago
I remember something about the vrf-target command being important, but I can't recall if it has to match the VPRN ID or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Halina
11 months ago
I think the VPRN ID needs to match the route-distinguisher value, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the only requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Onita
11 months ago
Ah, the "no shutdown" command is a good catch. That's probably the issue, so I'll go with option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
11 months ago
Hmm, the router-id command seems out of place here. I'm leaning towards option C, but I want to make sure I understand the context before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
11 months ago
The VPRN ID needs to match the value used in other commands, so I'm thinking it's either option A or B. I'll double-check the syntax to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
11 months ago
This looks like a tricky VPRN configuration question. I'll need to carefully review the details and options to determine what's wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
2 years ago
Wait, the VPRN ID has to match the route-distinguisher? That's just plain silly. It's like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole!
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
2 years ago
I remember this one from my studies. The VPRN ID has to match the vrf-target command, not the route-distinguisher. Easy mistake to make, though.
upvoted 0 times
Quentin
2 years ago
C) The router-id command should not be used in this context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marguerita
2 years ago
B) The VPRN ID must match the value 101 used in the route-distinguisher command.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
2 years ago
A) The VPRN ID must match the value 101 used in the vrf-target command.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wilda
2 years ago
I believe the problem might also be with the 'no shutdown' command not being configured for the VPRN to be operational.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
2 years ago
Don't forget the 'no shutdown' command! Without that, the VPRN won't be operationally up, and that's a common issue.
upvoted 1 times
Sharen
2 years ago
D) The 'no shutdown' command must be configured for the VPRN to be operationally UP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
2 years ago
C) The router-id command should not be used in this context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thora
2 years ago
B) The VPRN ID must match the value 101 used in the route-distinguisher command.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mel
2 years ago
A) The VPRN ID must match the value 101 used in the vrf-target command.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maia
2 years ago
I agree with Estrella, the VPRN ID should match the value 101 in the vrf-target command for it to work properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
2 years ago
I think the issue is with the VPRN ID not matching the value 101 in the configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doretha
2 years ago
Hmm, I think the router-id command shouldn't be used in this context. It seems like a bit of a red herring to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
2 years ago
The VPRN ID must match the value 101 used in the route-distinguisher command. That's the correct answer here.
upvoted 0 times
Noah
2 years ago
Yes, you are correct. That's the right answer for this configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
2 years ago
I think the VPRN ID must match the value 101 used in the route-distinguisher command.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel