MENU
What is wrong with the VPRN configuration applied on this Nokia 7750 SR?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium 4A0-106 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
30 comments · newest first
JE
Jerrod
11 months ago
I’m not sure about that, I’ve seen it work without it.
IL
Ilene
11 months ago
Totally agree, the no shutdown command is a must!
PA
Pamela
11 months ago
Wait, can you really use a router-id here? Sounds off.
LI
Lillian
11 months ago
I thought it was the route-distinguisher that needed to match!
CA
Carey
12 months ago
The VPRN ID should match the vrf-target value.
CA
Caprice
12 months ago
I feel like the "no shutdown" command is crucial for the VPRN to work, but I can't remember if it's always required in every configuration.
LA
Latia
1 year ago
The router-id command seems out of place here, but I practiced a similar question where it was actually necessary.
TW
Twana
1 year ago
I remember something about the vrf-target command being important, but I can't recall if it has to match the VPRN ID or not.
HA
Halina
1 year ago
I think the VPRN ID needs to match the route-distinguisher value, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the only requirement.
ON
Onita
1 year ago
Ah, the "no shutdown" command is a good catch. That's probably the issue, so I'll go with option D.
FL
Flo
1 year ago
Hmm, the router-id command seems out of place here. I'm leaning towards option C, but I want to make sure I understand the context before answering.
QU
Quentin
1 year ago
The VPRN ID needs to match the value used in other commands, so I'm thinking it's either option A or B. I'll double-check the syntax to be sure.
DO
Dominque
1 year ago
This looks like a tricky VPRN configuration question. I'll need to carefully review the details and options to determine what's wrong.
SE
Selma
2 years ago
Wait, the VPRN ID has to match the route-distinguisher? That's just plain silly. It's like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole!
SE
Selma
2 years ago
I remember this one from my studies. The VPRN ID has to match the vrf-target command, not the route-distinguisher. Easy mistake to make, though.
QU
Quentin
2 years ago
C) The router-id command should not be used in this context.
MA
Marguerita
2 years ago
B) The VPRN ID must match the value 101 used in the route-distinguisher command.
LI
Lilli
2 years ago
A) The VPRN ID must match the value 101 used in the vrf-target command.
WI
Wilda
2 years ago
I believe the problem might also be with the 'no shutdown' command not being configured for the VPRN to be operational.
IV
Ivette
2 years ago
Don't forget the 'no shutdown' command! Without that, the VPRN won't be operationally up, and that's a common issue.
SH
Sharen
2 years ago
D) The 'no shutdown' command must be configured for the VPRN to be operationally UP.
ST
Staci
2 years ago
C) The router-id command should not be used in this context.
TH
Thora
2 years ago
B) The VPRN ID must match the value 101 used in the route-distinguisher command.
ME
Mel
2 years ago
A) The VPRN ID must match the value 101 used in the vrf-target command.
MA
Maia
2 years ago
I agree with Estrella, the VPRN ID should match the value 101 in the vrf-target command for it to work properly.
ES
Estrella
2 years ago
I think the issue is with the VPRN ID not matching the value 101 in the configuration.
DO
Doretha
2 years ago
Hmm, I think the router-id command shouldn't be used in this context. It seems like a bit of a red herring to me.
MI
Ming
2 years ago
The VPRN ID must match the value 101 used in the route-distinguisher command. That's the correct answer here.
NO
Noah
2 years ago
Yes, you are correct. That's the right answer for this configuration.
GE
German
2 years ago
I think the VPRN ID must match the value 101 used in the route-distinguisher command.