Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nokia 4A0-105 Exam - Topic 7 Question 83 Discussion

Posted by Gilma on Mar 21, 2024 at 09:56 AM

Click on the exhibit below.

In the following diagram, traffic ingressing on SAP 1/2/3:1 will be passed to the layer-2 DPI device for inspection based on a filter policy applied to the ingress of the SAP. What feature should be enabled on SAP 1/2/1:100 and SAP 1/2/2:100 to ensure that incorrect information is not populated in the FDB of VPLS 1?

Suggested Answer: D

Get Premium 4A0-105 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
37 comments · newest first
AN
Angella 11 months ago
Not sure about that, seems risky to disable learning completely.
AL
Alishia 11 months ago
Totally agree, disabling learning makes sense.
EN
Ena 11 months ago
Surprised that 'discard-unknown' is even a choice!
MA
Maxima 11 months ago
I think a MAC filter is a better option here.
FA
Farrah 12 months ago
Learning should definitely be disabled on those SAPs.
CA
Carey 12 months ago
I’m leaning towards the MAC filter option, but I’m a bit confused about whether an IP filter could also work in this scenario.
MU
Murray 1 year ago
I feel like using the 'discard-unknown' feature was mentioned in our study materials, but I can't recall the exact context.
KI
King 1 year ago
I think we practiced a similar question where applying a MAC filter helped limit learning. That might be relevant for this one too.
TA
Talia 1 year ago
I remember something about disabling learning to avoid FDB issues, but I'm not sure if that's the best approach here.
AL
Aleisha 1 year ago
The question mentions a filter policy on the ingress of the SAP, so maybe we need to apply a specific type of filter to the other SAPs to prevent FDB issues.
TR
Trina 1 year ago
I think the answer is to disable learning on the SAPs connected to the DPI device, but I'm not 100% certain that's the right approach.
MA
Maryann 1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through. The traffic is ingressing on SAP 1/2/3:1 and going to a DPI device, so we need to prevent incorrect information from populating the FDB of VPLS 1.
CR
Cruz 1 year ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the key details before answering.
VA
Vallie 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards the "discard-unknown" feature, but I want to double-check that against the other options to make sure I'm not missing something.
HY
Hyun 1 year ago
Okay, let me see here. I know TMMi provides a framework for test process improvement, but I can't quite recall the details about the maturity levels and architecture. I'll have to read through the options closely.
VI
Vinnie 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about the difference between "Professional and consultant services" and "Transportation term contracts." I'll need to review my notes to make sure I understand the precise definitions.
WI
William 1 year ago
I'm not so sure about the version of the CloudFormation template. Would updating it really be necessary for a successful deployment?
MI
Michael 1 year ago
I bet the correct answer is hidden in the image somewhere, like a Where's Waldo puzzle. Time to break out the magnifying glass and get to work!
ES
Esteban 1 year ago
↳ replying to Michael
Let's go with option D then. It seems like the most logical choice.
LU
Ludivina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Michael
I agree, enabling the 'discard-unknown' feature on the SAPs connected to the DPI device would limit MAC learning on the port.
FA
Fallon 1 year ago
↳ replying to Michael
I think option D is the correct answer.
AR
Arletta 1 year ago
Wow, this question really separates the network engineers from the network ninjas. If you can't figure this one out, you might as well just become a professional couch surfer.
JE
Jesusita 1 year ago
↳ replying to Arletta
D) The SAPs connected to the DPI should be configured with the 'discard-unknown' feature to limit MAC learning on the port
BU
Burma 1 year ago
↳ replying to Arletta
B) A MAC filter should be applied to both SAPs connected to the DPI to limit MAC learning on the port
TR
Trinidad 1 year ago
↳ replying to Arletta
A) Learning should be disabled on both SAPs connected to the DPI device to prevent FDB instability
MA
Malcom 1 year ago
I'm torn between B and D. Both seem to address the issue of MAC learning, but D seems more specific to the task at hand. Maybe I should just roll a dice and hope for the best!
ST
Stefan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Malcom
Seems like it. Let's go with D for now.
AS
Ashlee 1 year ago
↳ replying to Malcom
So, are we all leaning towards D then?
RE
Refugia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Malcom
Yeah, I agree. B is more about limiting MAC addresses in general, while D is focused on preventing incorrect information in the FDB.
AR
Aron 1 year ago
↳ replying to Malcom
I think D is the better option here. It specifically mentions limiting MAC learning on the port.
DA
Dannette 2 years ago
A seems like a reasonable option, but disabling learning completely might be a bit overkill. D sounds like a more targeted approach to the problem.
SO
Son 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dannette
User 2: I agree, option D seems like a better solution.
TA
Tatum 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dannette
User 1: I think option A is too extreme.
MA
Margurite 2 years ago
But wouldn't disabling learning on the SAPs prevent FDB instability?
RE
Rebbecca 2 years ago
I think the correct answer is D. Enabling the 'discard-unknown' feature on the SAPs connected to the DPI device will prevent unknown MAC addresses from being learned and added to the FDB, which helps maintain FDB stability.
FI
Filiberto 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D.
MA
Margurite 2 years ago
I think the answer is B.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel