New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nokia 4A0-105 Exam - Topic 7 Question 72 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-105 exam
Question #: 72
Topic #: 7
[All 4A0-105 Questions]

Click on the exhibit below.

Assume there are two VPLS services configured on the MDU. How could load-balancing be achieved when using Active/Standby pseudowires?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Ernest at Jul 25, 2023, 07:19 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-105 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Rebbeca
2 months ago
Load-balancing 2 is a game changer for VPLS setups!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shayne
2 months ago
I think option B is misleading, it won't work as expected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
2 months ago
Each VPLS needs its own pair of spoke-SDPs!
upvoted 0 times
...
Anastacia
3 months ago
Wait, can load-balancing really be automatic like that?
upvoted 0 times
...
King
3 months ago
Totally agree, option C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lovetta
3 months ago
Ah, I see. Option B is the way to go - each VPLS will use the same pair of SDPs with the 'load-balancing 2' option. That should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystina
3 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the details here. I'll need to double-check my understanding of how VPLS and active/standby pseudowires work in order to determine the best approach for load-balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
4 months ago
This seems straightforward. Option C looks like the right answer - each VPLS needs its own pair of spoke-SDPs, and the active ones should be configured with 'precedence primary'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
4 months ago
Okay, let me see here. I think the key is understanding how to configure the spoke-SDPs for each VPLS service to achieve load-balancing. I'll need to review my notes on that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Asha
4 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about the concepts of VPLS and load-balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacqueline
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards option A being incorrect since I think load balancing is possible, but I’m not confident about the details of the configurations needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
4 months ago
I feel like option D might be too simplistic. I remember something about needing specific configurations for load balancing, but I can't pinpoint what they were.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
5 months ago
I think I came across a similar question in practice where we had to configure SDP's for load balancing. Option C sounds familiar, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
5 months ago
I remember studying about VPLS and how load balancing works, but I'm not entirely sure if option B is the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marnie
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. The Scrum Master and Product Owner both play important roles in value delivery, so I'm not sure which one is the "Value Optimizer" specifically. I'll have to review my Scrum knowledge before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Precious
5 months ago
Wait, I'm confused. Aren't there also permissions related to milestones and templates? I'll need to double-check the options to make sure I select the right combination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnda
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key things to focus on are how Cisco ACI handles Spanning Tree Protocol BPDUs and any special configuration required. I'll carefully read through the options and select the two that best describe the characteristics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
5 months ago
I think I know the answer, but I want to double-check my understanding before selecting it. This type of question is testing our knowledge of user permissions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
5 months ago
Easy peasy! Mandatory annual ethics training with an exam is clearly the way to go. That's the most comprehensive approach to ensure everyone actually understands the code of conduct. I'll mark that one down without hesitation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
9 months ago
Hmm, I think option B is the way to go. Why complicate things when you can just use the same pair of SDPs for both VPLS services?
upvoted 0 times
Willard
8 months ago
We should go with option B for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
8 months ago
Exactly, no need to overcomplicate things when there's a straightforward option available.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leigha
8 months ago
I agree, using the same pair of SDPs will make it easier to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
9 months ago
Option B is definitely the simplest solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Soledad
10 months ago
Ha! Load-balancing on Active/Standby pseudowires? That's like trying to balance a teeter-totter with one leg shorter than the other.
upvoted 0 times
Gladys
8 months ago
A) This cannot be done.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mickie
8 months ago
C) Each VPLS will need their own pair of spoke-SDP's configured. The spoke-sdp's that are to be active should be configured with the option 'precedence primary'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tabetha
8 months ago
B) Each VPLS will use the same pair of SDP's with the same endpoint configured with the option 'load-balancing 2'.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ryann
10 months ago
I'm not sure about this. Isn't option D the way to go? Just enable load-balancing 2 and let the MDU handle it.
upvoted 0 times
Tarra
9 months ago
Yes, that's right. Option C is the correct method for achieving load-balancing in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannan
9 months ago
I see, so option C is the correct way to achieve load-balancing with Active/Standby pseudowires.
upvoted 0 times
...
Taryn
9 months ago
Option D is not correct. Each VPLS will need their own pair of spoke-SDP's configured. The spoke-sdp's that are to be active should be configured with the option 'precedence primary.'
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mi
10 months ago
Option C seems to be the correct answer. Each VPLS needs its own pair of spoke-SDPs, and the active ones should be configured with the 'precedence primary' option.
upvoted 0 times
Latia
9 months ago
That's correct. This will help achieve load-balancing when using Active/Standby pseudowires.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
9 months ago
Yes, and the active ones should be configured with the 'precedence primary' option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
10 months ago
I think option C is the right choice. Each VPLS needs its own pair of spoke-SDPs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Willow
10 months ago
But wouldn't enabling load-balancing under the end-point configuration automatically achieve load-balancing?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamey
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willow
10 months ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
10 months ago
Hmm, I see your point. Let's review the exhibit again to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delila
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
11 months ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel