MENU
Click on the exhibit below.
Assume there are two VPLS services configured on the MDU. How could load-balancing be achieved when using Active/Standby pseudowires?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium 4A0-105 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
42 comments · newest first
RE
Rebbeca
10 months ago
Load-balancing 2 is a game changer for VPLS setups!
SH
Shayne
10 months ago
I think option B is misleading, it won't work as expected.
GA
Galen
10 months ago
Each VPLS needs its own pair of spoke-SDPs!
AN
Anastacia
11 months ago
Wait, can load-balancing really be automatic like that?
KI
King
11 months ago
Totally agree, option C is the way to go.
LO
Lovetta
11 months ago
Ah, I see. Option B is the way to go - each VPLS will use the same pair of SDPs with the 'load-balancing 2' option. That should do the trick.
KR
Krystina
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the details here. I'll need to double-check my understanding of how VPLS and active/standby pseudowires work in order to determine the best approach for load-balancing.
HE
Herminia
11 months ago
This seems straightforward. Option C looks like the right answer - each VPLS needs its own pair of spoke-SDPs, and the active ones should be configured with 'precedence primary'.
TH
Thaddeus
12 months ago
Okay, let me see here. I think the key is understanding how to configure the spoke-SDPs for each VPLS service to achieve load-balancing. I'll need to review my notes on that.
AS
Asha
12 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about the concepts of VPLS and load-balancing.
JA
Jacqueline
1 year ago
I’m leaning towards option A being incorrect since I think load balancing is possible, but I’m not confident about the details of the configurations needed.
EM
Emilio
1 year ago
I feel like option D might be too simplistic. I remember something about needing specific configurations for load balancing, but I can't pinpoint what they were.
AN
Angella
1 year ago
I think I came across a similar question in practice where we had to configure SDP's for load balancing. Option C sounds familiar, but I can't recall the specifics.
LE
Lettie
1 year ago
I remember studying about VPLS and how load balancing works, but I'm not entirely sure if option B is the right choice.
MA
Marnie
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. The Scrum Master and Product Owner both play important roles in value delivery, so I'm not sure which one is the "Value Optimizer" specifically. I'll have to review my Scrum knowledge before answering.
PR
Precious
1 year ago
Wait, I'm confused. Aren't there also permissions related to milestones and templates? I'll need to double-check the options to make sure I select the right combination.
SH
Shawnda
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key things to focus on are how Cisco ACI handles Spanning Tree Protocol BPDUs and any special configuration required. I'll carefully read through the options and select the two that best describe the characteristics.
NA
Nana
1 year ago
I think I know the answer, but I want to double-check my understanding before selecting it. This type of question is testing our knowledge of user permissions.
JA
Jacquelyne
1 year ago
Easy peasy! Mandatory annual ethics training with an exam is clearly the way to go. That's the most comprehensive approach to ensure everyone actually understands the code of conduct. I'll mark that one down without hesitation.
FR
Frederica
1 year ago
Hmm, I think option B is the way to go. Why complicate things when you can just use the same pair of SDPs for both VPLS services?
WI
Willard
1 year ago
We should go with option B for sure.
TH
Thaddeus
1 year ago
Exactly, no need to overcomplicate things when there's a straightforward option available.
LE
Leigha
1 year ago
I agree, using the same pair of SDPs will make it easier to manage.
SH
Sherell
1 year ago
Option B is definitely the simplest solution.
SO
Soledad
1 year ago
Ha! Load-balancing on Active/Standby pseudowires? That's like trying to balance a teeter-totter with one leg shorter than the other.
GL
Gladys
1 year ago
A) This cannot be done.
MI
Mickie
1 year ago
C) Each VPLS will need their own pair of spoke-SDP's configured. The spoke-sdp's that are to be active should be configured with the option 'precedence primary'.
TA
Tabetha
1 year ago
B) Each VPLS will use the same pair of SDP's with the same endpoint configured with the option 'load-balancing 2'.
RY
Ryann
1 year ago
I'm not sure about this. Isn't option D the way to go? Just enable load-balancing 2 and let the MDU handle it.
TA
Tarra
1 year ago
Yes, that's right. Option C is the correct method for achieving load-balancing in this scenario.
SH
Shannan
1 year ago
I see, so option C is the correct way to achieve load-balancing with Active/Standby pseudowires.
TA
Taryn
1 year ago
Option D is not correct. Each VPLS will need their own pair of spoke-SDP's configured. The spoke-sdp's that are to be active should be configured with the option 'precedence primary.'
MI
Mi
1 year ago
Option C seems to be the correct answer. Each VPLS needs its own pair of spoke-SDPs, and the active ones should be configured with the 'precedence primary' option.
LA
Latia
1 year ago
That's correct. This will help achieve load-balancing when using Active/Standby pseudowires.
IL
Iluminada
1 year ago
Yes, and the active ones should be configured with the 'precedence primary' option.
FE
Fernanda
1 year ago
I think option C is the right choice. Each VPLS needs its own pair of spoke-SDPs.
WI
Willow
2 years ago
But wouldn't enabling load-balancing under the end-point configuration automatically achieve load-balancing?
JA
Jamey
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C.
WI
Willow
2 years ago
I think the answer is B.
FR
France
2 years ago
Hmm, I see your point. Let's review the exhibit again to be sure.
DE
Delila
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C.
FR
France
2 years ago
I think the answer is B.