Haha, A? Really? As if the SAPs would just pretend the management VPLS doesn't exist. That's like saying, 'Oh, the manager is gone, so I don't have to do any work today!'
I'm going with D. Enabling spanning tree on the user VPLS SAPs sounds like a reasonable way to handle the situation when the management VPLS is disabled.
I'm not sure about C. It seems possible to administratively disable a management VPLS. But D could also work with enabling spanning tree on the user VPLS SAPs.
I think the correct answer is B. If the management VPLS is disabled, it makes sense that the associated user VPLS SAPs would also be disabled or pruned.
Isabelle
2 months agoLuther
2 months agoJohnna
2 days agoNobuko
4 days agoJaney
12 days agoLajuana
1 months agoSalome
1 months agoReiko
1 months agoRoyal
2 months agoJacqueline
2 months agoAlona
3 days agoArmando
17 days agoTwanna
27 days agoWynell
2 months agoLeonor
3 months agoGlory
3 months agoYuonne
3 months ago