Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nokia 4A0-105 Exam - Topic 6 Question 85 Discussion

If a management VPLS is administratively disabled what will be the status of the associated user VPLS SAPs?
D) Spanning tree will be automatically enabled on the user VPLS SAPs.
A) Regular semantics will apply. It will be as if the SAP doesn't belong to a management VPLS.
B) All user VPLS SAPs will be disabled/pruned.
C) It is not possible to administratively disable a management VPLS.

Nokia 4A0-105 Exam - Topic 6 Question 85 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-105 exam
Question #: 85
Topic #: 6
[All 4A0-105 Questions]

If a management VPLS is administratively disabled what will be the status of the associated user VPLS SAPs?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Hyun at Apr 22, 2024, 02:41 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-105 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Lennie
6 months ago
C is a myth, you can disable a management VPLS if needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
6 months ago
B is definitely wrong, they won't all be disabled.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claudio
7 months ago
Wait, is it really possible to disable a management VPLS? Sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
7 months ago
Totally agree, A makes the most sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynette
7 months ago
A is correct, the SAPs act like they're not part of the management VPLS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
7 months ago
I don’t recall spanning tree being automatically enabled on user VPLS SAPs, so I think option D is probably incorrect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynna
8 months ago
I’m leaning towards option C because I thought we can't actually disable a management VPLS, but I need to double-check that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
8 months ago
I remember a practice question that mentioned regular semantics applying when a management VPLS is disabled. Could that be option A?
upvoted 0 times
...
Makeda
8 months ago
I think if the management VPLS is disabled, the user VPLS SAPs might get disabled too, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
8 months ago
I don't think it's possible to disable a management VPLS. That's the core of the VPLS configuration, so it should always be active. The user VPLS SAPs would continue to function normally regardless of the management VPLS state. I'm pretty sure that's the correct approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katlyn
8 months ago
Okay, I've got this. If the management VPLS is disabled, the user VPLS SAPs should still function normally, as if the management VPLS doesn't exist. The regular semantics should apply. I'm confident that's the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
8 months ago
Hmm, I think the key here is understanding how the management VPLS and user VPLS are related. If the management VPLS is disabled, that might cause the user VPLS SAPs to be disabled as well. I'll need to review my notes on VPLS configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
8 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not sure if the management VPLS being disabled would affect the user VPLS SAPs or not. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
8 months ago
Wait, I'm confused. If the management VPLS is disabled, wouldn't that mean the user VPLS SAPs would also be disabled or pruned? I'm not sure, but I think that might be the case. I'll have to double-check my understanding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clement
8 months ago
Okay, I think the key here is to explore, draw out, and identify the information relevant to the change. That's going to be crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
8 months ago
I'm a little unsure about this one. The options seem similar, and I want to make sure I understand the differences between BIA, RTO, MTTR, and SLA. Let me re-read the question and think it through step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashonda
8 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'll need to make sure I don't miss any of the loss relief rules and apply them correctly to the given figures. Time to put on my thinking cap!
upvoted 0 times
...
Isabelle
1 year ago
Haha, A? Really? As if the SAPs would just pretend the management VPLS doesn't exist. That's like saying, 'Oh, the manager is gone, so I don't have to do any work today!'
upvoted 0 times
...
Luther
1 year ago
I'm going with D. Enabling spanning tree on the user VPLS SAPs sounds like a reasonable way to handle the situation when the management VPLS is disabled.
upvoted 0 times
Johnna
12 months ago
I'm also leaning towards B. It seems like the most logical outcome.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
12 months ago
I agree with B. All user VPLS SAPs will be disabled/pruned.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
12 months ago
I think A makes more sense. It will be as if the SAP doesn't belong to a management VPLS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lajuana
1 year ago
I'm not sure about C. It seems possible to administratively disable a management VPLS. But D could also work with enabling spanning tree on the user VPLS SAPs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
1 year ago
I agree with B. All user VPLS SAPs will be disabled/pruned if the management VPLS is administratively disabled.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reiko
1 year ago
I think A makes more sense. It will be like the SAP doesn't belong to a management VPLS.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Royal
1 year ago
Come on, how can C be the answer? Of course, you can administratively disable a management VPLS, that's just common sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacqueline
1 year ago
I think the correct answer is B. If the management VPLS is disabled, it makes sense that the associated user VPLS SAPs would also be disabled or pruned.
upvoted 0 times
Alona
12 months ago
I see your point, it's important to consider all options before determining the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Armando
1 year ago
That could be a possibility, but I still think it's more likely that all user VPLS SAPs would be disabled or pruned.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twanna
1 year ago
But what if regular semantics apply and it's as if the SAP doesn't belong to a management VPLS?
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
1 year ago
I agree, it would make sense for all user VPLS SAPs to be disabled if the management VPLS is administratively disabled.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leonor
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think the answer might be D. Spanning tree will be automatically enabled on the user VPLS SAPs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is A. Regular semantics will apply.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuonne
1 year ago
I think the answer is B. All user VPLS SAPs will be disabled/pruned.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel