MENU
What are the advantages of running a physical ring topology with a mesh of mesh-SDPs? (Choose 2)
Suggested Answer: A, C
Get Premium 4A0-105 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
41 comments · newest first
AD
Adell
11 months ago
Unicast traffic might not benefit as much from a full mesh, though.
CA
Caitlin
11 months ago
I thought split-horizon rules were more complex than that.
HE
Herschel
11 months ago
Wait, isn't STP still needed sometimes?
SH
Sherita
12 months ago
Totally agree, multicast efficiency is key.
TH
Thersa
12 months ago
A full mesh is great for multicast traffic!
CR
Cristal
12 months ago
I'm leaning towards option C because it makes sense that multicast traffic would benefit from a full mesh, but I'm not entirely confident.
ST
Stefan
1 year ago
I feel like split-horizon rules came up in our studies, but I can't recall exactly how they apply to this question.
GE
Gerardo
1 year ago
I think we practiced a similar question where multicast traffic was mentioned as a benefit for mesh designs. That might be relevant here.
IL
Iluminada
1 year ago
I remember discussing how STP can help with loops in ring topologies, but I'm not sure if it's the best choice here.
ER
Erinn
1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure about the multicast and unicast parts. Do those relate to the advantages of running a physical ring topology with a mesh of mesh-SDPs? I want to make sure I'm not missing something there.
MA
Marnie
1 year ago
Yeah, the split-horizon rules are key here. I think option B is a good choice since it directly addresses that. And if the traffic is mostly multicast or unicast, then a full mesh of SDPs could be a simple and efficient design.
ED
Eden
1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through. I know that STP is used to break loops in a physical ring topology, but if we're using mesh-SDPs, that might not be necessary. The split-horizon rules could handle that.
KI
Kiley
1 year ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the key concepts around ring topologies and mesh-SDPs before answering.
VE
Velda
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. Political risks, interest rate risks, and economic risks are all forms of risk, so the answer must be C. Presented risks doesn't sound like a real type of risk.
VE
Veronika
1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through. I know the Nodal license controls a single node, and the Corporate license is for a network. Now I just need to figure out the other details.
BE
Bette
1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure, but I think the communication about the customer going into liquidation could be a non-adjusting event since it happened after the reporting date.
AR
Armando
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know ECDSA uses elliptic curves, but I'm not sure if that's the same as the key exchange algorithm.
OT
Otis
1 year ago
Hey, at least they didn't ask about the advantages of running a human centipede topology. Now that would be a real head-scratcher.
KE
Kenda
1 year ago
I agree, running a human centipede topology would definitely be a nightmare!
ME
Melissia
1 year ago
C) If the traffic is primarily multicast, a full mesh of SDPs is a simple and efficient design.
SH
Sherita
1 year ago
A) STP can be used to break the loop.
RA
Rana
1 year ago
Easy peasy! B and C are the way to go. Who needs STP when you've got split-horizon rules and multicast traffic? This question is a piece of cake!
GE
Gerardo
1 year ago
C) If the traffic is primarily multicast, a full mesh of SDPs is a simple and efficient design.
MA
Mammie
1 year ago
B) STP is not required to break the loop because of split-horizon rules.
JO
Jospeh
1 year ago
I don't know, this question seems a bit tricky. I'm going to guess A and D just to be safe. Maybe I should have paid more attention in class.
LA
Larae
1 year ago
Willard: No problem, glad we could figure it out together.
OD
Odette
1 year ago
User 3: That makes sense, thanks for clarifying.
WI
Willard
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, STP can break the loop and a full mesh of SDPs is efficient for Unicast traffic.
VA
Vanesa
1 year ago
User 1: I think the answer is A and D.
GA
Galen
2 years ago
I'm going to go with B and D. If it's mostly unicast traffic, a full mesh of SDPs is a simple and efficient design.
AN
Anastacia
2 years ago
Hmm, I think B and C are the correct answers. STP is not needed for a ring topology with a mesh of SDPs, and a full mesh is efficient for multicast traffic.
SE
Selma
1 year ago
That's right, STP is not needed for that setup and a full mesh is efficient for multicast traffic.
DE
Deeanna
1 year ago
I agree, B and C are the correct answers.
DO
Dorthy
1 year ago
That's right, STP is not needed for that setup and a full mesh is efficient for multicast traffic.
CO
Colby
1 year ago
I agree, B and C are the correct answers.
TE
Tegan
2 years ago
I believe another advantage is that if the traffic is primarily multicast, a full mesh of SDPs is a simple and efficient design.
BR
Brynn
2 years ago
I agree with Jules, using STP to break the loop is definitely an advantage.
JU
Jules
2 years ago
I think the advantage of running a physical ring topology with a mesh of mesh-SDPs is that STP can be used to break the loop.
SC
Scarlet
2 years ago
I believe STP is not required to break the loop because of split-horizon rules, so that's another advantage.
RA
Ranee
2 years ago
I agree with Garry. Having a full mesh of SDPs can help with both multicast and unicast traffic.
GA
Garry
2 years ago
I think the advantages of running a physical ring topology with a mesh of mesh-SDPs are efficiency and simplicity.