Nokia 4A0-105 Exam - Topic 5 Question 105 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-105 exam

Question #: 105
Topic #: 5

[All 4A0-105 Questions]

Click on the exhibit below.

Given the following output what is the most likely reason the SDP binding is operationally down? (Choose 2)

AThe sdp id is different on the far-end.

BLDP is disabled on the far-end.

CThe vc-id is different on the far-end.

DThe mesh-sdp is missing on the far-end.

EThe mesh-sdp is administratively shutdown on PEL

FThere is an MTU mismatch.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A, C

by Phillip at Jan 09, 2025, 04:57 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-105 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Carri

3 months ago

MTU mismatch? Didn't see that coming!

upvoted 0 times

...

Refugia

3 months ago

I think D is more likely than E.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joaquin

3 months ago

Wait, C could be the reason too, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Vincent

4 months ago

Totally agree, B is also a big one!

upvoted 0 times

...

Leatha

4 months ago

A - sdp id mismatch is a common issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kathrine

4 months ago

I feel like I read about MTU mismatches causing issues too, but I can't recall if that was specifically for SDP. Option F seems like a long shot.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tamra

4 months ago

I practiced a question similar to this, and I think the vc-id being different could also be a reason. So, option C might be worth considering.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hyun

4 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I think if LDP is disabled on the far-end, it could definitely cause the binding to be down. That makes me lean towards option B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dick

5 months ago

I remember something about the SDP ID needing to match on both ends, so maybe option A is a possibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Virgie

5 months ago

This seems straightforward enough. I'll carefully go through each option and eliminate the ones that don't seem relevant based on the information provided.

upvoted 0 times

...

Harrison

5 months ago

Based on the output, I think the most likely reasons are either a mismatch in the SDP ID or the mesh-SDP being administratively shut down on the PEL. I'll double-check those first.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kallie

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused by the options here. I'll need to review the relevant networking concepts to make sure I understand what each of these could mean.

upvoted 0 times

...

Evangelina

5 months ago

Okay, let's see here. The key things to look for are mismatches in the SDP ID, VC-ID, and LDP configuration on the far-end.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lucia

5 months ago

Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully analyze the output to identify the most likely reasons for the SDP binding being down.

upvoted 0 times

...

Justine

9 months ago

LDP being disabled on the far-end? That's just asking for trouble. Rookie mistake right there.

upvoted 0 times

Markus

8 months ago

User 3: It's important to ensure all necessary protocols are enabled for proper connectivity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Georgiana

8 months ago

User 2: Definitely, that's a common reason for SDP binding to be operationally down.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alaine

9 months ago

User 1: Yeah, disabling LDP on the far-end is a big no-no.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malcolm

10 months ago

I'm betting it's a combination of the sdp id and vc-id being different. Gotta love those tricky networking questions!

upvoted 0 times

Curtis

8 months ago

E) The mesh-sdp is administratively shutdown on PEL

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashanda

9 months ago

C) The vc-id is different on the far-end.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kimberely

9 months ago

A) The sdp id is different on the far-end.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dominga

10 months ago

Haha, imagine if the problem was just an MTU mismatch. That would be the most anticlimactic answer ever.

upvoted 0 times

Lewis

9 months ago

User 3: I hope it's not something that easy, that would be embarrassing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Timothy

10 months ago

User 2: I know, it would be such a simple fix.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yoko

10 months ago

User 1: Yeah, that would be pretty funny.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nickole

10 months ago

D and E seem like the most likely culprits here. If the mesh-sdp is missing or administratively shutdown, that would definitely cause the issue.

upvoted 0 times

Antonio

9 months ago

Yes, if the mesh-sdp is missing or administratively shutdown, it would definitely cause the issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tashia

10 months ago

I agree, D and E are the most likely reasons for the SDP binding to be operationally down.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorothy

11 months ago

I believe the correct answers are A) The sdp id is different on the far-end and E) The mesh-sdp is administratively shutdown on PEL, based on the output provided.

upvoted 0 times

...