Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nokia 4A0-105 Exam - Topic 5 Question 105 Discussion

Posted by Phillip on Jan 09, 2025 at 04:57 PM

Click on the exhibit below.

Given the following output what is the most likely reason the SDP binding is operationally down? (Choose 2)

Suggested Answer: A, C

Get Premium 4A0-105 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
37 comments · newest first
CA
Carri 11 months ago
MTU mismatch? Didn't see that coming!
RE
Refugia 11 months ago
I think D is more likely than E.
JO
Joaquin 11 months ago
Wait, C could be the reason too, right?
VI
Vincent 11 months ago
Totally agree, B is also a big one!
LE
Leatha 12 months ago
A - sdp id mismatch is a common issue.
KA
Kathrine 12 months ago
I feel like I read about MTU mismatches causing issues too, but I can't recall if that was specifically for SDP. Option F seems like a long shot.
TA
Tamra 1 year ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think the vc-id being different could also be a reason. So, option C might be worth considering.
HY
Hyun 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think if LDP is disabled on the far-end, it could definitely cause the binding to be down. That makes me lean towards option B.
DI
Dick 1 year ago
I remember something about the SDP ID needing to match on both ends, so maybe option A is a possibility.
VI
Virgie 1 year ago
This seems straightforward enough. I'll carefully go through each option and eliminate the ones that don't seem relevant based on the information provided.
HA
Harrison 1 year ago
Based on the output, I think the most likely reasons are either a mismatch in the SDP ID or the mesh-SDP being administratively shut down on the PEL. I'll double-check those first.
KA
Kallie 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the options here. I'll need to review the relevant networking concepts to make sure I understand what each of these could mean.
EV
Evangelina 1 year ago
Okay, let's see here. The key things to look for are mismatches in the SDP ID, VC-ID, and LDP configuration on the far-end.
LU
Lucia 1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully analyze the output to identify the most likely reasons for the SDP binding being down.
JU
Justine 1 year ago
LDP being disabled on the far-end? That's just asking for trouble. Rookie mistake right there.
MA
Markus 1 year ago
↳ replying to Justine
User 3: It's important to ensure all necessary protocols are enabled for proper connectivity.
GE
Georgiana 1 year ago
↳ replying to Justine
User 2: Definitely, that's a common reason for SDP binding to be operationally down.
AL
Alaine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Justine
User 1: Yeah, disabling LDP on the far-end is a big no-no.
MA
Malcolm 1 year ago
I'm betting it's a combination of the sdp id and vc-id being different. Gotta love those tricky networking questions!
CU
Curtis 1 year ago
↳ replying to Malcolm
E) The mesh-sdp is administratively shutdown on PEL
LA
Lashanda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Malcolm
C) The vc-id is different on the far-end.
KI
Kimberely 1 year ago
↳ replying to Malcolm
A) The sdp id is different on the far-end.
DO
Dominga 1 year ago
Haha, imagine if the problem was just an MTU mismatch. That would be the most anticlimactic answer ever.
LE
Lewis 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dominga
User 3: I hope it's not something that easy, that would be embarrassing.
TI
Timothy 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dominga
User 2: I know, it would be such a simple fix.
YO
Yoko 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dominga
User 1: Yeah, that would be pretty funny.
NI
Nickole 2 years ago
D and E seem like the most likely culprits here. If the mesh-sdp is missing or administratively shutdown, that would definitely cause the issue.
AN
Antonio 1 year ago
↳ replying to Nickole
Yes, if the mesh-sdp is missing or administratively shutdown, it would definitely cause the issue.
TA
Tashia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Nickole
I agree, D and E are the most likely reasons for the SDP binding to be operationally down.
DO
Dorothy 2 years ago
I believe the correct answers are A) The sdp id is different on the far-end and E) The mesh-sdp is administratively shutdown on PEL, based on the output provided.
KR
Kris 2 years ago
I agree with Michael, but I also think D) The mesh-sdp is missing on the far-end could be a reason.
SH
Sharmaine 2 years ago
The SDP binding is likely operationally down due to a mismatch in the sdp id or vc-id on the far-end. I'd check those first.
FR
Freeman 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sharmaine
Good point, that could definitely cause the SDP binding to be down.
CH
Chanel 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sharmaine
Maybe the vc-id is also different on the far-end.
RU
Rusty 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sharmaine
Yeah, that could be the reason. It's a common issue.
TE
Teddy 2 years ago
↳ replying to Sharmaine
I think the sdp id might be different on the far-end.
MI
Michael 2 years ago
I think the most likely reason is A) The sdp id is different on the far-end.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel