Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nokia 4A0-105 Exam - Topic 5 Question 105 Discussion

Click on the exhibit below.Given the following output what is the most likely reason the SDP binding is operationally down? (Choose 2)
A) The sdp id is different on the far-end. and C) The vc-id is different on the far-end.
B) LDP is disabled on the far-end.
D) The mesh-sdp is missing on the far-end.
E) The mesh-sdp is administratively shutdown on PEL
F) There is an MTU mismatch.

Nokia 4A0-105 Exam - Topic 5 Question 105 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-105 exam
Question #: 105
Topic #: 5
[All 4A0-105 Questions]

Click on the exhibit below.

Given the following output what is the most likely reason the SDP binding is operationally down? (Choose 2)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

by Phillip at Jan 09, 2025, 04:57 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-105 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Carri
9 months ago
MTU mismatch? Didn't see that coming!
upvoted 0 times
...
Refugia
9 months ago
I think D is more likely than E.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joaquin
10 months ago
Wait, C could be the reason too, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincent
10 months ago
Totally agree, B is also a big one!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
10 months ago
A - sdp id mismatch is a common issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathrine
10 months ago
I feel like I read about MTU mismatches causing issues too, but I can't recall if that was specifically for SDP. Option F seems like a long shot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
11 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think the vc-id being different could also be a reason. So, option C might be worth considering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think if LDP is disabled on the far-end, it could definitely cause the binding to be down. That makes me lean towards option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
11 months ago
I remember something about the SDP ID needing to match on both ends, so maybe option A is a possibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
11 months ago
This seems straightforward enough. I'll carefully go through each option and eliminate the ones that don't seem relevant based on the information provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harrison
11 months ago
Based on the output, I think the most likely reasons are either a mismatch in the SDP ID or the mesh-SDP being administratively shut down on the PEL. I'll double-check those first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the options here. I'll need to review the relevant networking concepts to make sure I understand what each of these could mean.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
11 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The key things to look for are mismatches in the SDP ID, VC-ID, and LDP configuration on the far-end.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucia
11 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully analyze the output to identify the most likely reasons for the SDP binding being down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
1 year ago
LDP being disabled on the far-end? That's just asking for trouble. Rookie mistake right there.
upvoted 0 times
Markus
1 year ago
User 3: It's important to ensure all necessary protocols are enabled for proper connectivity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgiana
1 year ago
User 2: Definitely, that's a common reason for SDP binding to be operationally down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
1 year ago
User 1: Yeah, disabling LDP on the far-end is a big no-no.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Malcolm
1 year ago
I'm betting it's a combination of the sdp id and vc-id being different. Gotta love those tricky networking questions!
upvoted 0 times
Curtis
1 year ago
E) The mesh-sdp is administratively shutdown on PEL
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashanda
1 year ago
C) The vc-id is different on the far-end.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberely
1 year ago
A) The sdp id is different on the far-end.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dominga
1 year ago
Haha, imagine if the problem was just an MTU mismatch. That would be the most anticlimactic answer ever.
upvoted 0 times
Lewis
1 year ago
User 3: I hope it's not something that easy, that would be embarrassing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
1 year ago
User 2: I know, it would be such a simple fix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
1 year ago
User 1: Yeah, that would be pretty funny.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nickole
1 year ago
D and E seem like the most likely culprits here. If the mesh-sdp is missing or administratively shutdown, that would definitely cause the issue.
upvoted 0 times
Antonio
1 year ago
Yes, if the mesh-sdp is missing or administratively shutdown, it would definitely cause the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tashia
1 year ago
I agree, D and E are the most likely reasons for the SDP binding to be operationally down.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dorothy
1 year ago
I believe the correct answers are A) The sdp id is different on the far-end and E) The mesh-sdp is administratively shutdown on PEL, based on the output provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
1 year ago
I agree with Michael, but I also think D) The mesh-sdp is missing on the far-end could be a reason.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharmaine
1 year ago
The SDP binding is likely operationally down due to a mismatch in the sdp id or vc-id on the far-end. I'd check those first.
upvoted 0 times
Freeman
1 year ago
Good point, that could definitely cause the SDP binding to be down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
1 year ago
Maybe the vc-id is also different on the far-end.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rusty
1 year ago
Yeah, that could be the reason. It's a common issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
1 year ago
I think the sdp id might be different on the far-end.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Michael
1 year ago
I think the most likely reason is A) The sdp id is different on the far-end.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel