Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nokia 4A0-105 Exam - Topic 5 Question 105 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-105 exam
Question #: 105
Topic #: 5
[All 4A0-105 Questions]

Click on the exhibit below.

Given the following output what is the most likely reason the SDP binding is operationally down? (Choose 2)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

by Phillip at Jan 09, 2025, 04:57 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-105 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Carri
5 months ago
MTU mismatch? Didn't see that coming!
upvoted 0 times
...
Refugia
5 months ago
I think D is more likely than E.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joaquin
5 months ago
Wait, C could be the reason too, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincent
5 months ago
Totally agree, B is also a big one!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
6 months ago
A - sdp id mismatch is a common issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathrine
6 months ago
I feel like I read about MTU mismatches causing issues too, but I can't recall if that was specifically for SDP. Option F seems like a long shot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
6 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think the vc-id being different could also be a reason. So, option C might be worth considering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
6 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think if LDP is disabled on the far-end, it could definitely cause the binding to be down. That makes me lean towards option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
6 months ago
I remember something about the SDP ID needing to match on both ends, so maybe option A is a possibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
6 months ago
This seems straightforward enough. I'll carefully go through each option and eliminate the ones that don't seem relevant based on the information provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harrison
6 months ago
Based on the output, I think the most likely reasons are either a mismatch in the SDP ID or the mesh-SDP being administratively shut down on the PEL. I'll double-check those first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the options here. I'll need to review the relevant networking concepts to make sure I understand what each of these could mean.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
6 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The key things to look for are mismatches in the SDP ID, VC-ID, and LDP configuration on the far-end.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucia
7 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully analyze the output to identify the most likely reasons for the SDP binding being down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
11 months ago
LDP being disabled on the far-end? That's just asking for trouble. Rookie mistake right there.
upvoted 0 times
Markus
10 months ago
User 3: It's important to ensure all necessary protocols are enabled for proper connectivity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgiana
10 months ago
User 2: Definitely, that's a common reason for SDP binding to be operationally down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
10 months ago
User 1: Yeah, disabling LDP on the far-end is a big no-no.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Malcolm
11 months ago
I'm betting it's a combination of the sdp id and vc-id being different. Gotta love those tricky networking questions!
upvoted 0 times
Curtis
10 months ago
E) The mesh-sdp is administratively shutdown on PEL
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashanda
11 months ago
C) The vc-id is different on the far-end.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberely
11 months ago
A) The sdp id is different on the far-end.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dominga
12 months ago
Haha, imagine if the problem was just an MTU mismatch. That would be the most anticlimactic answer ever.
upvoted 0 times
Lewis
11 months ago
User 3: I hope it's not something that easy, that would be embarrassing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
11 months ago
User 2: I know, it would be such a simple fix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
12 months ago
User 1: Yeah, that would be pretty funny.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nickole
1 year ago
D and E seem like the most likely culprits here. If the mesh-sdp is missing or administratively shutdown, that would definitely cause the issue.
upvoted 0 times
Antonio
11 months ago
Yes, if the mesh-sdp is missing or administratively shutdown, it would definitely cause the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tashia
12 months ago
I agree, D and E are the most likely reasons for the SDP binding to be operationally down.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dorothy
1 year ago
I believe the correct answers are A) The sdp id is different on the far-end and E) The mesh-sdp is administratively shutdown on PEL, based on the output provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
1 year ago
I agree with Michael, but I also think D) The mesh-sdp is missing on the far-end could be a reason.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharmaine
1 year ago
The SDP binding is likely operationally down due to a mismatch in the sdp id or vc-id on the far-end. I'd check those first.
upvoted 0 times
Freeman
11 months ago
Good point, that could definitely cause the SDP binding to be down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
11 months ago
Maybe the vc-id is also different on the far-end.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rusty
11 months ago
Yeah, that could be the reason. It's a common issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
12 months ago
I think the sdp id might be different on the far-end.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Michael
1 year ago
I think the most likely reason is A) The sdp id is different on the far-end.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel