MENU
Click on the exhibit below.
Management VPLS 100 has been created for redundant spoke-SDP connections. User VPLSs 10 and 20 are using the same spoke-SDPs that are being managed by VPLS 100. Unexpected behavior has been reported. Based on the following output, what is the most likely reason for the unexpected behavior?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium 4A0-105 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
32 comments · newest first
AL
Aleta
11 months ago
I disagree, I think it could be option C instead.
AR
Aretha
11 months ago
Seems odd that there's unexpected behavior.
SI
Sina
11 months ago
Wait, are we sure VPLS 10 and 20 are set up right?
RA
Rasheeda
11 months ago
I think it's definitely option A.
RO
Roosevelt
12 months ago
VPLS 100 is supposed to manage those connections.
LA
Laurel
12 months ago
I feel like option D might be a trap. The output should give us some clues, but I can’t recall the specifics.
OL
Olen
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused about the spoke-SDP connections. Could it be that VPLS 10 and 20 are using different spoke-SDPs than VPLS 100?
HA
Hassie
1 year ago
This question feels similar to one we practiced where user VPLSs were misconfigured. I think option A could be the issue here.
CO
Coleen
1 year ago
I remember studying management VPLS configurations, but I'm not entirely sure if VPLS 100 was set up correctly.
MA
Malcolm
1 year ago
I think I've got a handle on this. Based on the information provided, the most likely reason is that VPLS 10 and VPLS 20 are not actually using the same spoke-SDPs that the management VPLS is using. I'll double-check the other options, but that's my initial assessment.
AL
Alverta
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. The output doesn't seem to provide much information to go on. I'll need to think through the possible scenarios and see if I can eliminate any of the answer choices.
YA
Yan
1 year ago
Okay, let's see here. The question mentions a management VPLS 100 and user VPLSs 10 and 20 using the same spoke-SDPs. I'll need to analyze the configuration details to determine if the issue is with the management VPLS or the user VPLSs.
KA
Kaycee
1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the output and the options to figure out the most likely reason for the unexpected behavior.
NE
Nenita
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The code doesn't give me a clear indication of what the API response will contain. I'll need to think it through step-by-step.
HA
Haley
1 year ago
The Program Enrollment dashboard seems like it could be relevant, as it might show enrollment numbers. But I'm not sure if that's exactly what the question is asking for.
LE
Leonor
2 years ago
Haha, this question is a classic case of 'not enough information'. I bet the test writers are trying to trip us up with that option D!
SH
Shonda
1 year ago
Yeah, this question is definitely testing our attention to detail.
RE
Reita
1 year ago
It could also be that VPLS 10 and VPLS 20 are not using the same spoke-sdps.
TA
Tayna
1 year ago
Maybe VPLS 100 was not configured correctly as a management VPLS.
DE
Delbert
1 year ago
I think option D is a trap, there must be a way to figure out the issue.
FE
Felicidad
2 years ago
D? Really? How can there be 'no way of telling' if there's a problem with the configuration? The output must provide some clues.
MA
Marcelle
2 years ago
Aha! I think the answer is C. If the user VPLSs are not using the same spoke-SDPs as the management VPLS, that would explain the unexpected behavior.
TR
Tracey
1 year ago
Yes, if VPLS 10 and VPLS 20 are not using the same spoke-SDPs as the management VPLS, that could definitely cause issues.
MA
Margot
1 year ago
I agree, option C seems to be the most likely reason for the unexpected behavior.
LA
Lashonda
2 years ago
Hmm, that's an interesting point. I can see why you think that.
SA
Salome
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. The output doesn't seem to provide enough information to determine the issue. I'll have to read the question and options carefully.
RO
Roy
1 year ago
Juliann: True, we need to consider all possibilities before making a conclusion.
SH
Shawna
1 year ago
User 3: It could also be that VPLS 10 and VPLS 20 are not using the same spoke-sdps.
JU
Juliann
1 year ago
User 2: Maybe the management VPLS was not configured correctly?
DI
Diane
1 year ago
User 1: I think we need to carefully analyze the output to determine the issue.
MI
Michell
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe option C is the correct answer.
LA
Lashonda
2 years ago
I think the most likely reason is option A.