Nokia 4A0-105 Exam - Topic 3 Question 82 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-105 exam

Question #: 82
Topic #: 3

Click on the exhibit below.

Management VPLS 100 has been created for redundant spoke-SDP connections. User VPLSs 10 and 20 are using the same spoke-SDPs that are being managed by VPLS 100. Unexpected behavior has been reported. Based on the following output, what is the most likely reason for the unexpected behavior?

AVPLS 100 was not actually configured as a management VPLS.

BVPLS 10 and VPLS 20 are not actually configured as a user VPLS.

CVPLS 10 and VPLS 20 are not using the same spoke-sdps that the management VPLS is using.

DBased on the output there is now way of telling if there is a problem with the configuration.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Glenna at Mar 09, 2024, 07:55 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-105 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Aleta

3 months ago

I disagree, I think it could be option C instead.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aretha

3 months ago

Seems odd that there's unexpected behavior.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sina

3 months ago

Wait, are we sure VPLS 10 and 20 are set up right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Rasheeda

4 months ago

I think it's definitely option A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Roosevelt

4 months ago

VPLS 100 is supposed to manage those connections.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laurel

4 months ago

I feel like option D might be a trap. The output should give us some clues, but I can’t recall the specifics.

upvoted 0 times

...

Olen

4 months ago

I'm a bit confused about the spoke-SDP connections. Could it be that VPLS 10 and 20 are using different spoke-SDPs than VPLS 100?

upvoted 0 times

...

Hassie

4 months ago

This question feels similar to one we practiced where user VPLSs were misconfigured. I think option A could be the issue here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Coleen

5 months ago

I remember studying management VPLS configurations, but I'm not entirely sure if VPLS 100 was set up correctly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malcolm

5 months ago

I think I've got a handle on this. Based on the information provided, the most likely reason is that VPLS 10 and VPLS 20 are not actually using the same spoke-SDPs that the management VPLS is using. I'll double-check the other options, but that's my initial assessment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alverta

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused by this question. The output doesn't seem to provide much information to go on. I'll need to think through the possible scenarios and see if I can eliminate any of the answer choices.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yan

5 months ago

Okay, let's see here. The question mentions a management VPLS 100 and user VPLSs 10 and 20 using the same spoke-SDPs. I'll need to analyze the configuration details to determine if the issue is with the management VPLS or the user VPLSs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kaycee

5 months ago

Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the output and the options to figure out the most likely reason for the unexpected behavior.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nenita

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The code doesn't give me a clear indication of what the API response will contain. I'll need to think it through step-by-step.

upvoted 0 times

...

Haley

5 months ago

The Program Enrollment dashboard seems like it could be relevant, as it might show enrollment numbers. But I'm not sure if that's exactly what the question is asking for.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leonor

10 months ago

Haha, this question is a classic case of 'not enough information'. I bet the test writers are trying to trip us up with that option D!

upvoted 0 times

Shonda

9 months ago

Yeah, this question is definitely testing our attention to detail.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reita

9 months ago

It could also be that VPLS 10 and VPLS 20 are not using the same spoke-sdps.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tayna

10 months ago

Maybe VPLS 100 was not configured correctly as a management VPLS.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delbert

10 months ago

I think option D is a trap, there must be a way to figure out the issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felicidad

10 months ago

D? Really? How can there be 'no way of telling' if there's a problem with the configuration? The output must provide some clues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marcelle

10 months ago

Aha! I think the answer is C. If the user VPLSs are not using the same spoke-SDPs as the management VPLS, that would explain the unexpected behavior.

upvoted 0 times

Tracey

10 months ago

Yes, if VPLS 10 and VPLS 20 are not using the same spoke-SDPs as the management VPLS, that could definitely cause issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margot

10 months ago

I agree, option C seems to be the most likely reason for the unexpected behavior.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashonda

10 months ago

Hmm, that's an interesting point. I can see why you think that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Salome

11 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. The output doesn't seem to provide enough information to determine the issue. I'll have to read the question and options carefully.

upvoted 0 times