MENU
Click on the exhibit below.
Management VPLS 100 has been created for redundant spoke-SDP connections. User VPLSs 10 and 20 are using the same spoke-SDPs that are being managed by VPLS 100. Unexpected behavior has been reported. Based on the following output, what is the most likely reason for the unexpected behavior?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium 4A0-105 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
10 comments · newest first
FR
Francoise
12 months ago
Not sure about this, but option D seems a bit off.
LE
Leslee
12 months ago
I think VPLS 10 and 20 are fine, so not option B.
NE
Nell
12 months ago
Wait, could it really be that simple?
CY
Cyril
1 year ago
I agree, option A makes the most sense here.
LO
Louvenia
1 year ago
Seems like VPLS 100 might not be set up right.
KI
Kindra
1 year ago
I have a vague recollection that if the user VPLSs aren't configured properly, it could lead to unexpected behavior. Maybe it's B?
GR
Gracia
1 year ago
This question feels similar to one we practiced where we had to identify issues with user VPLSs. I think the answer might be A, but I could be wrong.
GE
Gerry
1 year ago
I remember studying about management VPLS configurations, but I'm not entirely sure if VPLS 100 was set up correctly.
GE
Geraldine
1 year ago
I’m not confident about this, but I think D could be a possibility since the output doesn’t give us clear indicators of the problem.
PA
Pamella
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this. I'll have to review the material on ingestion types.