MENU
Which of the following statements best describes an FDB used in a VPLS service?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium 4A0-104 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
34 comments · newest first
MO
Mose
11 months ago
A is definitely wrong, VPLS needs an FDB to function properly.
BR
Brice
11 months ago
D seems right, separate FDBs for each service is logical.
AL
Alva
11 months ago
Wait, are there really two FDBs for each service? That sounds complicated!
HE
Herman
11 months ago
C makes more sense, it should track all VPLS services.
BR
Brigette
12 months ago
I think B is correct, FDBs track MACs on the PE router.
CL
Claudio
12 months ago
I vaguely remember that there could be multiple FDBs, but I’m not sure if it's two for each service or just one. I need to think about the multicast and broadcast traffic part.
RI
Rima
1 year ago
I’m a bit confused about whether there’s one FDB for all services or separate ones. I thought each VPLS might have its own FDB, but I can't recall clearly.
DE
Devora
1 year ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I feel like option C sounds right since it mentions tracking MAC addresses for all VPLS services on the router.
TI
Timmy
1 year ago
I think I remember that an FDB is related to how MAC addresses are learned, but I'm not sure if it's for all traffic or just specific services.
AN
Antonio
1 year ago
Ah, this is a tricky one. I'm torn between B and D. I know the FDB is used to track MAC addresses, but I'm not sure if it's for all traffic or just the VPLS services. I'll have to think this through carefully.
BR
Britt
1 year ago
I'm pretty confident that the correct answer is C. The FDB on the PE router tracks MAC addresses learned from all VPLS services configured on that router, not just a single service.
HO
Hobert
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know VPLS is a Layer 2 VPN service, but I'm not totally clear on the specifics of how the FDB works in that context. I'll have to review my notes to see if I can figure this out.
TA
Tasia
1 year ago
This question seems to be testing my understanding of how VPLS services use forwarding databases (FDBs). I'll need to think carefully about the different options and how they relate to VPLS.
CU
Curtis
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. For a VPLS service, a separate FDB is maintained for each VPLS instance on the PE router to track the MAC addresses learned from that specific service. That sounds like option D to me.
GL
Glory
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. "Cost-benefit thinking" could apply to a few different areas of financial management. I'll need to re-read the question and options closely to determine the best answer.
JA
Janna
1 year ago
Assigning ownership seems like a good step, but I'm not sure if that alone would be the best way to enable an effective information asset classification process.
YA
Yasuko
1 year ago
Haha, I'll go with D. Gotta keep those MAC addresses on a tight leash, one FDB per VPLS service. Anything else would be like trying to herd cats, am I right?
JO
Johana
1 year ago
Cassie: Exactly, it's all about keeping things in order. Like herding cats, as you said.
CA
Cassie
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, it would definitely help keep things organized. Can't have those MAC addresses running wild.
DO
Dottie
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, D seems like the best option. One FDB per VPLS service makes sense.
HE
Helaine
1 year ago
Option D all the way! It's the only one that specifically mentions 'a separate FDB' for each VPLS service. The others don't seem to capture the nuance of how the FDB is handled in a VPLS setup.
TE
Terina
1 year ago
Option D definitely stands out as the best description of how an FDB is used in a VPLS service.
MA
Margarita
1 year ago
Yeah, having a separate FDB for each VPLS service makes it easier to track MAC addresses accurately.
SA
Sabine
1 year ago
I agree, option D is the most specific about how the FDB is maintained for each VPLS service.
LU
Lucina
1 year ago
I was a bit confused at first, but after reading the options carefully, I'm pretty sure D is the right choice. Maintaining a separate FDB for each VPLS service seems like the most logical approach.
NO
Norah
2 years ago
Hmm, I think option D is the correct answer. A separate FDB for each VPLS service makes sense to keep the MAC addresses organized and isolated.
IL
Ilene
1 year ago
Yes, it would make it easier to track MAC addresses learned from each specific service.
ST
Stephaine
1 year ago
I agree, having a separate FDB for each VPLS service would definitely help with organization.
IL
Iluminada
2 years ago
Why do you think D is the correct answer?
LA
Lang
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D.
IL
Iluminada
2 years ago
I think the answer is B.
LE
Lezlie
2 years ago
Hmm, I see your point. But I still think B makes more sense.
TR
Trinidad
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D.
LE
Lezlie
2 years ago
I think the answer is B.