Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nokia 4A0-104 Exam - Topic 2 Question 74 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-104 exam
Question #: 74
Topic #: 2
[All 4A0-104 Questions]

Which of the following statements best describes an FDB used in a VPLS service?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Coral at May 07, 2024, 07:32 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-104 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Mose
5 months ago
A is definitely wrong, VPLS needs an FDB to function properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brice
5 months ago
D seems right, separate FDBs for each service is logical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alva
5 months ago
Wait, are there really two FDBs for each service? That sounds complicated!
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
5 months ago
C makes more sense, it should track all VPLS services.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brigette
6 months ago
I think B is correct, FDBs track MACs on the PE router.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claudio
6 months ago
I vaguely remember that there could be multiple FDBs, but I’m not sure if it's two for each service or just one. I need to think about the multicast and broadcast traffic part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
6 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether there’s one FDB for all services or separate ones. I thought each VPLS might have its own FDB, but I can't recall clearly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
6 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I feel like option C sounds right since it mentions tracking MAC addresses for all VPLS services on the router.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timmy
6 months ago
I think I remember that an FDB is related to how MAC addresses are learned, but I'm not sure if it's for all traffic or just specific services.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
6 months ago
Ah, this is a tricky one. I'm torn between B and D. I know the FDB is used to track MAC addresses, but I'm not sure if it's for all traffic or just the VPLS services. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Britt
6 months ago
I'm pretty confident that the correct answer is C. The FDB on the PE router tracks MAC addresses learned from all VPLS services configured on that router, not just a single service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hobert
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know VPLS is a Layer 2 VPN service, but I'm not totally clear on the specifics of how the FDB works in that context. I'll have to review my notes to see if I can figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
6 months ago
This question seems to be testing my understanding of how VPLS services use forwarding databases (FDBs). I'll need to think carefully about the different options and how they relate to VPLS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Curtis
7 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. For a VPLS service, a separate FDB is maintained for each VPLS instance on the PE router to track the MAC addresses learned from that specific service. That sounds like option D to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. "Cost-benefit thinking" could apply to a few different areas of financial management. I'll need to re-read the question and options closely to determine the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janna
7 months ago
Assigning ownership seems like a good step, but I'm not sure if that alone would be the best way to enable an effective information asset classification process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yasuko
11 months ago
Haha, I'll go with D. Gotta keep those MAC addresses on a tight leash, one FDB per VPLS service. Anything else would be like trying to herd cats, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Johana
11 months ago
Cassie: Exactly, it's all about keeping things in order. Like herding cats, as you said.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassie
11 months ago
User 2: Yeah, it would definitely help keep things organized. Can't have those MAC addresses running wild.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
11 months ago
User 1: I agree, D seems like the best option. One FDB per VPLS service makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Helaine
12 months ago
Option D all the way! It's the only one that specifically mentions 'a separate FDB' for each VPLS service. The others don't seem to capture the nuance of how the FDB is handled in a VPLS setup.
upvoted 0 times
Terina
10 months ago
Option D definitely stands out as the best description of how an FDB is used in a VPLS service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarita
10 months ago
Yeah, having a separate FDB for each VPLS service makes it easier to track MAC addresses accurately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabine
11 months ago
I agree, option D is the most specific about how the FDB is maintained for each VPLS service.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lucina
12 months ago
I was a bit confused at first, but after reading the options carefully, I'm pretty sure D is the right choice. Maintaining a separate FDB for each VPLS service seems like the most logical approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
1 year ago
Hmm, I think option D is the correct answer. A separate FDB for each VPLS service makes sense to keep the MAC addresses organized and isolated.
upvoted 0 times
Ilene
12 months ago
Yes, it would make it easier to track MAC addresses learned from each specific service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
12 months ago
I agree, having a separate FDB for each VPLS service would definitely help with organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Iluminada
1 year ago
Why do you think D is the correct answer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lang
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
1 year ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
1 year ago
Hmm, I see your point. But I still think B makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
1 year ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel