Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nokia 4A0-104 Exam - Topic 2 Question 47 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-104 exam

Question #: 47
Topic #: 2

[All 4A0-104 Questions]

Which of the following best describes a VPWS?

ALayer 3 direct Internet access service.

BLayer 2 point-to-point service.

CLayer 2 multipoint-to-multipoint service.

DLayer 3 IP multipoint-to-multipoint VPN service.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Lai at Oct 24, 2022, 11:37 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-104 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Micaela

7 months ago

Surprised it's not just a simple point-to-point!

upvoted 0 times

...

Carlene

7 months ago

I agree, B seems right for VPWS.

upvoted 0 times

...

Teresita

7 months ago

Wait, multipoint-to-multipoint? Really?

upvoted 0 times

...

Melvin

8 months ago

I thought it was Layer 3?

upvoted 0 times

...

Tayna

8 months ago

It's definitely a Layer 2 service.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dick

8 months ago

I vaguely recall that VPWS is a Layer 2 service, but I can't remember if it’s direct access or something else.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ryan

8 months ago

I’m a bit confused; I thought VPWS was more about multipoint connections. Could it be option C instead?

upvoted 0 times

...

Ruby

8 months ago

I remember studying about VPWS, and I feel like it might be a Layer 2 point-to-point service, similar to other questions we practiced.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nu

8 months ago

I think VPWS is related to Layer 2 services, but I'm not sure if it's point-to-point or multipoint.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharita

8 months ago

This looks like a question about Macros Virtual Machine Common Properties, so I'll need to review my notes on that topic. I'm not totally sure which option is included, but I'll try to reason through it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Selma

8 months ago

I'm a little confused on the difference between the VDA Registration Port, XML SSL Port, and SDK Port. I'll need to double-check the Citrix documentation to make sure I understand each one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alisha

8 months ago

This one seems pretty straightforward. The question is asking about the protocol that the 10G Wire Speed Encryption line card encrypts, so I'll need to think about which protocol is commonly encrypted at that layer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hubert

8 months ago

Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to focus on the fact that the user can't access the HTTP application. That points to an issue with the virtual server configuration, not the application itself. I'm leaning towards option D as the most likely cause.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gerald

1 year ago

I'm just going to go with my gut and choose B). I mean, who doesn't love a good point-to-point service? It's like the Tinder of networking!

upvoted 0 times

Lili

11 months ago

User 4: Point-to-point all the way! It's like networking soulmates.

upvoted 0 times

...

Venita

12 months ago

User 3: Definitely, B) is the way to go for VPWS.

upvoted 0 times

...

Edna

12 months ago

User 2: Yeah, I agree. It's all about that direct connection.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gilberto

1 year ago

User 1: I think VPWS is more like a Layer 2 point-to-point service.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Eloisa

1 year ago

Hmm, I'm not sure. Maybe D) Layer 3 IP multipoint-to-multipoint VPN service? Isn't VPWS supposed to provide a secure, virtual private network connection?

upvoted 0 times

Rebbecca

12 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think VPWS is more about point-to-point connections.

upvoted 0 times

...

Albina

12 months ago

I believe it's actually B) Layer 2 point-to-point service.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nohemi

1 year ago

I think you're right, VPWS does provide a secure VPN connection.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Veronika

1 year ago

I'm leaning towards C) Layer 2 multipoint-to-multipoint service. Wouldn't that allow for more flexible connectivity between multiple sites?

upvoted 0 times

Twanna

12 months ago

I agree with you, C) Layer 2 multipoint-to-multipoint service would be the best option for flexible connectivity between multiple sites.

upvoted 0 times

...

Clare

12 months ago

I think B) Layer 2 point-to-point service might be more suitable for direct connections between two sites.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gladys

12 months ago

Yes, you are correct. Layer 2 multipoint-to-multipoint service does provide more flexible connectivity between multiple sites.

upvoted 0 times

...

Meaghan

1 year ago

A: So, are you going to go with option C) for VPWS?

upvoted 0 times

...

Leontine

1 year ago

B: I agree, it would definitely allow for better connectivity between multiple sites.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gabriele

1 year ago

A: I think you're right, C) Layer 2 multipoint-to-multipoint service does offer more flexibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Kerry

1 year ago

David, you're killing me with that analogy! But seriously, I think B) is the way to go here.

upvoted 0 times

Leanna

1 year ago

Yeah, I think B) is the best option for VPWS.

upvoted 0 times

...

Trinidad

1 year ago

I agree, B) Layer 2 point-to-point service sounds right.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Vivienne

1 year ago

I'm not sure, but I think it's between B) and C). Layer 2 multipoint-to-multipoint service sounds plausible too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Denae

1 year ago

I agree with Yolande, VPWS is definitely a Layer 2 service.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yolande

1 year ago

I think the answer is B) Layer 2 point-to-point service.

upvoted 0 times

...