Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nokia Exam 4A0-104 Topic 2 Question 47 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-104 exam
Question #: 47
Topic #: 2
[All 4A0-104 Questions]

Which of the following best describes a VPWS?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Gerald
1 months ago
I'm just going to go with my gut and choose B). I mean, who doesn't love a good point-to-point service? It's like the Tinder of networking!
upvoted 0 times
Venita
3 days ago
User 3: Definitely, B) is the way to go for VPWS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
11 days ago
User 2: Yeah, I agree. It's all about that direct connection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilberto
21 days ago
User 1: I think VPWS is more like a Layer 2 point-to-point service.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eloisa
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Maybe D) Layer 3 IP multipoint-to-multipoint VPN service? Isn't VPWS supposed to provide a secure, virtual private network connection?
upvoted 0 times
Rebbecca
13 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think VPWS is more about point-to-point connections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albina
15 days ago
I believe it's actually B) Layer 2 point-to-point service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nohemi
18 days ago
I think you're right, VPWS does provide a secure VPN connection.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Veronika
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards C) Layer 2 multipoint-to-multipoint service. Wouldn't that allow for more flexible connectivity between multiple sites?
upvoted 0 times
Twanna
8 days ago
I agree with you, C) Layer 2 multipoint-to-multipoint service would be the best option for flexible connectivity between multiple sites.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clare
9 days ago
I think B) Layer 2 point-to-point service might be more suitable for direct connections between two sites.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
13 days ago
Yes, you are correct. Layer 2 multipoint-to-multipoint service does provide more flexible connectivity between multiple sites.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meaghan
17 days ago
A: So, are you going to go with option C) for VPWS?
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
24 days ago
B: I agree, it would definitely allow for better connectivity between multiple sites.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gabriele
1 months ago
A: I think you're right, C) Layer 2 multipoint-to-multipoint service does offer more flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kerry
2 months ago
David, you're killing me with that analogy! But seriously, I think B) is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
Leanna
29 days ago
Yeah, I think B) is the best option for VPWS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
1 months ago
I agree, B) Layer 2 point-to-point service sounds right.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vivienne
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it's between B) and C). Layer 2 multipoint-to-multipoint service sounds plausible too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
3 months ago
I agree with Yolande, VPWS is definitely a Layer 2 service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
3 months ago
I think the answer is B) Layer 2 point-to-point service.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel