New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nokia 4A0-103 Exam - Topic 5 Question 83 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-103 exam
Question #: 83
Topic #: 5
[All 4A0-103 Questions]

Click on the exhibit.

LSP 1's link between routers R3 and R6 has failed, and the RESV state at router R3 has timed out. Which of the following actions will router R3 initiate?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Andree
3 months ago
Seems odd, but I trust the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claudio
3 months ago
Wait, isn’t R1 the wrong direction?
upvoted 0 times
...
Idella
3 months ago
I thought it would be C, but I guess not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caren
4 months ago
Definitely A, that’s the standard response!
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearlene
4 months ago
Router R3 will send a PathTear message towards R6.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
4 months ago
I thought it was a ResvTear message that gets sent out, but now I’m confused about whether it goes to R1 or R6.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirby
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards option A, sending a PathTear to R6, but I might be mixing it up with another scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patrick
4 months ago
I remember a similar question where we had to identify the correct message type. I feel like it's definitely a PathTear, but I can't recall the exact destination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
5 months ago
I think when the RESV state times out, R3 should send a PathTear message, but I'm not sure if it goes to R6 or R1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evette
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident that the correct answer is C. When an LSP link fails, the upstream router (R3 in this case) needs to send a ResvTear message towards the downstream router (R6) to tear down the reservation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarita
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused here. Since the link failed, wouldn't R3 need to send a PathTear message instead of a ResvTear? I'm not sure if the RESV state timing out changes the required action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannetta
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The question states that the LSP 1 link between R3 and R6 has failed, and the RESV state at R3 has timed out. So R3 should send a ResvTear message towards R6 to tear down the reservation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kip
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky RSVP question. I'll need to carefully review the information about the link failure and RESV state timeout to determine the correct action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myrtie
5 months ago
Okay, first I'll carefully look at what the image lists as potential assets. Those five items look like the key things I need to check.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johna
5 months ago
Wait, I thought Splunk created report acceleration summaries when indexing events. But now I'm second-guessing myself. This is a tricky question - I'll have to review my notes to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aretha
5 months ago
I think the key here is to focus on the "index patterns" part of the question. That sounds like it's referring to a Kibana feature, so I'm going to go with option C and say the index patterns should be created in Kibana.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tom
2 years ago
I believe sending a ResvTear message toward router R6 could also be a valid option, as it would help in tearing down the reservation state.
upvoted 0 times
...
Suzan
2 years ago
But what if router R3 decides to send a ResvTear message toward router R6 instead?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeniffer
2 years ago
I agree with Glory. Sending a PathTear message towards router R6 seems like the correct action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
2 years ago
I think router R3 will initiate a PathTear message towards router R6.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel