New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nokia 4A0-103 Exam - Topic 5 Question 75 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-103 exam
Question #: 75
Topic #: 5
[All 4A0-103 Questions]

Click on the exhibit.

An LDP tunnel is established on router R1 towards router R6. The link between routers R2 and R4 goes down. What will happen to the MPLS data traffic to router R6 IMMEDIATELY after the link goes down?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Arlette
3 months ago
I thought labels from both next-hops would prevent data loss.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
3 months ago
Fast reroute on R2 should keep the traffic flowing, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? What if there's a backup path?
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
4 months ago
Definitely agree with option B on this one!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
4 months ago
I think MPLS traffic will be discarded until IGP finds a new path.
upvoted 0 times
...
Princess
4 months ago
I recall that fast reroute can help maintain traffic flow, so maybe option D is correct? But I need to think about how that interacts with the link going down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
4 months ago
I think option C sounds right because if R1 has labels from both next-hops, it should still forward traffic, but I’m not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anissa
4 months ago
This question feels similar to one we practiced where a link failure caused traffic rerouting. I think it might depend on whether there's a backup path.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgeanna
5 months ago
I remember studying how LDP tunnels work, but I'm not sure if the traffic would be discarded immediately or if there would be some failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
5 months ago
I'm not totally sure about this one. I'll need to think through the MPLS failover mechanisms and how they interact with the IGP. Hmm, this will require some careful analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ezekiel
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. The key here is understanding how MPLS reacts when a link goes down on the LDP tunnel path. I think I have a strategy to work through this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beatriz
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused about how the LDP tunnel and IGP routing interact in this scenario. I'll need to review my MPLS knowledge.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alida
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky MPLS question. I'll need to think through the MPLS behavior carefully here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlette
5 months ago
This seems straightforward - the MPLS traffic should be discarded until the IGP finds a new next-hop. I'm confident I can select the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maurine
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the OSPF protocol. I'll need to think through the key advantages to make sure I answer this correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
5 months ago
Ugh, I'm not too familiar with Cisco WSA configurations. Let me think this through step-by-step and see if I can figure out the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
9 months ago
Wait, MPLS has backup dancers? I thought it was more like a one-man show, just labeling everything in sight!
upvoted 0 times
Enola
9 months ago
I guess MPLS data traffic has some backup plans after all!
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
9 months ago
C) MPLS data traffic will not be discarded because router R1 received labels from both next-hops, routers R2 and R3.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
9 months ago
A) MPLS data traffic will be discarded until the IGP finds a new next-hop to router R3.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Katina
10 months ago
C is the answer, no doubt. It's like having a backup dancer in case your main one trips on stage. MPLS is the diva, and the labels are the backup dancers!
upvoted 0 times
Jamie
8 months ago
Exactly, it ensures that the traffic keeps flowing smoothly even if there are disruptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecil
9 months ago
It's like a safety net in case something goes wrong with the primary path.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valda
9 months ago
I agree, having a backup path is crucial for MPLS traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Winfred
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm still a bit confused. Is there a way to test this in a lab environment? I'd love to see it in action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiffiny
10 months ago
Aha! I think C is the correct answer. If R1 received labels from both next-hops, it can continue forwarding traffic even if the link between R2 and R4 goes down.
upvoted 0 times
Sherman
9 months ago
I think D is the correct answer. Fast reroute capability on R2 should ensure that the MPLS data traffic is not discarded.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
9 months ago
But what if the link between R2 and R4 goes down? Will the traffic still be forwarded to R6?
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
10 months ago
I agree, C seems like the correct answer. R1 having labels from both next-hops should help in forwarding traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eulah
10 months ago
The answer seems to be C, but I'm not sure why. I need to understand how MPLS label distribution works in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
Anastacia
8 months ago
That makes sense. So even if one link goes down, the traffic can still reach its destination through the other path.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
8 months ago
No, the MPLS data traffic will not be discarded because router R1 received labels from both next-hops, routers R2 and R3.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
8 months ago
But what if the link between R2 and R4 goes down? Will the traffic still reach R6?
upvoted 0 times
...
Patria
10 months ago
I think the answer is C because router R1 received labels from both next-hops, routers R2 and R3.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Xuan
11 months ago
But what if the standby secondary path is not configured?
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xuan
11 months ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel