MENU
An LSP is enabled with one-to-one fast reroute and node protection. What action does the PLR take if node protection cannot be provided?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium 4A0-103 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
38 comments · newest first
TO
Toi
11 months ago
I remember this from class, it's all about maintaining connectivity!
CO
Cortney
12 months ago
I disagree, I feel like it should just bring down the primary LSP-path instead.
JU
Justine
12 months ago
Wait, so the PLR just changes the PATH message? That seems odd.
TO
Tonette
1 year ago
Definitely, option C makes the most sense here!
DA
Darrel
1 year ago
I think the PLR tries to provide link protection if node protection fails.
RE
Reuben
1 year ago
I don’t think the PLR would bring down the primary LSP-path; that seems too drastic. It has to have another option, right?
KY
Kyoko
1 year ago
I’m a bit confused about this one. I thought the PLR would just disregard the request after a few attempts, but that doesn’t seem right now.
TR
Tran
1 year ago
I remember a practice question where the PLR had to handle a similar situation, and I feel like it changed the PATH message.
DW
Dwight
1 year ago
I think if node protection fails, the PLR might try to switch to link protection, but I'm not entirely sure.
PA
Paz
1 year ago
Hmm, this question seems a bit tricky. I'll need to think carefully about the differences between Visualforce controls and the CCRZ environment.
AL
Aleisha
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. The question is asking about the risk response, but it's not clear to me what the actual risk is. Is the risk that the project won't have enough software licenses? Or is the risk that the project will go over budget? I need to think this through more carefully.
TO
Tonette
1 year ago
I remember we practiced questions about database migration tools, and I'm leaning towards D.DTS since it often handles such scenarios well.
JU
Junita
1 year ago
This question is a real node-ache. Time to use my 'phone-a-friend' lifeline!
TY
Tyra
1 year ago
I'm just hoping the answer isn't 'All of the above' - that would really reroute my day!
AL
Aleta
1 year ago
B) The PLR disregards the request after three failed attempts.
NO
Novella
1 year ago
C) The PLR changes the PATH message to request link protection.
KA
Kaitlyn
1 year ago
A) The PLR attempts to provide link protection.
AN
Annice
1 year ago
A is a logical option. If node protection can't be achieved, the PLR should attempt to provide link protection instead.
MA
Marcos
1 year ago
B is a bit strange. The PLR disregarding the request after three failed attempts doesn't sound like the proper behavior.
JE
Jenise
1 year ago
B) The PLR disregards the request after three failed attempts.
LE
Leota
1 year ago
C) The PLR changes the PATH message to request link protection.
GE
Geraldo
1 year ago
A) The PLR attempts to provide link protection.
AL
Alisha
1 year ago
D seems like the right choice. If node protection is not possible, the PLR should bring down the primary LSP-path.
JA
Jade
1 year ago
D) The PLR brings down the primary LSP-path.
AD
Adelina
1 year ago
C) The PLR changes the PATH message to request link protection.
JA
Jade
1 year ago
A) The PLR attempts to provide link protection.
ET
Ethan
1 year ago
I think C is the correct answer. The PLR should change the PATH message to request link protection if node protection cannot be provided.
AR
Arlyne
1 year ago
Then the PLR attempts to provide node protection.
JU
Judy
1 year ago
But what if link protection is not available either?
ST
Stephania
1 year ago
I agree, the PLR should change the PATH message to request link protection.
TE
Teresita
1 year ago
I think C is the correct answer.
DO
Dorothea
1 year ago
Then the PLR attempts to provide node protection.
JO
Johnetta
1 year ago
But what if link protection is also not available?
JE
Jennie
1 year ago
I agree, the PLR should change the PATH message to request link protection.
JE
Jerrod
1 year ago
I think C is the correct answer.
AU
Audry
2 years ago
That makes sense, it's important to have some form of protection in place.
KE
Kenny
2 years ago
I think the PLR attempts to provide link protection instead.
AU
Audry
2 years ago
What does the PLR do if node protection cannot be provided?