Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nokia 4A0-103 Exam - Topic 5 Question 66 Discussion

An LSP is enabled with one-to-one fast reroute and node protection. What action does the PLR take if node protection cannot be provided?
B) The PLR disregards the request after three failed attempts.
A) The PLR attempts to provide link protection.
C) The PLR changes the PATH message to request link protection.
D) The PLR brings down the primary LSP-path.

Nokia 4A0-103 Exam - Topic 5 Question 66 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-103 exam
Question #: 66
Topic #: 5
[All 4A0-103 Questions]

An LSP is enabled with one-to-one fast reroute and node protection. What action does the PLR take if node protection cannot be provided?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Quentin at Feb 25, 2023, 11:21 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-103 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Toi
8 months ago
I remember this from class, it's all about maintaining connectivity!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cortney
9 months ago
I disagree, I feel like it should just bring down the primary LSP-path instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
9 months ago
Wait, so the PLR just changes the PATH message? That seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
9 months ago
Definitely, option C makes the most sense here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrel
9 months ago
I think the PLR tries to provide link protection if node protection fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reuben
9 months ago
I don’t think the PLR would bring down the primary LSP-path; that seems too drastic. It has to have another option, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kyoko
9 months ago
I’m a bit confused about this one. I thought the PLR would just disregard the request after a few attempts, but that doesn’t seem right now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tran
9 months ago
I remember a practice question where the PLR had to handle a similar situation, and I feel like it changed the PATH message.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dwight
10 months ago
I think if node protection fails, the PLR might try to switch to link protection, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paz
10 months ago
Hmm, this question seems a bit tricky. I'll need to think carefully about the differences between Visualforce controls and the CCRZ environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleisha
10 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. The question is asking about the risk response, but it's not clear to me what the actual risk is. Is the risk that the project won't have enough software licenses? Or is the risk that the project will go over budget? I need to think this through more carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
10 months ago
I remember we practiced questions about database migration tools, and I'm leaning towards D.DTS since it often handles such scenarios well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
1 year ago
This question is a real node-ache. Time to use my 'phone-a-friend' lifeline!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
1 year ago
I'm just hoping the answer isn't 'All of the above' - that would really reroute my day!
upvoted 0 times
Aleta
1 year ago
B) The PLR disregards the request after three failed attempts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
1 year ago
C) The PLR changes the PATH message to request link protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
1 year ago
A) The PLR attempts to provide link protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Annice
1 year ago
A is a logical option. If node protection can't be achieved, the PLR should attempt to provide link protection instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marcos
1 year ago
B is a bit strange. The PLR disregarding the request after three failed attempts doesn't sound like the proper behavior.
upvoted 0 times
Jenise
1 year ago
B) The PLR disregards the request after three failed attempts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
1 year ago
C) The PLR changes the PATH message to request link protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geraldo
1 year ago
A) The PLR attempts to provide link protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alisha
1 year ago
D seems like the right choice. If node protection is not possible, the PLR should bring down the primary LSP-path.
upvoted 0 times
Jade
1 year ago
D) The PLR brings down the primary LSP-path.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
1 year ago
C) The PLR changes the PATH message to request link protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jade
1 year ago
A) The PLR attempts to provide link protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ethan
1 year ago
I think C is the correct answer. The PLR should change the PATH message to request link protection if node protection cannot be provided.
upvoted 0 times
Arlyne
1 year ago
Then the PLR attempts to provide node protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
1 year ago
But what if link protection is not available either?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephania
1 year ago
I agree, the PLR should change the PATH message to request link protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teresita
1 year ago
I think C is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothea
1 year ago
Then the PLR attempts to provide node protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnetta
1 year ago
But what if link protection is also not available?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennie
1 year ago
I agree, the PLR should change the PATH message to request link protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerrod
1 year ago
I think C is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Audry
1 year ago
That makes sense, it's important to have some form of protection in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
1 year ago
I think the PLR attempts to provide link protection instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audry
1 year ago
What does the PLR do if node protection cannot be provided?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel