Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nokia 4A0-103 Exam - Topic 3 Question 85 Discussion

Click on the exhibit.What is the possible reason that the label for prefix 192.10.1.2/32 is not active?
B) The router does not have a route to reach to the prefix 192.10.1.2/32.
A) The router does not have a route to reach to the peer 10.10.10.2/32.
C) The router does not have an export policy defined to export the prefix 192.10.1.2/32 into LDP.
D) The router receives an invalid label for the prefix 192.10.1.2/32 from its peer.

Nokia 4A0-103 Exam - Topic 3 Question 85 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-103 exam
Question #: 85
Topic #: 3
[All 4A0-103 Questions]

Click on the exhibit.

What is the possible reason that the label for prefix 192.10.1.2/32 is not active?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Albina at Apr 20, 2024, 06:33 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-103 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Ramonita
8 months ago
Nah, I disagree with C. Export policies are usually set up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Percy
8 months ago
I think C is also a possibility, but not as common.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgilio
8 months ago
Wait, could it be D? Invalid labels happen sometimes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
8 months ago
Definitely B, that's the most likely reason.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lajuana
9 months ago
The router needs a route to the prefix to activate it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
9 months ago
I'm leaning towards option B, but I vaguely recall something about needing a route to the peer as well. It's a bit confusing!
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
9 months ago
I feel like the invalid label option could be a possibility too, but I need to double-check how labels work in LDP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassandra
9 months ago
I remember a similar question where the export policy was the problem. Could it be that there's no export policy for this prefix?
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
9 months ago
I think the issue might be related to the router not having a route to reach the prefix itself, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
9 months ago
This seems like a pretty straightforward networking question. I'm confident I can figure out the right answer by analyzing the information provided in the exhibit and the answer choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clarinda
9 months ago
Alright, let's think this through step-by-step. The key is to identify the potential reasons why the label for that prefix might not be active. I'll carefully consider each answer choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrin
9 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The question is asking about the prefix 192.10.1.2/32, so I'll need to focus on that in the exhibit and the answer choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
10 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully examine the exhibit and the answer choices to figure out the most likely reason.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
10 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this one. The exhibit shows some routing information, but I'm not sure exactly what it's all about. I'll need to read the question and answers more closely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ozell
10 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to identify the three tasks that can be performed using Azure AD Identity Protection, which include automating risk detection and remediation, as well as investigating user authentication risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
10 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a straightforward question. I think the "instanceof" operator is a good example of a language construct in JavaScript.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammy
2 years ago
I agree with option C makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tricia
2 years ago
That's a good point, but I still think it's option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phil
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe it's option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tricia
2 years ago
I think the possible reason is option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlene
2 years ago
That's true. Both options seem plausible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oren
2 years ago
But it could also be option C) The router does not have an export policy defined to export the prefix 192.10.1.2/32 into LDP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlene
2 years ago
I think the possible reason is option A) The router does not have a route to reach the peer 10.10.10.2/32.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel