Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nokia Exam 4A0-103 Topic 3 Question 110 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-103 exam
Question #: 110
Topic #: 3
[All 4A0-103 Questions]

Click on the exhibit.

An LSP path is established on router R1 toward router R6. After router R4 detects that the link between routers R4 and R6 goes down, which of the following will affect the failure propagation time?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Yuette
1 months ago
D, definitely D. I mean, come on, R1 has to do all the work here. Those other options are just a warm-up for the main event. I bet R1 is doing pushups between router hops just to stay ahead of the game.
upvoted 0 times
Clarence
5 days ago
Yeah, R1 really has to be on top of things in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarita
15 days ago
But D is crucial, R1 signaling an alternate path is key for failure propagation time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
20 days ago
I think A is also important, R4 needs to send a PATH Error message quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Loren
1 months ago
C) The time router R4 takes to send a RESV Error message to the head-end router. This would be my pick, as it's the last step in the failure notification process before the head-end can react.
upvoted 0 times
Lilli
17 days ago
That's important too, but I think sending the RESV Error message is the final step in the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
26 days ago
But what about the time it takes for R4 to detect the RSVP Hello message timeout from R6?
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarett
1 months ago
I agree, sending the RESV Error message is crucial for failure notification.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jamal
2 months ago
But what about the time router R1 takes to signal an alternate path through router R3? Could that also affect the failure propagation time?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ulysses
2 months ago
I agree with Melvin. The faster router R4 sends the PATH Error message, the quicker the failure can be propagated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Argelia
2 months ago
I think the answer is D. R1 has to do the heavy lifting here, so it's the key factor in the failure propagation time. Though, I do wonder if the routers have enough coffee to keep them running at peak performance.
upvoted 0 times
Casie
6 days ago
I hope the routers are well-caffeinated for this task!
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryanne
7 days ago
D) The time router R1 takes to signal an alternate path through router R3.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
8 days ago
A) The time router R4 takes to send a PATH Error message toward the head-end router.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fidelia
2 months ago
B) The time router R4 takes to detect RSVP Hello message timeout from router R6. Detecting the failure is the first step, so this option should have the most impact on the failure propagation time.
upvoted 0 times
Joseph
25 days ago
That makes sense. Option B is likely the most important factor in failure propagation time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winifred
1 months ago
Router R4 needs to quickly detect the RSVP Hello message timeout to inform the head-end router.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
1 months ago
Yes, I agree. Once the failure is detected, the propagation time can start.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
2 months ago
I think option B is correct because detecting the failure is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Melvin
2 months ago
I think the failure propagation time will be affected by the time router R4 takes to send a PATH Error message.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
2 months ago
D) The time router R1 takes to signal an alternate path through router R3. This seems like the most logical answer, as the failure propagation time would depend on how quickly the head-end router can establish a new path.
upvoted 0 times
Ryan
1 months ago
Yes, router R1 signaling an alternate path through router R3 would definitely affect the failure propagation time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maxima
1 months ago
I think option D makes sense, the head-end router would need to find an alternate path quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel