Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nokia 4A0-103 Exam - Topic 2 Question 111 Discussion

Posted by Clare on May 06, 2025 at 12:38 AM

Which of the following about RSVP-TE is FALSE?

Suggested Answer: A

Get Premium 4A0-103 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
40 comments · newest first
IZ
Izetta 10 months ago
I thought it followed the best path too, but maybe I'm wrong?
LA
Lashandra 10 months ago
CAC is definitely a thing in RSVP-TE, so B is true.
AN
Antonio 10 months ago
Totally agree, D doesn't sound right.
RE
Reuben 11 months ago
I think D is the false one.
DO
Dorthy 11 months ago
Wait, are we sure about A? That seems off.
SH
Shaniqua 11 months ago
I feel like I saw something about RSVP-TE supporting LSPs that follow the best path, but I might be mixing it up with another protocol.
MO
Moira 11 months ago
The LSPs with traffic engineering constraints sounds familiar, but I can't recall if they follow the IGP best path or not.
KE
Kenneth 11 months ago
I remember practicing a question about CAC in RSVP-TE, and I think it does prevent resource overbooking, so that one should be true.
RE
Reyes 12 months ago
I think RSVP-TE does support traffic protection, but I'm not sure about the IGP equal cost paths part.
GL
Glynda 12 months ago
Okay, I think the key here is remembering that RSVP-TE is all about traffic engineering and not just following the IGP best path. That should help me eliminate the right answer.
SO
Sol 1 year ago
Wait, I thought RSVP-TE had CAC to prevent overbooking. Is that not the case? I'll need to double-check the details on that.
MA
Maryrose 1 year ago
I'm pretty confident that RSVP-TE doesn't use IGP equal cost paths for protection. That's one of the key differences from regular routing.
NA
Nana 1 year ago
Okay, let's see. I know RSVP-TE supports traffic engineering, but does it really follow the IGP best path? I'm not sure about that one.
AL
Alayna 1 year ago
Hmm, this one seems tricky. I'll need to think carefully about the differences between RSVP-TE and regular IGP routing.
LE
Leatha 1 year ago
Haha, RSVP-TE? More like RSVP-'Terrible' if you ask me. Just kidding, it's an important protocol, but I'm still trying to wrap my head around it.
DU
Dusti 1 year ago
I'm pretty sure all the options are true, except for D. RSVP-TE is all about traffic engineering, not following the IGP best path.
TA
Talia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dusti
So, the correct answer is D.
JO
Joseph 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dusti
Yeah, it doesn't support LSPs that follow the IGP best path.
AN
Andrew 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dusti
I think option D is the false one then.
MO
Mozell 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dusti
I think you're right, it doesn't support LSPs that follow the IGP best path.
DI
Dino 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dusti
Yes, it definitely supports traffic protection using IGP equal cost paths.
MY
Myra 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dusti
I agree, RSVP-TE is all about traffic engineering.
CL
Cletus 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dusti
I agree, RSVP-TE is all about traffic engineering.
SE
Serita 1 year ago
I agree with Kenny, the correct answer is C) It supports LSPs with traffic engineering constraints.
KE
Kenny 1 year ago
But RSVP-TE actually supports traffic engineering constraints, so I think the answer is C).
EM
Emilio 1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D) It supports LSPs that follow the IGP best path.
BE
Bethanie 1 year ago
B and C seem correct, but I'm not sure about A and D. Gotta study more on RSVP-TE!
TH
Thaddeus 1 year ago
↳ replying to Bethanie
User 3: I'm not sure about D, does RSVP-TE really support LSPs that follow the IGP best path?
RE
Refugia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Bethanie
User 2: I agree, A is definitely false. It's important to understand all the features of RSVP-TE.
FL
Fletcher 1 year ago
↳ replying to Bethanie
User 1: I think A is false, RSVP-TE doesn't support traffic protection using IGP equal cost paths.
KE
Kenny 1 year ago
I think the answer is A) It supports traffic protection using IGP equal cost paths.
SU
Sunshine 1 year ago
Option A is definitely false. RSVP-TE supports traffic protection, but not using IGP equal cost paths.
NA
Nada 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sunshine
I believe option D is also true, RSVP-TE supports LSPs that follow the IGP best path.
KA
Katheryn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sunshine
You're right, option C is true, RSVP-TE does support LSPs with traffic engineering constraints.
DI
Dion 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sunshine
I think option B is also false, RSVP-TE does support CAC.
DY
Dyan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sunshine
I agree, option A is definitely false.
JO
Joanna 1 year ago
I think option D is false. RSVP-TE doesn't follow the IGP best path, it supports traffic engineering constraints.
LE
Levi 1 year ago
↳ replying to Joanna
C) It supports LSPs with traffic engineering constraints.
AR
Armando 1 year ago
↳ replying to Joanna
B) It supports CAC to prevent resource overbooking.
ER
Erick 1 year ago
↳ replying to Joanna
A) It supports traffic protection using IGP equal cost paths.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel