New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nokia 4A0-103 Exam - Topic 1 Question 77 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-103 exam
Question #: 77
Topic #: 1
[All 4A0-103 Questions]

Click on the exhibit.

An LDP-over-RSVP tunnel is established between PE-1 and PE-2. Which of the following is NOT required to protect the LDP-over-RSVP tunnel?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Weldon at Nov 27, 2023, 05:43 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-103 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Glory
3 months ago
ABR-1 needing T-LDP sessions to all ABRs in area 0? Sounds right!
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
3 months ago
Fast reroute on all RSVP-TE LSPs seems excessive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanda
4 months ago
Wait, do we really need a full mesh of RSVP-TE LSPs?
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
4 months ago
Totally agree, that's a must!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawna
4 months ago
PE-1 needs T-LDP sessions to ABR-1 and ABR-2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charisse
4 months ago
Fast reroute seems crucial for RSVP-TE, but I'm not convinced it's required for the LDP-over-RSVP tunnel specifically.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
4 months ago
I feel like T-LDP sessions are important, but I can't recall if they're needed for all ABRs in area 0.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
4 months ago
I think option B sounds familiar; I practiced a question about RSVP-TE LSPs needing a full mesh before.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
5 months ago
I remember studying LDP and RSVP interactions, but I'm not entirely sure which one doesn't need protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
5 months ago
This is a good opportunity to apply my knowledge of MPLS technologies. I'll methodically go through each option and evaluate whether it's necessary for the LDP-over-RSVP tunnel protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blair
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to identify which configuration is not required to protect the LDP-over-RSVP tunnel. Let me re-read the options and see if I can eliminate the correct one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracey
5 months ago
This looks like a tricky MPLS question. I'll need to carefully review the options and think through the LDP-over-RSVP tunnel requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tish
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the different protocols and configurations mentioned. I'll need to make sure I understand the relationship between LDP, RSVP-TE, and the ABR/PE routers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
5 months ago
Okay, I've got a plan for this. First, I'll need to add a new backend pool for VMSS2. Then I'll create a new HTTP setting and listener to handle the traffic for www.adatum.com. Finally, I'll add a new routing rule to direct that traffic to the VMSS2 backend pool. Easy peasy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nenita
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I need to make sure I'm considering all the possible outcomes based on the information provided in the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
5 months ago
Ah, I remember learning about the AWS TGW Orchestrator in class. That feature sounds like it matches what the question is asking for, so I'll go with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
5 months ago
Option B seems more like what we covered about premium estimates, but I'm a bit confused about how that ties into the ACR concept directly.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel