MENU
Click on the exhibit.
An LDP-over-RSVP tunnel is established between PE-1 and PE-2. Which of the following is NOT required to protect the LDP-over-RSVP tunnel?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium 4A0-103 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
17 comments · newest first
GL
Glory
11 months ago
ABR-1 needing T-LDP sessions to all ABRs in area 0? Sounds right!
ME
Merissa
11 months ago
Fast reroute on all RSVP-TE LSPs seems excessive.
SA
Sanda
11 months ago
Wait, do we really need a full mesh of RSVP-TE LSPs?
NO
Novella
12 months ago
Totally agree, that's a must!
TA
Tawna
12 months ago
PE-1 needs T-LDP sessions to ABR-1 and ABR-2.
CH
Charisse
12 months ago
Fast reroute seems crucial for RSVP-TE, but I'm not convinced it's required for the LDP-over-RSVP tunnel specifically.
TO
Tonette
1 year ago
I feel like T-LDP sessions are important, but I can't recall if they're needed for all ABRs in area 0.
AV
Avery
1 year ago
I think option B sounds familiar; I practiced a question about RSVP-TE LSPs needing a full mesh before.
AS
Ashton
1 year ago
I remember studying LDP and RSVP interactions, but I'm not entirely sure which one doesn't need protection.
BO
Bobbye
1 year ago
This is a good opportunity to apply my knowledge of MPLS technologies. I'll methodically go through each option and evaluate whether it's necessary for the LDP-over-RSVP tunnel protection.
BL
Blair
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to identify which configuration is not required to protect the LDP-over-RSVP tunnel. Let me re-read the options and see if I can eliminate the correct one.
TR
Tracey
1 year ago
This looks like a tricky MPLS question. I'll need to carefully review the options and think through the LDP-over-RSVP tunnel requirements.
TI
Tish
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the different protocols and configurations mentioned. I'll need to make sure I understand the relationship between LDP, RSVP-TE, and the ABR/PE routers.
CO
Cordelia
1 year ago
Okay, I've got a plan for this. First, I'll need to add a new backend pool for VMSS2. Then I'll create a new HTTP setting and listener to handle the traffic for www.adatum.com. Finally, I'll add a new routing rule to direct that traffic to the VMSS2 backend pool. Easy peasy!
NE
Nenita
1 year ago
This is a tricky one. I need to make sure I'm considering all the possible outcomes based on the information provided in the question.
RO
Roxane
1 year ago
Ah, I remember learning about the AWS TGW Orchestrator in class. That feature sounds like it matches what the question is asking for, so I'll go with that.
AM
Amber
1 year ago
Option B seems more like what we covered about premium estimates, but I'm a bit confused about how that ties into the ACR concept directly.