Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nokia 4A0-102 Exam - Topic 3 Question 59 Discussion

Posted by Tish on Jun 23, 2024 at 10:51 AM

Which of the following regarding BGP confederations is FALSE?

Suggested Answer: D

Get Premium 4A0-102 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
38 comments · newest first
TE
Tegan 11 months ago
I agree with Tien, D is misleading.
RO
Roselle 11 months ago
Wait, can member ASs really use route reflection? That seems odd!
RA
Raymon 11 months ago
B sounds right to me, each AS is independent.
TI
Tien 11 months ago
I think D is the false one, not all need to be fully meshed.
TY
Ty 12 months ago
A is definitely true, confederations act as one AS.
RI
Rikki 12 months ago
I thought all member ASs had to be fully meshed, but now I'm questioning that. Maybe it's option D after all?
CO
Colene 1 year ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I recall that member ASs can indeed use route reflection, which makes me lean towards option D being false.
ER
Erick 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like option A could be misleading since it says the entire confederation is seen as one AS.
NA
Nadine 1 year ago
I think option D might be the false one because I remember something about not needing full mesh in a confederation.
MA
Mari 1 year ago
I've got a good feeling about this. I think the answer is B - within a confederation, each member AS is considered a stand-alone AS. The other options don't sound quite right to me.
RO
Roxanne 1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through. I know that within a confederation, each member AS is considered a stand-alone AS, and the entire confederation is viewed as a single AS by an eBGP peer. I'm not sure about the route reflection and full mesh requirements, though.
DO
Dorthy 1 year ago
I'm pretty confident about this one. I think the answer is D - member ASs must be fully meshed within a confederation.
DE
Denny 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this. I'll need to review my notes on BGP confederations to make sure I understand the key differences between the options.
YU
Yuriko 1 year ago
Net working capital, that's the one! I remember learning about that in class. Companies want to have more current assets than current liabilities to maintain a healthy financial position.
AA
Aaron 1 year ago
I remember learning about this in class, but I'm having trouble recalling the specifics. I'll need to review my notes to make sure I get this right.
JU
Julianna 1 year ago
Looks like option D is the correct answer. Fully meshed member ASs? That's like asking for a perfectly harmonious family reunion - good luck with that!
JA
Jamal 1 year ago
↳ replying to Julianna
Definitely not a practical solution in a large network.
SA
Sarah 1 year ago
↳ replying to Julianna
D) Member ASs must be fully meshed within a confederation.
YE
Yesenia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Julianna
Yeah, fully meshed member ASs would be a nightmare to manage.
EM
Emerson 1 year ago
↳ replying to Julianna
C) Member ASs within a confederation can use route reflection.
DA
Dawne 1 year ago
↳ replying to Julianna
B) Within a confederation, each member AS is considered as a stand-alone AS.
JU
Juliann 1 year ago
↳ replying to Julianna
A) The entire confederation is viewed as a single AS by an eBGP peer.
MA
Maxima 1 year ago
Hold up, option A is the one that's false, right? The entire confederation being viewed as a single AS by an eBGP peer? That's like saying my family is just one person to the neighbors.
TA
Tamra 1 year ago
I don't know about you, but option C is the one that caught my eye. Route reflection within a confederation? Now that's a party I want to be a part of!
LE
Lezlie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Tamra
C) Member ASs within a confederation can use route reflection.
SH
Sheldon 1 year ago
↳ replying to Tamra
B) Within a confederation, each member AS is considered as a stand-alone AS.
RA
Rasheeda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Tamra
Definitely, it's all about making network management more efficient and less complex.
MI
Micaela 1 year ago
↳ replying to Tamra
I think that's one of the key benefits of using BGP confederations. It makes scaling the network much easier.
TA
Tamie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Tamra
A) The entire confederation is viewed as a single AS by an eBGP peer.
DE
Dean 1 year ago
↳ replying to Tamra
Yeah, it would definitely help reduce the number of BGP peering sessions within the confederation.
BI
Billye 1 year ago
↳ replying to Tamra
I agree, option C does sound interesting. Route reflection within a confederation could definitely simplify things.
SU
Sueann 2 years ago
I'm pretty sure option B is the way to go. Each member AS being a stand-alone AS makes sense, otherwise it wouldn't be a confederation, would it?
KE
Keneth 2 years ago
Hmm, option D seems a bit odd. Fully meshed ASs within a confederation? That's like asking me to be friends with all my cousins - not happening!
GI
Gilma 1 year ago
↳ replying to Keneth
C) Member ASs within a confederation can use route reflection.
JO
Jordan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Keneth
A) The entire confederation is viewed as a single AS by an eBGP peer.
CE
Cecilia 2 years ago
Hmm, I see your point. Let's discuss further to figure out the correct answer.
VA
Vallie 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is A) The entire confederation is viewed as a single AS by an eBGP peer.
CE
Cecilia 2 years ago
I think the answer is D) Member ASs must be fully meshed within a confederation.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel