A BGP router has loopback interfaces 192.168.1.1/27 and 192.168.2.1/27 advertised into BGP using the following export policy. The "aggregate 192.168.0.0/16" command is executed. What is the effect of this configuration?
I think the key here is the 'aggregate 192.168.0.0/16' command. That's going to override the more specific loopback subnets and result in a single 192.168.0.0/16 route being advertised. Option A seems like the clear winner to me.
Haha, I bet the exam writer is trying to trick us with that 'Blackhole' route option. As if BGP would advertise a 'Blackhole' route, that's just silly!
Wait, if the loopback interfaces are advertised, shouldn't the BGP routes for 192.168.1.0/27 and 192.168.2.0/27 also be advertised? I'm not sure about this one.
The 'aggregate 192.168.0.0/16' command will definitely aggregate the two loopback subnets into a single route. So, the correct answer is A) A single route for 192.168.0.0/16 is advertised.
Chau
2 days agoAlex
3 days agoFiliberto
6 days agoCarin
8 days agoRobt
13 days agoSylvie
13 days agoRobt
16 days ago