Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

NFPA CWBSP Exam - Topic 3 Question 26 Discussion

Posted by Derrick on Mar 08, 2026 at 07:39 PM

For an existing antifreeze system without a backflow prevention device, what size hole is required in the check valve separating the supply and the antifreeze?

Suggested Answer: A

If sprinklers are above the level of the water supply to the antifreeze system, a check valve with a 1/32 in. (0.8 mm) hole in the clapper shall be provided in the U-loop.


Get Premium CWBSP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
31 comments · newest first
RE
Rebecka 12 days ago
D) 1/4 in. sounds too big for a check valve.
JO
Josue 17 days ago
I’m leaning towards A) 1/32 in. Less risk of backflow.
BO
Bok 23 days ago
I feel like it could be C) 1/8 in. More flow needed.
TU
Tu 28 days ago
I think it's B) 1/16 in. Seems reasonable for flow.
KR
Kristel 1 month ago
D) 1/4 in. seems excessive. I’d go with B too.
KE
Keneth 1 month ago
A) 1/32 in. is too small for a check valve, right?
UN
Una 1 month ago
I’m leaning towards C) 1/8 in. It feels safer.
NA
Nathalie 2 months ago
I think it's B) 1/16 in. Seems reasonable.
RE
Rene 2 months ago
I just hope I remember the specs!
DE
Deandrea 2 months ago
True, but it needs enough size.
LY
Lynelle 2 months ago
But what if it clogs?
HE
Helaine 2 months ago
C seems reasonable for balance.
DE
Deandrea 2 months ago
I lean towards C) 1/8 in.
RE
Rene 3 months ago
A might be too small for flow.
LY
Lynelle 3 months ago
Why B? Isn't A safer?
RE
Rene 3 months ago
I think it's B) 1/16 in.
HE
Helaine 3 months ago
This question is tricky.
HA
Hailey 3 months ago
Why is there no backflow prevention device in the first place?
BI
Billy 4 months ago
Totally agree, 1/16 in. is the standard!
BR
Brynn 5 months ago
Wait, are we sure about these sizes?
FR
Frank 5 months ago
I thought it was 1/8 in. (3.17 mm).
GR
Gretchen 5 months ago
It's definitely 1/16 in. (1.59 mm).
LI
Lisha 6 months ago
Why is there no backflow prevention device? Seems risky!
MA
Martin 6 months ago
Totally agree with Rebecka!
SH
Shenika 6 months ago
Wait, are we sure about these sizes?
CA
Carlton 6 months ago
I thought it was 1/8 in. (3.17 mm).
RE
Rebecka 6 months ago
It's definitely 1/16 in. (1.59 mm).
CA
Camellia 6 months ago
I have a feeling that 1/4 in. is too large for a check valve in an antifreeze system, but I can't recall the exact reasoning behind it.
EZ
Ezekiel 7 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I recall that 1/32 in. was mentioned as a possible option, but I can't remember if it was for this specific scenario.
ST
Stephanie 7 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like 1/16 in. could be the right answer since it's smaller and might prevent backflow better.
EV
Evangelina 7 months ago
I think the hole size might be 1/8 in. because I remember it being a common size for check valves.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel