Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

NFPA CWBSP Exam - Topic 1 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for NFPA's CWBSP exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 1
[All CWBSP Questions]

A light hazard wet pipe sprinkler system using quick-response sprinklers with a 18 ft (5.58 m) ceiling would be allowed

what percentage area of reduction on the remote area?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

In a light hazard wet pipe system with quick-response sprinklers and a ceiling height of 18 feet, a 0.32 area reduction percentage is commonly allowed for the remote area. This accounts for the lower fire load and risk associated with light hazard occupancies.


by Shannan at Nov 15, 2024, 05:18 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CWBSP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Janessa
6 months ago
Just double-checked, definitely 0.32!
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
6 months ago
I thought it was 0.28, but I guess 0.32 makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alisha
6 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Seems high.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sophia
7 months ago
Totally agree, 0.32 is the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evette
7 months ago
It's 0.32 for quick-response systems!
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
7 months ago
I believe the standard reduction is usually around 0.32, but I might be mixing it up with another type of system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derick
7 months ago
I thought the reduction for quick-response sprinklers was higher, maybe 0.4? That seems like a lot though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristin
7 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I feel like the answer was around 0.26, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katlyn
8 months ago
I think we discussed the percentage area reduction in class, but I can't remember if it was 0.28 or 0.32.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alysa
8 months ago
Alright, time to put my sprinkler system knowledge to the test. Let me review the code details and work through this step-by-step. I think I can figure out the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ayesha
8 months ago
I'm a little unsure about this one. I know the code requirements can be tricky when it comes to sprinkler system design. I'll need to double-check my notes to make sure I'm interpreting this correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franchesca
8 months ago
I've got this! The percentage area reduction for a light hazard system with quick-response sprinklers and an 18 ft ceiling is 0.32, so the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olga
8 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The question is asking about the remote area reduction for a light hazard wet pipe sprinkler system with quick-response sprinklers and an 18 ft ceiling. I'll need to consult the relevant code sections to determine the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
8 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to review the code requirements for quick-response sprinklers and ceiling heights to figure out the right percentage reduction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
1 year ago
Wait, is this a trick question? I mean, who even remembers the exact percentage reduction for this specific scenario? I'm just gonna guess and hope for the best. *laughs nervously*
upvoted 0 times
Nancey
1 year ago
D) 0.4
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
1 year ago
C) 0.32
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
1 year ago
B) 0.28
upvoted 0 times
...
Lea
1 year ago
A) 0.26
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mel
1 year ago
The answer is clearly A) 0.26. Come on, people, this is basic sprinkler system knowledge. *rolls eyes*
upvoted 0 times
Noah
1 year ago
Yes, it's definitely A) 0.26
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
1 year ago
A) 0.26 is the percentage area of reduction on the remote area
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
1 year ago
I agree, A) 0.26 is the correct answer
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
1 year ago
I think it's A) 0.26
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Allene
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think D) 0.4 could also be a possibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mee
2 years ago
I agree with Verlene, quick-response sprinklers are more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'll have to double-check my notes, but I think it's B) 0.28. These questions can be tricky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
2 years ago
Definitely D) 0.4. I remember covering this in my sprinkler system training. The reduction is 40% for this type of setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verlene
2 years ago
I think the answer is C) 0.32.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sang
2 years ago
I think the answer is C) 0.32. That's the percentage reduction for quick-response sprinklers in a light hazard wet pipe system with an 18 ft ceiling.
upvoted 0 times
Eladia
1 year ago
It's important to have the right system in place for safety.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
1 year ago
Always important to understand the specifics of sprinkler systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hassie
1 year ago
Quick-response sprinklers make a big difference in reducing the area.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
1 year ago
Good to know, thanks for clarifying.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
1 year ago
That's correct, it is a 0.32 percentage reduction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
1 year ago
That's correct, it is the percentage reduction for quick-response sprinklers in that system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
1 year ago
I agree, the answer is C) 0.32.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
2 years ago
I agree, the answer is C) 0.32.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel