Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

NFPA Exam CWBSP Topic 1 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for NFPA's CWBSP exam
Question #: 11
Topic #: 1
[All CWBSP Questions]

A kitchen in a restaurant encompasses an area of just over 700 ft2 (65 m2) with 2-hour fire rated walls. Does this meet the definition of a small room?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

A kitchen area of over 700 ft in a restaurant typically does not meet the definition of a 'small room' in fire protection terminology, as it exceeds common size thresholds for such a classification, which often consider both the area and the specific use or hazard of the space.


by Billye at Mar 09, 2025, 06:50 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CWBSP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Cherrie
2 months ago
Hold up, are we sure the question isn't asking about the optimal size of the chef's hat? Because that's the real burning issue here.
upvoted 0 times
Elfriede
8 days ago
C) Yes, as the walls are 1-hour fire rated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olive
12 days ago
B) No, 700 ft2 (65 m2) is too large.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kara
24 days ago
A) Yes, as the limit is 800 ft2 (74 m2).
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cecil
2 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm gonna go with B, just because 700 ft2 sounds pretty big for a 'small' room.
upvoted 0 times
...
Milly
2 months ago
D makes the most sense to me. Small rooms are for light hazard occupancy, and a restaurant kitchen is not that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
2 months ago
I'm going with C. As long as the walls are fire rated, the size doesn't matter, right? Wait, did I read that wrong?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephania
2 months ago
D) No, small rooms are only of light hazard occupancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
2 months ago
B is the correct answer. 700 ft2 is too large to be considered a small room, even with 2-hour fire rated walls.
upvoted 0 times
Mariann
27 days ago
C) Yes, as the walls are 1-hour fire rated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
28 days ago
B is the correct answer. 700 ft2 is too large to be considered a small room, even with 2-hour fire rated walls.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wei
1 months ago
A) Yes, as the limit is 800 ft2 (74 m2).
upvoted 0 times
...
Xuan
1 months ago
C) Yes, as the walls are 1-hour fire rated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larae
1 months ago
B) No, 700 ft2 (65 m2) is too large.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dell
2 months ago
A) Yes, as the limit is 800 ft2 (74 m2).
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Adelaide
2 months ago
C) Yes, as the walls are 1-hour fire rated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
3 months ago
B) No, 700 ft2 (65 m2) is too large.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
3 months ago
A) Yes, as the limit is 800 ft2 (74 m2).
upvoted 0 times
...
Colene
3 months ago
I think the answer is A. The limit for a small room is 800 ft2, and this kitchen is just over 700 ft2, so it meets the definition.
upvoted 0 times
Ellsworth
2 months ago
I agree, the kitchen meets the definition of a small room.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aron
2 months ago
A) Yes, as the limit is 800 ft2 (74 m2).
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel