Option C, for sure. I mean, who doesn't love a good price check? It's like a superpower for the modern-day accountant. 'Excuse me, can you price-check that for me in Subsidiary B?' *mic drop*
I'm going with B. It just makes sense that if I can view records from other subsidiaries, I should be able to update them as well. Anything less would be a waste of my time.
D seems like the right answer to me. If I can view records from other subsidiaries, I should be able to submit expenses against their customers too. Seems like the logical extension of the feature.
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I mean, if I can view records from other subsidiaries, why can't I update them? Seems like a half-baked feature if you ask me.
I think option C is the correct answer. Allowing cross-subsidiary record viewing means users can check prices on Sales Orders from other subsidiaries, but not necessarily transact in those subsidiaries or update customer addresses.
Laquanda
18 days agoVallie
24 days agoKarol
18 days agoRyan
1 months agoMiesha
1 days agoLynelle
8 days agoJonell
16 days agoJamika
2 months agoDorothy
19 days agoRyann
1 months agoGregg
2 months agoGlenn
2 months agoTalia
2 months agoJutta
2 months agoWeldon
4 days agoRossana
26 days agoVi
1 months agoXochitl
1 months ago