Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Netskope Exam NSK300 Topic 6 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for Netskope's NSK300 exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 6
[All NSK300 Questions]

You deployed Netskope Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) using pre-defined benchmark rules to monitor your cloud posture in AWS, Azure, and GCP. You are asked to assess if you can extend the Netskope CSPM solution by creating custom rules for each environment.

Which statement is correct?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The issue is likely caused by a missing group name in the SAML response (A). When access to Microsoft 365 from unmanaged devices is not blocked as expected, despite having a policy in place, it often indicates that the SAML assertion is not correctly identifying the user as a member of the restricted group. In this case, the ''marketing-users'' group name should be present in the SAML response to enforce the policy that blocks login activity for this group. If the group name is missing, the policy will not apply, and users will not be blocked as intended.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Sylvie
3 hours ago
Hmm, I'm not too sure about this one. I'd probably go with option C, just to be on the safe side. Can't go wrong with AWS and Azure, but GCP might be a bit trickier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
1 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think B could also be a possibility since it mentions aligning rules with Google Workspace.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaleesa
3 days ago
I agree with Verda, D makes sense because it allows custom rules for all cloud environments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lachelle
9 days ago
Ooh, this is a tricky one! I think I'll go with option D - custom rules for all three cloud providers. Netskope's got to be pretty powerful to handle that, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Verda
16 days ago
I think the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel