Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Netskope Exam NSK300 Topic 5 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for Netskope's NSK300 exam
Question #: 27
Topic #: 5
[All NSK300 Questions]

Contribute your Thoughts:

An
22 days ago
Alright, time to put my incident response skills to the test. I'm pretty confident that B is the correct answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anjelica
1 months ago
Ha! If the malware hash was added as an IOC in Netskope, that would be like trying to catch a fish with a net made of holes. Gotta go with B on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Clement
2 days ago
Definitely, quarantining the malware could also be a good option to prevent further damage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anisha
3 days ago
Yeah, isolating the endpoint might not be as effective as adding the hash as an IOC in Crowdstrike.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
20 days ago
I agree, adding the malware hash as an IOC in Crowdstrike seems like the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leslee
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too sure about this one. Isolating the endpoint or quarantining the malware would also make sense. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
2 months ago
Okay, this seems pretty straightforward. The remediation profile is adding the malware hash as an IOC in Crowdstrike, so the answer must be B.
upvoted 0 times
Natalie
19 days ago
Yes, that's correct. It's a simple integration with Crowdstrike EDR.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mayra
20 days ago
I agree, the answer is B. It will add the malware hash as an IOC in Crowdstrike.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Natalie
2 months ago
Adding the malware hash as an IOC in Crowdstrike could also be a possibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edwin
2 months ago
I believe the malware will be quarantined.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
2 months ago
I think the action will be to isolate the endpoint.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel