Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Netskope NSK300 Exam - Topic 5 Question 27 Discussion

Review the exhibit.You are asked to integrate Netskope with Crowdstrike EDR. You added the Remediation profile shown in the exhibit.Which action will this remediation profile take?
B) The malware hash will be added as an IOC in Crowdstrike.
A) The endpoint will be isolated.
C) The malware will be quarantined.
D) The malware hash will be added as an IOC in Netskope.

Netskope NSK300 Exam - Topic 5 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for Netskope's NSK300 exam
Question #: 27
Topic #: 5
[All NSK300 Questions]

Review the exhibit.

You are asked to integrate Netskope with Crowdstrike EDR. You added the Remediation profile shown in the exhibit.

Which action will this remediation profile take?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

To solve the problem of normal websites not rendering properly due to a Real-time Protection policy that blocks all activities to non-corporate S3 buckets, the best solution is tocreate a Real-time Protection policy to allow the Browse activity to the Cloud Storage category. This approach will enable users to view content from various cloud storage services, including Amazon S3, without allowing full access to non-corporate S3 buckets.It's a more granular and less restrictive policy that allows necessary browsing activities while still maintaining control over the upload and download activities to non-corporate buckets1.


by Raymon at Feb 10, 2025, 01:17 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NSK300 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Alisha
7 months ago
Adding the hash as an IOC in Crowdstrike sounds right too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
8 months ago
I think the malware will be quarantined instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
8 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
8 months ago
Totally agree with that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Eileen
8 months ago
The endpoint will be isolated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
9 months ago
I feel like the answer has to do with adding the malware hash as an IOC, but I can't remember if it's specifically for Crowdstrike or Netskope.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnathon
9 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the options. Is the endpoint isolation really the same as quarantining the malware? They seem related but different.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deonna
9 months ago
I remember a similar question where we had to choose between adding an IOC in Crowdstrike or Netskope. I feel like this one is leaning towards Crowdstrike too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vinnie
9 months ago
I think the remediation profile might isolate the endpoint, but I'm not entirely sure. It could also be about quarantining the malware.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isabelle
9 months ago
Ah, I see the key information in the exhibit. I'm confident I can choose the right answer for this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marica
9 months ago
This seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I'm not missing any important details before selecting my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hillary
9 months ago
I think I know the answer, but I want to double-check the information in the exhibit to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
9 months ago
Okay, the question is asking about the action this remediation profile will take. Let me think through the options...
upvoted 0 times
...
Merlyn
9 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the remediation profile details to determine the correct action.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
1 year ago
Alright, time to put my incident response skills to the test. I'm pretty confident that B is the correct answer here.
upvoted 0 times
Lavera
1 year ago
User1: Let's go with option B then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerardo
1 year ago
User2: Agreed, adding the malware hash as an IOC in Crowdstrike makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chan
1 year ago
User1: I think B is the correct answer too.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Anjelica
1 year ago
Ha! If the malware hash was added as an IOC in Netskope, that would be like trying to catch a fish with a net made of holes. Gotta go with B on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Nicholle
1 year ago
Definitely, quarantining the malware seems like the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
1 year ago
Yeah, isolating the endpoint wouldn't really solve the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noemi
1 year ago
I agree, adding the malware hash as an IOC in Crowdstrike makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clement
1 year ago
Definitely, quarantining the malware could also be a good option to prevent further damage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anisha
1 year ago
Yeah, isolating the endpoint might not be as effective as adding the hash as an IOC in Crowdstrike.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
1 year ago
I agree, adding the malware hash as an IOC in Crowdstrike seems like the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leslee
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not too sure about this one. Isolating the endpoint or quarantining the malware would also make sense. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
1 year ago
Okay, this seems pretty straightforward. The remediation profile is adding the malware hash as an IOC in Crowdstrike, so the answer must be B.
upvoted 0 times
Natalie
1 year ago
Yes, that's correct. It's a simple integration with Crowdstrike EDR.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mayra
1 year ago
I agree, the answer is B. It will add the malware hash as an IOC in Crowdstrike.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Natalie
1 year ago
Adding the malware hash as an IOC in Crowdstrike could also be a possibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edwin
1 year ago
I believe the malware will be quarantined.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
1 year ago
I think the action will be to isolate the endpoint.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel