Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

NetApp NS0-527 Exam - Topic 6 Question 83 Discussion

Your customer wants to implement a solution to protect only a select number of NFSv3 volumes in a particular aggregate that stores their mission-critical application data. The customer wants the volume's data replicated to secondary storage and have application write operations fail if they cannot be replicated. The customer needs to maintain a zero RPO and a very low RTO.In this scenario, which solution satisfies these requirements?
B) Mirrored aggregates using SyncMirror
A) SnapMirror Synchronous using Sync mode
C) SnapMirror Synchronous using StrictSync mode
D) Mirrored SVMs using MetroCluster

NetApp NS0-527 Exam - Topic 6 Question 83 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-527 exam
Question #: 83
Topic #: 6
[All NS0-527 Questions]

Your customer wants to implement a solution to protect only a select number of NFSv3 volumes in a particular aggregate that stores their mission-critical application dat

a. The customer wants the volume's data replicated to secondary storage and have application write operations fail if they cannot be replicated. The customer needs to maintain a zero RPO and a very low RTO.

In this scenario, which solution satisfies these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Enola
2 days ago
I prefer C. StrictSync ensures no data loss.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
7 days ago
I think A is the best choice. Zero RPO is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
12 days ago
D) MetroCluster seems too complex for just a few volumes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karima
17 days ago
B) Mirrored aggregates could work too, but not ideal for RPO.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ailene
2 months ago
Wait, isn't StrictSync mode overkill for this?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
2 months ago
I agree, that meets the zero RPO requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
2 months ago
A) SnapMirror Synchronous using Sync mode is the best fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patti
3 months ago
Zero RPO and low RTO? Can we really achieve that with any of these?
upvoted 0 times
...
Keshia
3 months ago
D) Mirrored SVMs using MetroCluster sounds like a solid option!
upvoted 0 times
...
Janessa
3 months ago
Wait, isn't C) SnapMirror Synchronous using StrictSync mode overkill?
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
3 months ago
I think B) Mirrored aggregates using SyncMirror could work too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
3 months ago
A) SnapMirror Synchronous using Sync mode is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawn
3 months ago
I’m leaning towards SnapMirror Synchronous using StrictSync mode since it emphasizes strict replication, but I need to double-check the definitions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
4 months ago
I feel like we had a practice question about MetroCluster and its benefits for mission-critical apps, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicente
4 months ago
I think Mirrored aggregates with SyncMirror could be a good choice, but I’m not entirely clear on how it handles application write operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
4 months ago
I remember we discussed SnapMirror Synchronous in class, but I'm not sure if Sync or StrictSync is the better option for zero RPO.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel