Your customer wants to implement a solution to protect only a select number of NFSv3 volumes in a particular aggregate that stores their mission-critical application dat
a. The customer wants the volume's data replicated to secondary storage and have application write operations fail if they cannot be replicated. The customer needs to maintain a zero RPO and a very low RTO.
In this scenario, which solution satisfies these requirements?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium NS0-527 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
26 comments · newest first
MO
Mohammad
1 month ago
B is solid, but not as efficient for this case.
ZO
Zoila
1 month ago
D could work too, but it's more complex.
SK
Skye
2 months ago
I prefer C. StrictSync ensures data consistency.
GR
Gretchen
2 months ago
I think A is the best choice. Zero RPO is crucial.
NG
Ngoc
2 months ago
B is solid for mirrored aggregates, but not as fast.
LA
Lawana
2 months ago
D could work, but it's more complex.
DE
Desmond
2 months ago
I prefer C. StrictSync ensures no data loss.
TR
Trinidad
3 months ago
I think A is the best choice. Zero RPO is crucial.
GL
Glory
3 months ago
D is interesting, but might be overkill for just a few volumes.
DE
Delfina
3 months ago
B could work, but not as effective for RPO.
EN
Enola
3 months ago
I prefer C. StrictSync ensures no data loss.
AN
An
3 months ago
I think A is the best choice. Zero RPO is crucial.
KE
Keneth
3 months ago
D) MetroCluster seems too complex for just a few volumes.
KA
Karima
4 months ago
B) Mirrored aggregates could work too, but not ideal for RPO.
AI
Ailene
5 months ago
Wait, isn't StrictSync mode overkill for this?
TE
Tegan
5 months ago
I agree, that meets the zero RPO requirement.
WI
Willard
5 months ago
A) SnapMirror Synchronous using Sync mode is the best fit.
PA
Patti
6 months ago
Zero RPO and low RTO? Can we really achieve that with any of these?
KE
Keshia
6 months ago
D) Mirrored SVMs using MetroCluster sounds like a solid option!
JA
Janessa
6 months ago
Wait, isn't C) SnapMirror Synchronous using StrictSync mode overkill?
ME
Melodie
6 months ago
I think B) Mirrored aggregates using SyncMirror could work too.
BI
Billy
6 months ago
A) SnapMirror Synchronous using Sync mode is the best choice.
SH
Shawn
6 months ago
I’m leaning towards SnapMirror Synchronous using StrictSync mode since it emphasizes strict replication, but I need to double-check the definitions.
JO
Joseph
7 months ago
I feel like we had a practice question about MetroCluster and its benefits for mission-critical apps, but I can't recall the specifics.
VI
Vicente
7 months ago
I think Mirrored aggregates with SyncMirror could be a good choice, but I’m not entirely clear on how it handles application write operations.
AL
Aliza
7 months ago
I remember we discussed SnapMirror Synchronous in class, but I'm not sure if Sync or StrictSync is the better option for zero RPO.