MENU
You are asked to implement a DR solution to protect employee home directories on the primary cluster. The solution should provide an PRO of one hour, disaster recovery and archiving configured on the same destination volume of the DR cluster. Your solution should also reduce the amount of secondary storage requirements and use lower network traffic on the WAN links.
In this scenario, which NetApp replication technology satisfies these requirements?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium NS0-527 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
20 comments · newest first
KA
Karina
9 months ago
SnapMirror is definitely the way to go for reducing storage needs.
FA
Fanny
10 months ago
Wait, can SnapMirror really handle all those requirements?
BO
Boris
10 months ago
I'm pretty sure SnapMirror-Sync is the right choice here.
JO
Jose
10 months ago
I disagree, SyncMirror might be better for this scenario.
OD
Odette
10 months ago
MetroCluster sounds like overkill for just home directories.
JE
Jerlene
11 months ago
I'm leaning towards SnapMirror for its efficiency, but I need to double-check if it meets the one-hour RPO requirement.
AI
Aimee
11 months ago
MetroCluster sounds familiar, but I don't recall it being specifically for DR solutions with low WAN traffic.
TO
Tommy
11 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I think SyncMirror could be a contender, but it might not handle the archiving as well as SnapMirror.
MI
Ming
11 months ago
I think SnapMirror-Sync might be the right choice since it offers real-time replication, but I'm not entirely sure about the archiving part.
AN
Anjelica
12 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards SnapMirror, but I want to make sure it can reduce the secondary storage requirements and network traffic as specified. I'll need to research the capabilities of each option more thoroughly.
MA
Marya
12 months ago
I'm not too familiar with the different NetApp replication technologies, so I'll need to review the details of each option carefully. The key is to make sure the solution meets all the stated requirements.
ER
Erinn
12 months ago
SnapMirror seems like the obvious choice to me. It's a well-established NetApp technology that can handle the disaster recovery and archiving requirements. I'm confident I can implement this solution correctly.
SE
Selene
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the requirements. Does SnapMirror-Sync also meet the criteria for reduced secondary storage and lower network traffic? I'll need to double-check the capabilities of each option.
BL
Blondell
1 year ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward question. I think SnapMirror is the best option here since it provides the required RPO and can handle both disaster recovery and archiving on the same destination volume.
JO
Johnetta
1 year ago
I'm not too sure about this one. SnapMirror-Sync sounds like the closest match, but I'm worried about the network traffic on the WAN links. Maybe we should look into MetroCluster instead?
PR
Precious
1 year ago
SnapMirror, for sure! It ticks all the boxes - RPO, DR, archiving, reduced storage, and low WAN traffic. Definitely the way to go.
SH
Shayne
9 months ago
Low WAN traffic is a huge plus for SnapMirror!
HO
Hollis
9 months ago
SnapMirror really does minimize storage needs too.
PA
Page
9 months ago
Absolutely, it meets all the requirements perfectly.
FE
Fernanda
10 months ago
I agree, SnapMirror is the best choice!