Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

NetApp NS0-527 Exam - Topic 1 Question 79 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-527 exam

Question #: 79
Topic #: 1

[All NS0-527 Questions]

When you configure a SnapLock feature, where should the ComplianceClock be initialized?

Aon each aggregate that hosts a SnapLock volume

Bon each SVM that hosts a SnapLock volume

Con each node that hosts a SnapLock aggregate

Don all the nodes of the cluster

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Van at Nov 25, 2025, 01:53 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-527 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Torie

3 months ago

I agree with B. SVMs are key for SnapLock management.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rebecka

3 months ago

D is too broad. Not all nodes need it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jina

4 months ago

C seems logical. Nodes control aggregates directly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Verlene

4 months ago

I feel B makes sense. SVMs manage volumes, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Madalyn

4 months ago

I think it should be A. Each aggregate needs its own ComplianceClock.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nadine

5 months ago

I agree, SVMs make the most sense for compliance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Walker

5 months ago

Wait, all nodes of the cluster? That seems excessive!

upvoted 0 times

...

Alease

5 months ago

Option C is the way to go. Initializing it on each node that hosts a SnapLock aggregate ensures consistency across the cluster.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maurine

5 months ago

Haha, I bet the ComplianceClock is just a fancy name for a digital clock that keeps track of compliance. Why make it so complicated?

upvoted 0 times

...

Lavelle

5 months ago

Option D seems like overkill. Initializing the ComplianceClock on all the nodes of the cluster is just unnecessary complexity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shenika

5 months ago

I think the ComplianceClock should be initialized on each SVM that hosts a SnapLock volume. That makes the most sense to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Toshia

6 months ago

I believe it’s on each node that hosts a SnapLock aggregate, but I need to double-check my notes to be certain.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adolph

6 months ago

I’m a bit confused about this one. I thought it was supposed to be on all the nodes of the cluster, but I could be mixing it up with another topic.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marylin

6 months ago

I remember practicing a similar question, and I feel like it might be on each SVM that hosts a SnapLock volume.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristeen

6 months ago

I'm pretty confident that the ComplianceClock needs to be initialized at the SVM level, since that's where the SnapLock volumes are managed. The other options don't seem to make as much sense to me. I'll go with B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leanna

6 months ago

Okay, I think I've got it. The ComplianceClock is a feature of the SnapLock volume, so it makes sense that it would be initialized at the SVM level, where the SnapLock volumes are hosted. I'm going with option B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bobbie

6 months ago

Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards option D, initializing the ComplianceClock on all the nodes of the cluster, just to be safe and ensure consistency across the entire system. But I'm not 100% sure about that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lettie

7 months ago

Definitely on each node that hosts a SnapLock aggregate, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Martin

7 months ago

I think the ComplianceClock should be initialized on each aggregate that hosts a SnapLock volume, but I'm not entirely sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Charolette

7 months ago

It should be initialized on each SVM that hosts a SnapLock volume.

upvoted 0 times

...

Quentin

7 months ago

A is the best choice. Compliance is per aggregate.

upvoted 0 times

...

Edda

8 months ago

I thought it was on each aggregate, not SVMs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bok

8 months ago

I'm a bit confused on this one. Is the ComplianceClock something that needs to be set up at the node level, or is it more of a volume-level setting? I'm not sure if I should be looking at the nodes, the aggregates, or the SVMs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristine

8 months ago

I think the ComplianceClock should be initialized on each SVM that hosts a SnapLock volume, so option B is the correct answer.

upvoted 0 times

Carolann

2 months ago

Definitely B, it aligns with best practices.

upvoted 0 times

...

Heidy

3 months ago

Option C could work too, but B is safer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jamey

3 months ago

I was leaning towards option A, but B is solid.

upvoted 0 times

...

Armanda

3 months ago

Yeah, initializing on each SVM seems logical.

upvoted 0 times

...

Josue

3 months ago

I agree with you, option B makes the most sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

...