New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

NetApp NS0-527 Exam - Topic 1 Question 79 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-527 exam
Question #: 79
Topic #: 1
[All NS0-527 Questions]

When you configure a SnapLock feature, where should the ComplianceClock be initialized?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Van at Nov 25, 2025, 01:53 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-527 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Nadine
1 day ago
I agree, SVMs make the most sense for compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Walker
6 days ago
Wait, all nodes of the cluster? That seems excessive!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
12 days ago
Option C is the way to go. Initializing it on each node that hosts a SnapLock aggregate ensures consistency across the cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maurine
17 days ago
Haha, I bet the ComplianceClock is just a fancy name for a digital clock that keeps track of compliance. Why make it so complicated?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavelle
22 days ago
Option D seems like overkill. Initializing the ComplianceClock on all the nodes of the cluster is just unnecessary complexity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
27 days ago
I think the ComplianceClock should be initialized on each SVM that hosts a SnapLock volume. That makes the most sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Toshia
1 month ago
I believe it’s on each node that hosts a SnapLock aggregate, but I need to double-check my notes to be certain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
1 month ago
I’m a bit confused about this one. I thought it was supposed to be on all the nodes of the cluster, but I could be mixing it up with another topic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylin
1 month ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I feel like it might be on each SVM that hosts a SnapLock volume.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristeen
2 months ago
I'm pretty confident that the ComplianceClock needs to be initialized at the SVM level, since that's where the SnapLock volumes are managed. The other options don't seem to make as much sense to me. I'll go with B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leanna
2 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The ComplianceClock is a feature of the SnapLock volume, so it makes sense that it would be initialized at the SVM level, where the SnapLock volumes are hosted. I'm going with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbie
2 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards option D, initializing the ComplianceClock on all the nodes of the cluster, just to be safe and ensure consistency across the entire system. But I'm not 100% sure about that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
2 months ago
Definitely on each node that hosts a SnapLock aggregate, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Martin
2 months ago
I think the ComplianceClock should be initialized on each aggregate that hosts a SnapLock volume, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charolette
2 months ago
It should be initialized on each SVM that hosts a SnapLock volume.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
3 months ago
A is the best choice. Compliance is per aggregate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edda
3 months ago
I thought it was on each aggregate, not SVMs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
3 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. Is the ComplianceClock something that needs to be set up at the node level, or is it more of a volume-level setting? I'm not sure if I should be looking at the nodes, the aggregates, or the SVMs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristine
3 months ago
I think the ComplianceClock should be initialized on each SVM that hosts a SnapLock volume, so option B is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel