New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

NetApp NS0-527 Exam - Topic 1 Question 64 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-527 exam
Question #: 64
Topic #: 1
[All NS0-527 Questions]

Your backup cluster reached both the maximum number of parallel replication transfers and the maximum number of FlexVol volumes per node. You need to increase these maximum numbers.

In this scenario, which license you would install on the destination to accomplish this task?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Eun at Nov 17, 2024, 06:57 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-527 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Galen
3 months ago
Yup, definitely SnapMirror Sync License!
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? I thought it was the Data Protection Optimized License.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noe
3 months ago
I thought SnapVault was for backups, not replication?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nathan
4 months ago
Totally agree, SnapMirror Sync is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Linwood
4 months ago
You need the SnapMirror Sync License for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chery
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards the SnapRestore License, but I remember there being some confusion about which license does what in our last review session.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
4 months ago
I feel like the SnapVault License might be relevant here, but it seems more focused on backup rather than replication limits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
4 months ago
I remember practicing a question about SnapMirror Sync before, but I can't recall if it was related to increasing replication transfers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
5 months ago
I think we might need the Data Protection Optimized License for increasing those limits, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. I'll need to review the details of each license option to make sure I select the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beatriz
5 months ago
I've got a good feeling about the SnapMirror Sync License. That sounds like the license that would allow me to increase those maximum numbers on the destination cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annabelle
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I know the SnapRestore License is for restoring data, but I'm not sure if that's the right choice for this scenario. Maybe the Data Protection Optimized License could work?
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. The question is asking about increasing the maximum numbers for parallel replication transfers and FlexVol volumes per node. I'm pretty sure the SnapMirror Sync License is the right answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Toshia
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the different license options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
9 months ago
I'm going to have to go with C) Data Protection Optimized License. It just makes the most sense for this scenario. Although, I can't help but think the person who wrote this question was having a little too much fun with all these 'Snap' licenses.
upvoted 0 times
Cherelle
8 months ago
Definitely, C) Data Protection Optimized License is the way to go for increasing those maximum numbers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nohemi
8 months ago
I would go with C) Data Protection Optimized License as well. It fits the scenario perfectly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
9 months ago
Yeah, I think so too. It's all about optimizing data protection in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thea
9 months ago
I agree, C) Data Protection Optimized License seems like the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dick
10 months ago
I'm going with C) Data Protection Optimized License. Sounds like the most appropriate solution to me. Although, I do have to wonder, who comes up with these license names? SnapVault? SnapMirror? It's like they're trying to confuse us!
upvoted 0 times
Hyman
8 months ago
Yeah, the names can be confusing, but as long as it gets the job done, that's what matters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
9 months ago
I agree, it seems like the most appropriate license for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
9 months ago
I think C) Data Protection Optimized License is the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sheridan
10 months ago
C) Data Protection Optimized License is definitely the way to go. Who even uses SnapRestore these days? That's so 2010.
upvoted 0 times
Lou
9 months ago
Data Protection Optimized License will definitely help with increasing the maximum numbers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
9 months ago
Yeah, SnapRestore seems outdated compared to the other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrie
10 months ago
I agree, Data Protection Optimized License is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Daren
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I was thinking B) SnapMirror Sync License, but after re-reading the question, I'm not too confident. Data protection seems like the right focus here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
10 months ago
I think the correct answer is C) Data Protection Optimized License. This license should allow me to increase the maximum numbers for parallel replication transfers and FlexVol volumes per node.
upvoted 0 times
Wenona
8 months ago
Let's go with A) SnapRestore License to increase the maximum numbers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marva
8 months ago
I believe SnapVault License could also help in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martina
9 months ago
I think SnapMirror Sync License might also be a good option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
9 months ago
I agree, C) Data Protection Optimized License should be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gerald
10 months ago
That makes sense, SnapMirror Sync License is specifically designed for data replication and protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verda
11 months ago
I would go with SnapMirror Sync License to accomplish this task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
11 months ago
I think we need to increase the maximum numbers for parallel replication transfers and FlexVol volumes.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel