Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

NetApp Exam NS0-521 Topic 7 Question 10 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-521 exam
Question #: 10
Topic #: 7
[All NS0-521 Questions]

An administrator configured an SVM with LUNs with two WWPNs per node. The administrator accidentally created a WWPN on node1 that needs to move to node2. The SAN hosts use ALUA.

Based on this requirement, what must be taken offline to correct the situation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

To move a WWPN from node1 to node2 in a NetApp ONTAP SAN environment where ALUA is used, you must take the Logical Interface (LIF) offline. Modifying LIFs involves changing their assignment between nodes, which requires them to be temporarily offline. This ensures that the path states are correctly updated without causing disruption to the SAN hosts.

For more details, see:

NetApp Community on Moving LIFs

NetApp Documentation on SAN LIFs


by Cammy at Sep 15, 2024, 07:10 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-521 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Dianne
10 months ago
B) LUN is the way to go. Hopefully, the admin doesn't mix up the WWPN again - that would be a real clown show!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mee
10 months ago
But wouldn't taking the SVM offline also be a possible solution to correct the situation?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kent
10 months ago
I agree with Nan, moving the WWPN to node2 would require taking the LUN offline.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albert
10 months ago
I'll go with B) LUN as well. Can't believe the admin made that mistake, but at least it's an easy fix.
upvoted 0 times
Micheal
9 months ago
User3: Yeah, the admin just needs to fix that mistake with the LUN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
9 months ago
Agreed, the LUN is the one that needs to be moved to node2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salina
10 months ago
I think we need to take the LUN offline to correct the situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Altha
10 months ago
Hmm, B) LUN sounds right. Doesn't make sense to take the whole SVM or volume offline just to fix a WWPN on one node.
upvoted 0 times
Yan
9 months ago
D) Volume
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
10 months ago
C) SVM
upvoted 0 times
...
Michel
10 months ago
B) LUN
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
10 months ago
A) LIF
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nan
11 months ago
I think the LUN needs to be taken offline to correct the situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shalon
11 months ago
I think the correct answer is B) LUN. We need to take the affected LUN offline to correct the WWPN issue without disrupting the entire SVM or other volumes.
upvoted 0 times
Eloisa
10 months ago
Let's go with option B) LUN then to correct the situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawna
10 months ago
No, taking the LUN offline is the correct choice to avoid disrupting the entire SVM.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
10 months ago
But wouldn't taking the LIF offline be a better option?
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
10 months ago
I agree, we should take the LUN offline to fix the WWPN issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel