Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

NetApp NS0-194 Exam - Topic 9 Question 36 Discussion

You have an AFF platform and want to use object storage to provide a cloud-based capacity tier.In this scenario, which NetApp technology would you use to accomplish this task?
C) NetApp HCI
A) FabricPool
B) Flash Pool
D) FlashCache

NetApp NS0-194 Exam - Topic 9 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-194 exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 9
[All NS0-194 Questions]

You have an AFF platform and want to use object storage to provide a cloud-based capacity tier.

In this scenario, which NetApp technology would you use to accomplish this task?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Clay at Sep 21, 2022, 02:57 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-194 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Fabiola
8 months ago
I’m surprised FabricPool is the answer, I thought it was more complex!
upvoted 0 times
...
Golda
8 months ago
Wait, is FlashCache really not an option here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
9 months ago
FabricPool is the right choice, no doubt!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marnie
9 months ago
I thought Flash Pool was the way to go?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dwight
9 months ago
Definitely FabricPool for that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
9 months ago
FlashCache sounds familiar, but I don't think it relates to cloud storage like FabricPool does.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
9 months ago
I feel like I've seen a question about this before, and FabricPool was definitely mentioned as a solution for capacity tiering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
9 months ago
I remember studying Flash Pool for performance optimization, but I don't think it applies here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erin
9 months ago
I think it's FabricPool since it specifically deals with cloud-based storage tiers, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gene
9 months ago
Wait, do I really need to inform other banks in the area about the asset freeze? That doesn't seem like a required step. I'll double-check the question and options to make sure I'm not missing anything important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashunda
10 months ago
Option C seems straightforward - receivables transactions can't be changed after they're printed. That's a good one to mark down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alberto
1 year ago
I heard FabricPool can also tier data to the cloud. That's like, double the cloud power! I'm sold.
upvoted 0 times
Irma
1 year ago
User 4: Double the cloud power with FabricPool, sounds like a win-win!
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
1 year ago
User 3: I agree, FabricPool is the best choice for using object storage on an AFF platform.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, FabricPool can tier data to the cloud, it's pretty powerful.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
1 year ago
User 1: FabricPool is the way to go for cloud-based capacity tier.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Han
1 year ago
Flash Pool? Really? That's so last decade. If you want to impress your boss, you gotta go with FabricPool. It's the cool kid on the block these days.
upvoted 0 times
Gretchen
1 year ago
Flash Pool may be old school, but FabricPool is the way of the future.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
1 year ago
I agree, FabricPool is the latest and greatest technology for that task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desire
1 year ago
FabricPool is definitely the way to go for cloud-based capacity tier.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Azzie
1 year ago
NetApp HCI? Are you kidding me? That's like using a nuclear missile to swat a fly. I think I'll go with the simpler, more elegant solution - FabricPool.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
1 year ago
I'm a bit skeptical about this whole 'object storage' thing. Isn't that just for cat pictures and memes? I'll stick with good old-fashioned FlashCache, thank you very much!
upvoted 0 times
Lisha
1 year ago
I agree, let's stick with what works for us.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelo
1 year ago
FlashCache is reliable and proven. No need to complicate things with object storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emelda
1 year ago
I prefer FlashCache too. Object storage seems unnecessary for our needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberely
1 year ago
D) FlashCache
upvoted 0 times
...
Justa
1 year ago
C) NetApp HCI
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
1 year ago
B) Flash Pool
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquita
1 year ago
A) FabricPool
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carman
1 year ago
FabricPool is the obvious choice here. It's designed to automatically tier data between the high-performance flash tier and the low-cost object storage tier. Easy peasy!
upvoted 0 times
Curtis
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, FabricPool makes it easy to tier data between flash and object storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dyan
1 year ago
User 1: FabricPool is definitely the way to go for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Emilio
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) NetApp HCI could also be a potential option for this task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
1 year ago
I agree with Buddy, FabricPool is the right choice for using object storage as a cloud-based capacity tier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buddy
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) FabricPool because it allows you to tier data to object storage.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel