MENU
You have an AFF platform and want to use object storage to provide a cloud-based capacity tier.
In this scenario, which NetApp technology would you use to accomplish this task?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium NS0-194 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
35 comments · newest first
FA
Fabiola
11 months ago
I’m surprised FabricPool is the answer, I thought it was more complex!
GO
Golda
11 months ago
Wait, is FlashCache really not an option here?
LU
Luis
12 months ago
FabricPool is the right choice, no doubt!
MA
Marnie
12 months ago
I thought Flash Pool was the way to go?
DW
Dwight
12 months ago
Definitely FabricPool for that!
LE
Leota
1 year ago
FlashCache sounds familiar, but I don't think it relates to cloud storage like FabricPool does.
KA
Karan
1 year ago
I feel like I've seen a question about this before, and FabricPool was definitely mentioned as a solution for capacity tiering.
RO
Royal
1 year ago
I remember studying Flash Pool for performance optimization, but I don't think it applies here.
ER
Erin
1 year ago
I think it's FabricPool since it specifically deals with cloud-based storage tiers, but I'm not entirely sure.
GE
Gene
1 year ago
Wait, do I really need to inform other banks in the area about the asset freeze? That doesn't seem like a required step. I'll double-check the question and options to make sure I'm not missing anything important.
LA
Lashunda
1 year ago
Option C seems straightforward - receivables transactions can't be changed after they're printed. That's a good one to mark down.
AL
Alberto
1 year ago
I heard FabricPool can also tier data to the cloud. That's like, double the cloud power! I'm sold.
IR
Irma
1 year ago
User 4: Double the cloud power with FabricPool, sounds like a win-win!
WY
Wynell
1 year ago
User 3: I agree, FabricPool is the best choice for using object storage on an AFF platform.
GE
German
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, FabricPool can tier data to the cloud, it's pretty powerful.
LI
Lizette
1 year ago
User 1: FabricPool is the way to go for cloud-based capacity tier.
HA
Han
1 year ago
Flash Pool? Really? That's so last decade. If you want to impress your boss, you gotta go with FabricPool. It's the cool kid on the block these days.
GR
Gretchen
1 year ago
Flash Pool may be old school, but FabricPool is the way of the future.
KR
Kristel
1 year ago
I agree, FabricPool is the latest and greatest technology for that task.
DE
Desire
1 year ago
FabricPool is definitely the way to go for cloud-based capacity tier.
AZ
Azzie
1 year ago
NetApp HCI? Are you kidding me? That's like using a nuclear missile to swat a fly. I think I'll go with the simpler, more elegant solution - FabricPool.
RE
Ressie
1 year ago
I'm a bit skeptical about this whole 'object storage' thing. Isn't that just for cat pictures and memes? I'll stick with good old-fashioned FlashCache, thank you very much!
LI
Lisha
1 year ago
I agree, let's stick with what works for us.
AN
Angelo
1 year ago
FlashCache is reliable and proven. No need to complicate things with object storage.
EM
Emelda
1 year ago
I prefer FlashCache too. Object storage seems unnecessary for our needs.
KI
Kimberely
1 year ago
D) FlashCache
JU
Justa
1 year ago
C) NetApp HCI
CA
Carissa
1 year ago
B) Flash Pool
LA
Laquita
1 year ago
A) FabricPool
CA
Carman
1 year ago
FabricPool is the obvious choice here. It's designed to automatically tier data between the high-performance flash tier and the low-cost object storage tier. Easy peasy!
CU
Curtis
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, FabricPool makes it easy to tier data between flash and object storage.
DY
Dyan
1 year ago
User 1: FabricPool is definitely the way to go for that.
EM
Emilio
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) NetApp HCI could also be a potential option for this task.
FR
Freeman
2 years ago
I agree with Buddy, FabricPool is the right choice for using object storage as a cloud-based capacity tier.
BU
Buddy
2 years ago
I think the answer is A) FabricPool because it allows you to tier data to object storage.