Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

NetApp Exam NS0-194 Topic 3 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-194 exam
Question #: 73
Topic #: 3
[All NS0-194 Questions]

Your Windows clients were able to access your CIFS SVM yesterday. Today they are no longer able to access the CIFS SVM on your NetApp cluster. Your IT security team just pushed out a new group policy to enhance security.

In this scenario, which statement is true?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Domitila at Aug 22, 2024, 08:13 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-194 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Jules
10 months ago
I bet the IT team is kicking themselves right now. They probably forgot to update the CIFS SVM's domain settings when they pushed out that new policy. Classic IT blunder!
upvoted 0 times
Elden
9 months ago
Definitely a classic IT blunder. It happens to the best of us!
upvoted 0 times
...
Pok
9 months ago
Yeah, it sounds like they overlooked that detail. Hopefully they can quickly fix the domain settings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephane
10 months ago
D) Your CIFS SVM is configured for the wrong domain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renay
10 months ago
B) Your CIFS SVM is configured to use SMBv1 and SMBv2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isidra
10 months ago
A) Your CIFS SVM is not using DNS.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Katina
10 months ago
This one's a head-scratcher. Wait, is that a cricket I hear in the background? Someone needs to clean up the exam room, this place is a mess!
upvoted 0 times
...
Aja
10 months ago
Option B seems a bit too obvious. My money's on D - those pesky domain settings can really mess things up when you least expect it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meaghan
11 months ago
Definitely not C, NFS doesn't have anything to do with CIFS. I'd say it's either B or D, but I'm leaning more towards D.
upvoted 0 times
Shelton
10 months ago
Agreed, D seems like the most likely option in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicia
10 months ago
Yeah, that makes sense. It's probably D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
10 months ago
I think it's D, the CIFS SVM might be configured for the wrong domain.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Delpha
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm guessing it's option D. That new security policy must have changed the CIFS SVM's domain configuration somehow.
upvoted 0 times
Paola
9 months ago
Good idea, let's investigate further to see if that's the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
9 months ago
Maybe we should check the domain settings on the CIFS SVM to confirm.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rana
10 months ago
Yeah, the domain configuration could have been affected by the new security policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noe
10 months ago
I think you're right, option D seems like the most likely reason.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Annamae
11 months ago
I think the answer is D) Your CIFS SVM is configured for the wrong domain, as that could also cause access issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lakeesha
11 months ago
But wouldn't a new group policy affecting security make option A more likely?
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B) Your CIFS SVM is configured to use SMBv1 and SMBv2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lakeesha
11 months ago
I think the answer is A) Your CIFS SVM is not using DNS.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel